People with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss differ in the benefit they gain from amplification of high frequencies when listening to speech. Using vowel–consonant–vowel (VCV) stimuli in quiet that were amplified and then low pass filtered with various cutoff frequencies, Vickers et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1164–1175 (2001)] found that the benefit from amplification of high-frequency components was related to the presence or absence of a cochlear dead region at high frequencies. For hearing-impaired subjects without dead regions, performance improved with increasing cutoff frequency up to 7.5 kHz (the highest value tested). Subjects with high-frequency dead regions showed no improvement when the cutoff frequency was increased above about 1.7 times the edge frequency of the dead region. The present study was similar to that of Vickers et al. but used VCV stimuli presented in background noise. Ten subjects with high-frequency hearing loss, including eight from the study of Vickers et al., were tested. Five had dead regions starting below 2 kHz, and five had no dead regions. Speech stimuli at a nominal level of 65 dB were mixed with spectrally matched noise, amplified according to the “Cambridge” prescriptive formula for each subject and then low pass filtered. The noise level was chosen separately for each subject to give a moderate reduction in intelligibility relative to listening in quiet. For subjects without dead regions, performance generally improved with increasing cutoff frequency up to 7.5 kHz, on average more so in noise than in quiet. For most subjects with dead regions, performance improved with cutoff frequency up to 1.5–2 times the edge frequency of the dead region, but hardly changed with further increases. Calculations of speech audibility using a modified version of the articulation index showed that application of the Cambridge formula was at least partially successful in making high-frequency components of the speech audible for subjects with dead regions, and that such subjects often failed to benefit from increased audibility of the speech at high frequencies.

1.
Amos, N. E., and Humes, L. E. (2001). “The contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in sensorineural hearing loss,” in Physiological and Psychophysical Bases of Auditory Function, edited by D. J. Breebaart, A. J. M. Houtsma, A. Kohlrausch, V. F. Prijs, and R. Schoonhoven (Shaker, Maastricht).
2.
ANSI (1997). ANSI S3.5-1997, “Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
3.
Baer, T., Moore, B. C. J., and Kluk, K. (2002). “Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for listeners with and without dead regions at high frequencies,” Int. J. Audiol. (in press).
4.
Burkhard
,
M. D.
, and
Sachs
,
R. M.
(
1975
). “
Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
58
,
214
222
.
5.
Ching
,
T.
,
Dillon
,
H.
, and
Byrne
,
D.
(
1998
). “
Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
1128
1140
.
6.
Gatehouse
,
S.
(
1992
). “
The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: Evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
1258
1268
.
7.
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1990
). “
Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data
,”
Hear. Res.
47
,
103
138
.
8.
Hogan
,
C. A.
, and
Turner
,
C. W.
(
1998
). “
High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
432
441
.
9.
Miller
,
G. A.
, and
Nicely
,
P. E.
(
1955
). “
An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
27
,
338
352
.
10.
Moore, B. C. J. (1998). Cochlear Hearing Loss (Whurr, London).
11.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
2001
). “
Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids
,”
Trends Amplif.
5
,
1
34
.
12.
Moore, B. C. J. (2002). “Response to ‘Articulation index predictions for hearing-impaired listeners with and without cochlear dead regions,’ ” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (in press).
13.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Alcántara
,
J. I.
(
2001
). “
The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea
,”
Ear Hear.
22
,
268
278
.
14.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1997
). “
A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss
,”
Aud. Neurosci.
3
,
289
311
.
15.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1998
). “
Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
32
,
317
335
.
16.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Baer
,
T.
(
1997
). “
A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness and partial loudness
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
45
,
224
240
.
17.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Huss
,
M.
,
Vickers
,
D. A.
,
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Alcántara
,
J. I.
(
2000
). “
A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
34
,
205
224
.
18.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Laurence
,
R. F.
, and
Wright
,
D.
(
1985
). “
Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
19
,
175
187
.
19.
Murray
,
N.
, and
Byrne
,
D.
(
1986
). “
Performance of hearing-impaired and normal hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids
,”
Aust. J. Audiol.
8
,
21
28
.
20.
Patterson, R. D., and Moore, B. C. J. (1986). “Auditory filters and excitation patterns as representations of frequency resolution,” in Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, edited by B. C. J. Moore (Academic, London).
21.
Rankovic, C. M. (2002). “Articulation index predictions for hearing-impaired listeners with and without cochlear dead regions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (in press).
22.
Skinner
,
M. W.
, and
Miller
,
J. D.
(
1983
). “
Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss
,”
Audiology
22
,
253
279
.
23.
Turner
,
C. W.
, and
Cummings
,
K. J.
(
1999
). “
Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss
,”
Am J. Audiol.
8
,
47
56
.
24.
Vickers
,
D. A.
,
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Baer
,
T.
(
2001
). “
Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
1164
1175
.
25.
Villchur
,
E.
(
1973
). “
Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
53
,
1646
1657
.
26.
Zwicker
,
E.
, and
Terhardt
,
E.
(
1980
). “
Analytical expressions for critical band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
68
,
1523
1525
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.