Underwater sounds are very important in social communication of harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus) because they are the main means of long- and short-distance communication. Individual harp seals must try to avoid being masked and emit only those calls that will benefit them. Underwater vocalizations of harp seals were recorded during the breeding season. The physical characteristics associated with antimasking attributes of 16 call types were examined. Rising frequency or increasing amplitude within calls were not common. Most of the calls ended abruptly (range 145–966 dB/s), but call onset was more gradual. At high calling rates (95.1–135 calls/min) there were significantly more calls overlapping temporally than at medium (75.1–95 calls/min) or low (35–75 calls/min) calling rates, but even at the highest calling rates, 79.1% of the calls were not overlapped. When 2, 3, or 4 calls overlapped, there were significantly fewer frequency separations of less than 1/3 octave than would be expected by chance. This is important because sounds that are separated by less than 1/3 octave likely mask each other. When 2–4 calls are occurring simultaneously, only 4.5% to 14.2% are masked by virtue of being within 1/3 octave from their nearest neighbor. None of the overlappping calls was of the same type. This suggests that the seals are actively listening to each other’s calls and are not randomly using the different call types. Harp seals use frequency and temporal separation in conjunction with a wide vocal repertoire to avoid masking each other.

1.
Aubin
,
T.
, and
Jouventin
,
P.
(
2002
). “
How to vocally identify kin in a crowd: The penguin model
,”
Adv. Study Behav.
31
,
243
277
.
2.
Bradbury, J. W., and Vehrencamp, S. L. (1998). Principles of Animal Communication (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA).
3.
Brenowitz
,
E. A.
(
1986
). “
Environmental influences on acoustic and electric animal communication
,”
Brain Behav. Evol.
28
,
32
42
.
4.
Burns, J. J. (1981). “Bearded seals,” in Handbook of Marine Mammals, edited by S. H. Ridgway and R. J. Harrison (Academic, New York), Vol. 2, pp. 145–170.
5.
Chu
,
K. C.
(
1988
). “
Dive times and ventilation patterns of singing humpback whales (Megaptera novaengliae)
,”
Can. J. Zool.
66
,
1322
1327
.
6.
Cleator
,
H.
,
Stirling
,
J. I.
, and
Smith
,
T. G.
(
1989
). “
Underwater vocalizations of the bearded seal (Erignathus barbatus)
,”
Can. J. Zool.
67
,
1900
1910
.
7.
Dooling, R. J. (1982). “Auditory perception in birds,” in Acoustic Communication in Birds, edited by D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Academic, New York), pp. 95–130.
8.
Ficken
,
R. W.
,
Ficken
,
M. S.
, and
Hailman
,
J. P.
(
1974
). “
Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds
,”
Science
183
,
762
763
.
9.
Galluchon, S. (1997). “Proportion of masking in underwater vocalizations of the Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii),” B.Sc. Honours thesis, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
10.
Gourevitch, G. (1987). “Directional hearing in terrestrial mammals,” in Comparative Studies of Hearing in Vertebrates, edited by A. N. Popper and R. R. Fay (Springer, New York), pp. 357–373.
11.
Grafe
,
T. U.
(
1996
). “
The function of call alternation in the African reed frog (Hyperolius marmoratus): Precise call timing prevents auditory masking
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
38
,
149
158
.
12.
Greenfield
,
M. D.
(
1994
). “
Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of signal interactions
,”
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
25
,
97
126
.
13.
Klump, G. M. (1996). “Communication in the noisy world,” in Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, edited by D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Cornell University Press, Ithaca), pp. 321–338.
14.
Le Boeuf, B. J. (1991). “Pinniped mating systems on land, ice and in the water: Emphasis on the Phocidae,” in The Behaviour of Pinnipeds, edited by D. Renouf (Chapman and Hall, London), pp. 45–65.
15.
McElligott
,
A. G.
, and
Hayden
,
T. J.
(
1999
). “
Context-related vocalization rates of fallow bucks, Dama dama
,”
Anim. Behav.
