Variability in background risk and distribution of various risk factors for hearing loss may explain some of the diversity in excess risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This paper examines the impact of various risk factors on excess risk estimates of NIHL using data from the 1968–1972 NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS). Previous analyses of a subset of these data focused on 1172 highly “screened” workers. In the current analysis, an additional 894 white males (609 noise-exposed and 285 controls), who were excluded for various reasons (i.e., nonoccupational noise exposure, otologic or medical conditions affecting hearing, prior occupational noise exposure) have been added to assess excess risk of noise-induced material impairment in an unscreened population. Data are analyzed by age, duration of exposure, and sound level (8-h TWA) for four different definitions of noise-induced hearing impairment, defined as the binaural pure-tone average (PTA) hearing threshold level greater than 25 dB for the following frequencies: (a) 1–4 kHz (b) 1–3 kHz (c) 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz and (d) 3, 4, and 6 kHz Results indicate that populations with higher background risks of hearing loss may show lower excess risks attributable to noise relative to highly screened populations. Estimates of lifetime excess risk of hearing impairment were found to be significantly different between screened and unscreened population for noise levels greater than 90 dBA. Predicted age-related risk of material hearing impairment in the ONHS unscreened population was similar to that predicted from Annex B and C of ANSI S3.44 for ages less than 60 years. Results underscore the importance of understanding differential risk patterns for hearing loss and the use of appropriate reference (control) populations when evaluating risk of noise-induced hearing impairment among contemporary industrial populations.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2003
January 28 2003
Evaluation of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among unscreened male industrial workers
Mary M. Prince;
Mary M. Prince
Industrywide Studies Branch, Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies,
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephen J. Gilbert;
Stephen J. Gilbert
Risk Evaluation Branch, Education and Information Division,
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
Search for other works by this author on:
Randall J. Smith;
Randall J. Smith
Risk Evaluation Branch, Education and Information Division,
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
Search for other works by this author on:
Leslie T. Stayner
Leslie T. Stayner
Risk Evaluation Branch, Education and Information Division,
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 871–880 (2003)
Article history
Received:
April 04 2001
Accepted:
November 08 2002
Citation
Mary M. Prince, Stephen J. Gilbert, Randall J. Smith, Leslie T. Stayner; Evaluation of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among unscreened male industrial workers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 February 2003; 113 (2): 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1536635
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: Implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss
J Acoust Soc Am (July 2002)
Comparisons between the median hearing threshold levels for an unscreened black nonindustrial noise exposed population (NINEP) and several presbycusis data bases
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Effects of nosocusis, and industrial and gun noise on hearing of U.S. adults
J Acoust Soc Am (December 1991)
Hearing thresholds for “otologically normal” adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2011–12 and 2015–16
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2023)
Derivation of distributions of noise‐induced hearing levels
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)