When binaural sound signals are presented with loudspeakers, the system inversion involved gives rise to a number of problems such as a loss of dynamic range and a lack of robustness to small errors and room reflections. The amplification required by the system inversion results in loss of dynamic range. The control performance of such a system deteriorates severely due to small errors resulting from, e.g., misalignment of the system and individual differences in the head related transfer functions at certain frequencies. The required large sound radiation results in severe reflection which also reduces the control performance. A method of overcoming these fundamental problems is proposed in this paper. A conceptual monopole transducer is introduced whose position varies continuously as frequency varies. This gives a minimum processing requirement of the binaural signals for the control to be achieved and all the above problems either disappear or are minimized. The inverse filters have flat amplitude response and the reproduced sound is not colored even outside the relatively large “sweet area.” A number of practical solutions are suggested for the realization of such optimally distributed transducers. One of them is a discretization that enables the use of conventional transducer units.

1.
J. Blauert, Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997), Chap. 2, pp. 50–136.
2.
H.
Møller
, “
Fundamentals of Binaural Technology
,”
Appl. Acoust.
36
,
171
218
(
1992
).
3.
D. R. Begault, 3-D Sound for Virtual Reality and Multimedia (AP Professional, Cambridge, MA, 1994).
4.
M. R. Schroeder and B. S. Atal, “Computer simulation of sound transmission in rooms,” IEEE Intercon. Rec. Pt7, 150–155, 1963.
5.
P.
Damaske
, “
Head-related two-channel stereophony with reproduction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
50
,
1109
1115
(
1971
).
6.
J. L.
Bauck
and
D. H.
Cooper
, “
Generalized transaural stereo and applications
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
,
44
,
683
705
(
1996
).
7.
P. A.
Nelson
,
O.
Kirkeby
,
T.
Takeuchi
, and
H.
Hamada
, “
Sound fields for the production of virtual acoustic images
,”
J. Sound Vib.
204
,
386
396
(
1997
).
8.
P. A.
Nelson
,
F.
Orduna-Bustamante
, and
H.
Hamada
, “
Inverse filter design and equalisation zones in multi-channel sound reproduction
,”
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.
3
,
185
192
(
1995
).
9.
O.
Kirkeby
,
P. A.
Nelson
,
F.
Orduna-Bustamante
, and
H.
Hamada
, “
Local sound field reproduction using digital signal processing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
1584
1593
(
1996
).
10.
S. Barnett, Matrices—Methods and Applications (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990), Chap. 8, pp. 218–225, 396–401.
11.
E. M.
Wenzel
,
M.
Arruda
,
D. J.
Kistler
, and
F. L.
Wightman
, “
Localisation using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
,
111
123
(
1993
).
12.
H.
Møller
,
M. F.
Sørensen
,
D.
Hammershøi
, and
C. B.
Jensen
, “
Head-related transfer functions on human subjects
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
,
43
,
300
321
(
1995
).
13.
T. Takeuchi, P. A. Nelson, O. Kirkeby, and H. Hamada, “Influence of individual head related transfer function on the performance of virtual acoustic imaging systems,” 104th AES Convention Preprint 4700 (P4-3), 1998.
14.
T.
Takeuchi
,
P. A.
Nelson
, and
H.
Hamada
, “
Robustness to Head Misalignment of Virtual Sound Imaging Systems
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
958
971
(
2001
).
15.
D. B.
Ward
and
G. W.
Elko
, “
Effect of loudspeaker position on the robustness of acoustic crosstalk cancellation
,”
IEEE Signal Process. Lett.
6
,
106
108
(
1999
).
16.
W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
17.
T. Takeuchi, P. A. Nelson, O. Kirkeby, and H. Hamada, “The effects of reflections on the performance of virtual acoustic imaging systems” in Proceedings of the Active 97, The International Symposium on Active Control of Sound and Vibration, Budapest, Hungary, 1997, pp. 955–966.
18.
B.
Rakerd
, and
W. M.
Hartmann
, “
Localization of sound in rooms. II. The effects of a single reflecting surface
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
78
,
524
533
(
1985
).
19.
U. Burandt, C. Poesselt, S. Ambrozus, M. Hosenfeld, and V. Knauff, “Anthropometric contribution to standardising manikins for artificial head microphones and to measuring headphones and ear protectors,” Appl. Ergonomics 22, 373–378 (1991).
20.
B. Gardner and K. Martin, “HRTF Measurements of a KEMAR Dummy-Head Microphone,” MIT Media Lab Perceptual Computing—Technical Report No. 280, 1994.
21.
T. Takeuchi and P. A. Nelson, “Optimal source distribution for virtual acoustic imaging,” ISVR Technical Report No. 288, University of Southampton, 2000.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.