The middle latency response (MLR) may be used as an indicator of anesthetic depth but has been criticized due to its long acquisition time. This study explores methods for optimizing recording of the MLR to maximize signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and hence reduce acquisition time. The first experiment investigates the effects of increasing stimulation rate beyond conventional values and also using higher rates by means of maximum length sequences (MLS). The second experiment compares the use of click and chirp stimuli to elicit the MLR, both at conventional and MLS stimulation rates. For all conditions total recording duration is fixed at 185 s and stimulation level is fixed at 60 dB SL. It was found that SNR increases progressively with rate using conventional click stimulation until the theoretical rate limit is reached at the reciprocal of the response duration. The SNR improvement is equivalent to increasing test speed by a factor of 3. Using MLS stimulation, the SNR increases further until a maximum is reached at a rate of 167 clicks/s, equivalent to a fivefold test speed improvement relative to a conventional recording at 5 clicks/s. The use of chirp stimuli designed to compensate for the frequency dependent cochlear traveling wave delay produces an increase in wave V–Na amplitude at all recording rates. For the later latency waves of the response an increase in amplitude is seen for MLS, but not for conventional chirp trains. The optimum SNR was obtained using chirp stimuli at a MLS rate of 167 opportunities/s. It is concluded that the combination of chirps and MLS can reduce acquisition time to less than one-tenth of that required for conventional stimulation at 5 clicks/s for the same SNR. This would confer material benefits for estimating anesthetic depth using MLR.

1.
Allen
,
R.
, and
Smith
,
D.
(
2001
). “
Neuro-fuzzy closed-loop control of depth of anasthesia
,”
Artif. Intell. Med.
21
,
185
91
.
2.
Beer
,
N. A. M.
,
Van Hooff
,
J. V.
,
Brunia
,
C. H. M.
,
Cluitmans
,
P. J. M.
,
Korsten
,
H. H. M.
, and
Beneken
,
J. E. W.
(
1996
). “
Midlatency auditory evoked potentials as indicators of perceptual processing during general anasthesia
,”
Br. J. Anaesth.
77
,
617
624
.
3.
Bell
,
S. L.
,
Allen
,
R.
, and
Lutman
,
M. E.
(
2001
). “
The feasibility of maximum length sequences to reduce acquisition time of the middle latency response
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
1073
1081
.
4.
Burkard
,
R.
(
1991
). “
Human brain-stem auditory evoked responses obtained by cross correlation to trains of clicks, noise bursts, and tone bursts
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
1398
404
.
5.
Burkard
,
R.
,
Shi
,
Y.
, and
Hecox
,
K. E.
(
1990
). “
Brain-stem auditory-evoked responses elicited by maximum length sequences: Effects of simultaneous masking noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
1665
1672
.
6.
Dau
,
T.
,
Wegner
,
O.
,
Mellert
,
V.
, and
Kollmeier
,
B.
(
2000
). “
Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
1530
1540
.
7.
Elberling
,
C.
, and
Don
,
M.
(
1984
). “
Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses
,”
Scand. Audiol.
13
,
187
197
.
8.
Elkfafi
,
M.
,
Shieh
,
J. S.
,
Linkens
,
D. A.
, and
Peacock
,
J. E.
(
1997
). “
Intelligent signal processing of evoked potentials for anasthesia monitoring and control
,”
IEE Proc.: Control Theory Appl.
144
,
354
360
.
9.
Eysholdt
,
U.
, and
Schreiner
,
C.
(
1982
). “
Maximum length sequences—A fast method for measuring brainstem evoked responses
,”
Audiology
21
,
242
250
.
10.
Hall, J. W. (1992). Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses (Allyn and Bacon, Boston).
11.
Heier
,
T.
, and
Steen
,
P. A.
(
1996
). “
Assessment of anesthesia depth
,”
Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.
40
,
1087
1100
.
12.
Jessop
,
J.
, and
Jones
,
J. G.
(
1992
). “
Evaluation of the actions of general anasthetics in the human brain
,”
Gen. Pharmacol.
23
,
927
35
.
13.
Jiang
,
Z. D.
,
Brosi
,
D. M.
, and
Wilkinson
,
A. R.
(
1999
). “
Brainstem auditory evoked response recording using maximum length sequences in term neonates
,”
Biol. Neonate
76
,
193
199
.
14.
Kadobayashi
,
I.
,
Kira
,
Y.
,
Toyoshima
,
A.
, and
Nishijima
,
H. A.
(
1984
). “
A study of auditory middle latency responses in relation to electrode combinations and stimulus conditions
,”
Audiology
23
,
509
519
.
15.
Kenny
,
G. N.
, and
Mantzaridis
,
H.
(
1999
). “
Closed-loop control of propofol anasthesia
,”
Br. J. Anaesth.
8
,
223
228
.
16.
Leung
,
S.
,
Slaven
,
A.
,
Thornton
,
A. R. D.
, and
Brickley
,
G. J.
(
1998
). “
The use of high stimulus rate auditory brainstem responses in the estimation of hearing threshold
,”
Hear. Res.
123
,
201
205
.
17.
Lina-Granada
,
G.
,
Collet
,
L.
, and
Morgon
,
A.
(
1994
). “
Auditory-evoked brainstem responses elicited by maximum-length sequences in normal and sensorineural ears
,”
Audiology
33
,
218
236
.
18.
Musiek
,
F. E.
, and
Lee
,
W. W.
(
1997
). “
Conventional and maximum length sequences middle latency response in patients with central nervous system lesions
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
8
,
173
180
.
19.
O’Neill
,
G.
(
1985
). “
Prediction of post-operative middle ear pressure changes after general anesthesia with nitrous oxide
,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol.
100
,
51
57
.
20.
Picton
,
T. W.
,
Champagne
,
S. C.
, and
Kellett
,
A. J. C.
(
1992
). “
Human auditory potentials recorded using maximum length sequences
,”
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
84
,
90
100
.
21.
Rupp, A., Uppenkamp, S., Gutschalk, A., Dau, T., Patterson, R., and Scherg, M. (2001). “On the representation of peripheral neural activity patterns in primary auditory cortex,” Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Midwinter meeting.
22.
Sininger
,
Y. S.
(
1993
). “
Auditory brain stem response for objective measures of hearing
,”
Ear Hear.
14
,
23
30
.
23.
Thornton
,
A. R. D.
(
1993
). “
High rate otoacoustic emissions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
,
132
136
.
24.
Thornton, C., and Newton, D. E. F. (1989). “The auditory evoked response: A measure of depth of anasthesia,” in Balliere’s Clinical Anasthesiology: Depth of Anasthesia, edited by J. G. Jones (Balliere-Tindall, London, 1989), pp. 559–585.
25.
Thornton
,
C.
,
Barrowcliffe
,
M. P.
,
Konieczko
,
K. M.
,
Ventham
,
P.
,
Doro
,
C. J.
,
Newton
,
D. E. F.
, and
Jones
,
J. G.
(
1989
). “
The auditory evoked response as an indicator of awareness
,”
Br. J. Anaesth.
63
,
113
115
.
26.
Tunstall
,
M. E.
(
1977
). “
Detecting wakefulness during general anasthesia for Caesarean section
,”
Br. Med. J.
21
,
1321
.
27.
Van Veen
,
B. D.
, and
Lasky
,
R. E.
(
1994
). “
A framework for assessing the relative efficiency of stimulus sequences in evoked response measurements
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
2235
2243
.
28.
Wong
,
P. K. H.
, and
Bickford
,
R. G.
(
1980
). “
Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: The use of noise estimate
,”
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
50
,
25
34
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.