Two experiments were conducted to investigate whether or not anchoring and selective adaptation induce basically the same psychological effects. The purpose of the first experiment is to show how an audiovisual anchor modifies the perception of consonant–vowel (CV) syllables. The anchors were two purely acoustical, two purely optical, and three audiovisual CV syllables. The results were compared with those of audiovisual speech selective-adaptation experiments conducted by Roberts and Summerfield [Percept. Psychophys. 30, 309–314 (1981)] and Saldaña and Rosenblum [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3658–3661 (1994)]. The audiovisual anchoring effects were found to be very similar to the audiovisual selective-adaptation effects, but the incompatible audiovisual anchor produced more auditory-based contrast than the purely acoustical anchor or the compatible audiovisual anchor. This difference in contrast had not been found in the previous selective-adaptation experiments. The second experiment was conducted to directly compare audiovisual anchoring and selective-adaptation effects under the same stimuli and with the same subjects. It was found that the compatible audiovisual syllable (AbVb) caused more contrast in selective adaptation than in anchoring, although the discrepant audiovisual syllable (AbVg) caused no difference between anchoring and selective adaptation. It was also found that the anchor AbVg caused more auditory-based contrast than the anchor AbVb. It is suggested that the mechanisms behind these results are different.

1.
Blumstein
,
S. E.
,
Stevens
,
K. N.
, and
Nigro
,
G. N.
(
1977
). “
Property detectors for bursts and transitions in speech perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
1301
1313
.
2.
Burnham, D. (1998). “Language specificity in the development of auditory-visual speech perception,” in Hearing by Eye II, edited by R. Campbell, B. Dodd, and D. Burnham (Psychology, Hove, UK), pp. 27–60.
3.
Cole
,
R. A.
,
Cooper
,
W. E.
,
Singer
,
J.
, and
Allard
,
F.
(
1975
). “
Selective adaptation of English consonants using real speech
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
18
,
227
244
.
4.
Diehl
,
R. L.
,
Lang
,
M.
, and
Parker
,
E. M.
(
1980
). “
A further parallel between selective adaptation and contrast
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
6
,
24
44
.
5.
Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior (Harper, New York).
6.
Helson, H. (1971). “Adaptation-level theory: 1970 and after,” in Adaptation Level Theory, edited by M. H. Appley (Academic, New York), pp. 5–17.
7.
McGrath
,
M.
, and
Summerfield
,
Q.
(
1985
). “
Intermodal timing relations and audio-visual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
,
678
685
.
8.
McGurk
,
H.
, and
MacDonald
,
J.
(
1976
). “
Hearing lips and seeing voices
,”
Nature (London)
264
,
746
748
.
9.
Parducci
,
A.
(
1965
). “
Category judgment: A range-frequency model
,”
Psychol. Rev.
72
,
407
418
.
10.
Parducci, A. (1974). “Contextual effects: A range-frequency analysis,” in Handbook of Perception 2, edited by E. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman (Academic, New York), pp. 127–141.
11.
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1975
). “
Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception
,”
Memory Cogn.
3
,
7
18
.
12.
Repp
,
B. H.
(
1982
). “
Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception
,”
Psychol. Bull.
92
,
81
110
.
13.
Roberts
,
M.
, and
Summerfield
,
Q.
(
1981
). “
Audiovisual presentation demonstrates that selective adaptation in speech perception is purely auditory
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
30
,
309
314
.
14.
Saldaña
,
H. M.
, and
Rosenblum
,
L. D.
(
1994
). “
Selective adaptation in speech perception using a compelling audiovisual adaptor
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
3658
3661
.
15.
Sawusch
,
J. R.
, and
Jusczyk
,
P.
(
1981
). “
Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
7
,
408
421
.
16.
Sawusch
,
J. R.
, and
Nusbaum
,
H. C.
(
1979
). “
Contextual effects in vowel perception I: Anchor-induced contrast effects
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
25
,
292
302
.
17.
Sekiyama
,
K.
, and
Tohkura
,
Y.
(
1991
). “
McGurk effect in non-English listeners: Few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
1797
1805
.
18.
Shigeno
,
S.
(
1999
). “
The use of short-term memory in the discrimination of visually-influenced CV-syllables
,”
Jpn. J. Psychonom. Sci.
18
,
62
72
.
19.
Shigeno
,
S.
(
2000
). “
Influence of vowel context on the audio-visual speech perception of voiced stop consonants
,”
Jpn. Psychol. Res.
42
,
155
167
.
20.
Shigeno
,
S.
, and
Fujisaki
,
H.
(
1979
). “
Effect of a preceding anchor upon the categorical judgment of speech and nonspeech stimuli
,”
Jpn. Psychol. Res.
21
,
165
173
.
21.
Simon
,
H.
, and
Studdert-Kennedy
,
M.
(
1978
). “
Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
,
1338
1357
.
22.
Smeele, P. M. T., Sittig, A. C., and van Heuven, V. J. (1992). “Intelligibility of audio-visually desynchronized speech: Asymmetrical effect of phoneme position,” Proc. ICSLP, pp. 65–68.
23.
Studdert-Kennedy
,
M.
(
1976
). “
Stimulus range as a determinant of phoneme boundaries along synthetic continua
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Suppl. 1
60
,
S92
.
24.
Thompson
,
C. L.
, and
Hollien
,
H.
(
1970
). “
Some contextual effects on the perception of synthetic vowels
,”
Lang Speech
13
,
1
13
.
25.
Warren
,
R. M.
, and
Gregory
,
R. L.
(
1958
). “
An auditory analogue of the visual reversible figure
,”
Am. J. Psychol.
71
,
612
613
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.