58
,
1095
1104
.
16.
Mercado
,
E.
, and
Frazer
,
L. N.
(
1999
). “
Environmental constraints on sound transmission by humpback whales
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
3004
3016
.
17.
Merdsoy
,
B. R.
,
Curtsinger
,
W. R.
, and
Renouf
,
D.
(
1978
). “
Preliminary underwater observations of the breeding behavior of the harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus)
,”
J. Mammal.
59
,
181
185
.
18.
Møhl
,
B.
,
Terhune
,
J. M.
, and
Ronald
,
K.
(
1975
). “
Underwater calls of the harp seal, Pagophilus groenlandicus
,”
Rapp. P.-V. Reun.-Cons. Int. Explor. Mer
169
,
533
543
.
19.
Richardson, W. J. (1995). “Marine mammal hearing,” in Marine Mammals and Noise, edited by W. J. Richardson, C. R. Greene, C. I. Malme, and D. H. Thomson (Academic, San Diego), pp. 205–240.
20.
Richardson, W. J., and Malme, C. I. (1995). “Zones of noise influence,” in Marine Mammals and Noise, edited by W. J. Richardson, C. R. Greene, C. I. Malme, and D. H. Thomson (Academic, San Diego), pp. 325–386.
21.
Serrano
,
A.
(
2001
). “
New underwater and aerial vocalizations of captive harp seals.
Can. J. Zool.
79
,
75
81
.
22.
Serrano
,
A.
, and
Terhune
,
J. M.
(
2001
). “
Within-call repetition may be an antimasking strategy in underwater calls of harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus)
,”
Can. J. Zool.
79
,
1410
1413
.
23.
Serrano
,
A.
, and
Terhune
,
J. M.
(
2002
). “
Stability of the underwater vocal repertoire of harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus)
,”
Aquat. Mamm.
28
,
93
101
.
24.
Sergeant
,
D. E.
(
1991
). “
Harp seals, man and ice
,”
Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
114
,
1
153
.
25.
Smith, W. J. (1977). The Behaviour of Communication (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
26.
Terhune
,
J. M.
(
1974
). “
Directional hearing of a harbor seal in air and water
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
56
,
1862
1865
.
27.
Terhune
,
J. M.
(
1994
). “
Geographical variation of harp seal underwater vocalizations
,”
Can. J. Zool.
72
,
892
897
.
28.
Terhune
,
J. M.
(
1999
). “
Pitch separation as a possible jamming-avoidance mechanism in underwater calls of bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus)
,”
Can. J. Zool.
77
,
1025
1034
.
29.
Terhune
,
J. M.
,
Grandmaitre
,
N. C.
,
Burton
,
H. R.
, and
Green
,
K.
(
1994
). “
Weddell seals lengthen many underwater calls in response to conspecific vocalizations
,”
Bioacoustics
5
,
223
226
.
30.
Terhune
,
J. M.
, and
Ronald
,
K.
(
1986
). “
Distant and near-range functions of harp seal underwater calls
,”
Can. J. Zool.
64
,
1065
1070
.
31.
Thomas
,
J. A.
, and
Kuechle
,
V. B.
(
1982
). “
Quantitative analysis of Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddelli) underwater vocalizations at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
,
1730
1738
.
32.
Turnbull
,
S. D.
, and
Terhune
,
J. M.
(
1993
). “
Repetition enhances hearing detection thresholds in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina)
,”
Can. J. Zool.
71
,
926
932
.
33.
Vaughan, T. A. (1986). Mammalogy, 3rd ed. (Saunders College Publishing, New York).
34.
Watkins
,
W. A.
, and
Schevill
,
W. E.
(
1979
). “
Distinctive characteristics of underwater calls of the harp seal, Phoca groenlandica, during the breeding season.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
66
,
983
988
.
35.
Wiley, R. H., and Richards, D. G. (1982). “Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: Sound transmission and signal detection,” in Acoustic Communication in Birds, edited by D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Academic, New York), pp. 131–181.
36.
Zar, J. H. (1996). Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.