A part of becoming a mature perceiver involves learning what signal properties provide relevant information about objects and events in the environment. Regarding speech perception, evidence supports the position that allocation of attention to various signal properties changes as children gain experience with their native language, and so learn what information is relevant to recognizing phonetic structure in that language. However, one weakness in that work has been that data have largely come from experiments that all use similarly designed stimuli and show similar age-related differences in labeling. In this study, two perception experiments were conducted that used stimuli designed differently from past experiments, with different predictions. In experiment 1, adults and children (4, 6, and 8 years of age) labeled stimuli with natural /f/ and /θ/ noises and synthetic vocalic portions that had initial formant transitions varying in appropriateness for /f/ or /θ/. The prediction was that similar labeling patterns would be found for all listeners. In experiment 2, adults and children labeled stimuli with initial /s/-like and /∫/-like noises and synthetic vocalic portions that had initial formant transitions varying in appropriateness for /s/ or /∫/. The prediction was that, as found before, children would weight formant transitions more and fricative noises less than adults, but that this age-related difference would elicit different patterns of labeling from those found previously. Results largely matched predictions, and so further evidence was garnered for the position that children learn which properties of the speech signal provide relevant information about phonetic structure in their native language.

1.
Charles-Luce
,
J.
, and
Luce
,
P. A.
(
1990
). “
Similarity neighbourhoods of words in young children’s lexicons
,”
J. Child Lang.
17
,
205
215
.
2.
Charles-Luce
,
J.
, and
Luce
,
P. A.
(
1995
). “
An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children’s receptive vocabularies
,”
J. Child Lang.
22
,
727
735
.
3.
deVilliers, J. G., and deVilliers, P. A. (1978). Language Acquisition (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).
4.
Gibson, E. J. (1991a). “How perception really develops: A view from outside the network,” in An Odyssey in Learning and Perception (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 411–491. [Reprinted from Basic Processes in Reading: Perception and Comprehension, edited by D. Laberge and S. J. Samuels (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977), pp. 155–173.]
5.
Gibson, E. J. (1991b). An Odyssey in Learning and Perception (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
6.
Goldman, R., and Fristoe, M. (1986). Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation (American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN).
7.
Harris
,
K. S.
(
1958
). “
Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables
,”
Lang. Speech
1
,
1
7
.
8.
Jastak, S., and Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). The Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised (Jastak Associates, Wilmington, DE).
9.
Nittrouer
,
S.
(
1992
). “
Age-related differences in perceptual effects of formant transitions within syllables and across syllable boundaries
,”
J. Phonetics
20
,
1
32
.
10.
Nittrouer
,
S.
(
1995
). “
Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: Evidence from spectral moments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
520
530
.
11.
Nittrouer
,
S.
, and
Miller
,
M. E.
(
1997a
). “
Developmental weighting shifts for noise components of fricative-vowel syllables
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
,
572
580
.
12.
Nittrouer
,
S.
, and
Miller
,
M. E.
(
1997b
). “
Predicting developmental shifts in perceptual weighting schemes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
2253
2266
.
13.
Nittrouer
,
S.
, and
Miller
,
M. E.
(
1999
). “
The development of phonemic coding strategies for serial recall
,”
Appl. Psycholing.
20
,
563
588
.
14.
Nittrouer
,
S.
, and
Studdert-Kennedy
,
M.
(
1987
). “
The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
30
,
319
329
.
15.
Nittrouer
,
S.
,
Studdert-Kennedy
,
M.
, and
Neely
,
S. T.
(
1996
). “
How children learn to organize their speech gestures: Further evidence from fricative-vowel syllables
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
39
,
379
389
.
16.
Oller, D. K. (1986). “Metaphonology and infant vocalization,” in Precursors of Early Speech, edited by B. Lindblom and R. Zettersröm (Stockton, New York), pp. 21–36.
17.
Slobin, D. I. (1973). “Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar,” in Studies of Child Language Development, edited by C. A. Ferguson and D. I. Slobin (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York), pp. 175–208.
18.
Strange, W. (editor). (1995). Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Research (York, Baltimore).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.