This paper presents an analysis of hearing threshold levels among 2066 white male workers employed in various U.S. industries studied in the 1968–72 NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS). The distribution of hearing threshold levels (HTL) is examined in relation to various risk factors (age, prior occupational noise, medical conditions) for hearing loss among a population of noise exposed and control (low noise-exposed) industrial workers. Previous analyses of a subset of these data from the ONHS focused on 1172 highly “screened” workers. An additional 894 male workers (609 noise-exposed and 285 controls), who were excluded for various reasons (i.e., nonoccupational noise exposure, otologic or medical conditions affecting hearing, prior occupational noise exposure) have been added to examine hearing loss in an unscreened population. Data are analyzed by age, duration of exposure, and sound level (8-h TWA) by individual test frequency. Results indicate that hearing threshold levels are higher among unscreened noise-exposed and control workers relative to screened workers. Analysis of risk factors such as nonoccupational noise exposure, medical conditions, and type of industry among unscreened controls indicated that these factors were not significantly associated with increased mean HTLs or risk of material impairment over and above what is expected due to age. Age-specific mean hearing threshold levels (and percentiles of the distribution) among the unscreened ONHS control population may be used as a comparison population of low-noise exposed white male industrial workers for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs for workers less than 55 years of age. To make valid inferences regarding occupational noise-induced hearing loss, it is important to use hearing data from reference (control) populations that are similar with respect to the degree of subject screening, type of work force (blue vs white collar), and the distribution of other risk factors for hearing loss.
REFERENCES
1.
ANSI (1960). ANSI S3.1-1960, “American National Standard Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
2.
ANSI (1969). ANSI S3.6-1969, “American National Standard Specification for Audiometers” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
3.
ANSI (1989). ANSI S3.6-1989, “American National Standard Specification for Audiometers” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
4.
ANSI (1996). ANSI S3.44-1996, “American National Standard Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-induced Hearing Impairment” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
5.
Berger
, E. H.
, Royster
, L. H.
, and Thomas
, W. G.
(1977
). “Hearing levels of nonindustrial noise exposed subjects.
” J. Occup. Med.
19
, 664
–670
.6.
Brant
, L. J.
, and Fozard
, J. L.
(1990
). “Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
, 813
–820
.7.
Brant
, L. J.
, Gordon-Salant
, S.
, Pearson
, J. D.
, Klein
, L. L.
, Morrell
, C. H.
, Metter
, E. J.
, and Fozard
, J. L.
(1996
). “Risk factors related to age-associated hearing loss in the speech frequencies.
” J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
7
, 152
–160
.8.
Breslow, N. E., and Day, N. E. (1980). “Classical Methods of Analysis of Grouped Data,” in Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Vol. I—The Analysis of Case-control Studies (International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France), IARC Publication No. 32, Chap. 4, pp. 140–148.
9.
Davis
, R. R.
, and Sieber
, W. K.
(1998
). “Trends in hearing protector usage in American manufacturing from 1972–1989
,” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.
59
, 715
–722
.10.
Dobie
, R. A.
(1995
). “Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss
,” Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
121
, 385
–391
.11.
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1966). Applied Regression Analysis (Wiley, New York).
12.
Driscoll
, D. P.
, and Royster
, L. H.
(1984
). “Comparisons between the median hearing threshold levels for an unscreened black nonindustrial noise exposed population (NINEP) and four presbycusis data bases.
” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.
45
, 577
–593
.13.
Gates
, G. A.
, Cobb
, J. L.
, D’Agostino
, R. B.
, and Wolf
, P. A.
(1993
). “The relation of hearing in the elderly to the presence of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors
,” Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
119
(2
), 156
–161
.14.
ISO 1999 (1990). “Acoustics—Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment,” International Organization for Standardization.
15.
Lempert, B. L., and Henderson T. L. (1973). “Occupational Noise and Hearing 1968 to 1972: A NIOSH Study,” U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Laboratories and Criteria Development, Cincinnati, OH.
16.
MathSoft (1997). S-PLUS 4 Guide to Statistics, Data Analysis Products Division, MathSoft, Seattle, WA.
17.
McBride
, D.
(1993
). “Hearing conservation in the mining industry. Evaluation of a risk factor questionnaire.
” Occup. Med.
43
, 85
–92
.18.
Morrell
, C. H.
, and Brant
, L. J.
(1991
). “Modeling hearing threshold levels in the elderly
,” Stat. Med.
10
, 1453
–1464
.19.
Morrell
, C. H.
, Gordon-Salant
, S.
, Pearson
, J. D.
, Brant
, L. J.
, and Fozard
, J. L.
(1996
). “Age- and gender-specific reference ranges for hearing level and longitudinal changes in hearing level
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
, 1949
–1967
(Part 1).20.
MSHA (1999). “Health Standards for Occupational Noise Exposure; Final Rule,” Mine Safety and Health Administration, 30 CFR Part 62, 64 Fed. Reg., 49548-49634, 49636-49637.
21.
NIOSH (1972). “NIOSH criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational exposure to noise,” Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHSS(NIOSH) Publication No. HIM 73-11001.
22.
NIOSH (1988a). National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES), Field Guidelines. Vol. I, Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 88-106.
23.
NIOSH (1988b). National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES), Analysis of Management Interview Responses. Vol. III, Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 89-103.
24.
NIOSH (1990). National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES), Sampling Methodology. Vol. II, Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 89-102.
25.
Noriyuki
, N.
, Mitsuharu
, O.
, Nakamura
, K.
, Suzaki
, K.
, and Tatar
, K.
(2000
). “Cigarette smoking and risk for hearing impairment: A longitudinal study in Japanese male office workers.
” J. Occup. Environ. Med.
42
(11
), 1045
–1049
.26.
OSHA (1983). “Occupational Noise Exposure: Hearing Conservation Amendment; Final Rule,” Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 290 CFR 1910.95; 48 Fed. Reg., 9738-9785.
27.
Passchier-Vermeer, W. (1968). “Hearing loss due to exposure to steady-state broadband noise,” Report No. 35 and Supplement to Report No. 35, Institute for Public Health Engineering, The Netherlands.
28.
Pearson
, J. D.
, Morrell
, C. H.
, Gordon-Salant
, S.
, Brant
, L. J.
, Mettor
, E. F.
, Klien
, L. L.
, and Fozard
, J. L.
(1995
). “Gender differences in a longitudinal study of age-associated hearing loss
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
, 1196
–1205
.29.
Prince
, M. M.
, Stayner
, L. T.
, Smith
, R. J.
, and Gilbert
, S. J.
(1997
). “A re-examination of risk estimates from the NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS)
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 950
–963
.30.
Reilly
, M. J.
, Rosenman
, K. D.
, and Kalinowski
, D. J.
(1998
). “Occupational noise-induced hearing loss surveillance in Michigan
,” J. Occup. Environ. Med.
40
, 667
–674
.31.
Ries
, P. W.
(1994
). “Prevalence and characteristics of persons with hearing trouble: United States 1990–1991
,” Vital Health Stat.
10
, 1
–75
.32.
Robinson, D. W. (1970). “Relations between hearing loss and noise exposure,” in Hearing and Noise in Industry, edited by W. Burns and D. W. Robinson (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London), pp. 100–151.
33.
Robinson, D. W., and Sutton, G. O. (1975). “A Comparative Analysis of Data on the Relation of Pure-tone Audiometric Thresholds to Age.” NPL Acoustics Report AC84, England, April 1978.
34.
Royster
, L. H.
, Royster
, J. D.
, and Thomas
, W. G.
(1980
). “Representative hearing levels by race and sex in North Carolina industry
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
68
, 551
–566
.35.
Royster
, L. H.
, and Thomas
, W. G.
(1979
). “Age effect hearing levels for a white nonindustrial noise exposed population (ninep) and their use in evaluating industrial hearing conservation programs
,” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.
40
, 504
–511
.36.
Royster
, L. H.
, and Royster
, J. D.
(1984
). “Hearing protection utilization: Survey results across the USA
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1
76
, S43
.37.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1989). SAS Institute, Inc., SAS/STAT® User’s Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 1, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., 1989.
38.
Simpson, M., and Bruce, R. (1981). “Noise in America: The Extent of the Noise Problem,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report No. 550/9-81-101.
39.
Tomei
, F.
, Papaleo
, B.
, Baccolo
, T. P.
, Tomao
, E.
, Alfi
, P.
, and Fantini
, S.
(1996
). “Chronic noise exposure and the cardiovascular system in aircraft pilots.
” Med. Lav
87
(5
), 394
–410
.40.
U.S. DHHS (2000) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, November.
41.
Weeks, J. L., Levy, B. S., and Wagner, G. R. (Eds.) (1991). Preventing Occupational Disease and Injury (American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 Acoustical Society of America.
2002
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.