Sounds with frequencies >15 kHz elicit an acoustic startle response (ASR) in flying crickets (Eunemobius carolinus). Although frequencies <15 kHz do not elicit the ASR when presented alone, when presented with ultrasound (40 kHz), low-frequency stimuli suppress the ultrasound-induced startle. Thus, using methods similar to those in masking experiments, we used two-tone suppression to assay sensitivity to frequencies in the audio band. Startle suppression was tuned to frequencies near 5 kHz, the frequency range of male calling songs. Similar to equal loudness contours measured in humans, however, equal suppression contours were not parallel, as the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of suppression tuning changed with increases in ultrasound intensity. Temporal integration of suppressor stimuli was measured using nonsimultaneous presentations of 5-ms pulses of 6 and 40 kHz. We found that no suppression occurs when the suppressing tone is >2 ms after and >5 ms before the ultrasound stimulus, suggesting that stimulus overlap is a requirement for suppression. When considered together with our finding that the intensity of low-frequency stimuli required for suppression is greater than that produced by singing males, the overlap requirement suggests that two-tone suppression functions to limit the ASR to sounds containing only ultrasound and not to broadband sounds that span the audio and ultrasound range.
REFERENCES
1.
Alexander
, R. D.
(1957
). “The song relationships of four species of ground crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Nemobius)
,” Ohio J. Sci.
57
, 153
–163
.2.
Arthur
, R. M.
, Pfeiffer
, R. R.
, and Suga
, N.
(1971
). “Properties of ‘two-tone inhibition’ in primary auditory neurones
,” J. Physiol. London
212
, 593
–609
.3.
Boyan
, G.
(1981
). “Two-tone suppression of an identified auditory neurone in the brain of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer)
,” J. Comp. Physiol.
144
, 117
–125
.4.
Boyan
, G.
(1986
). “Modulation of auditory responsiveness in the locust Locusta Migratoria
,” J. Comp. Physiol.
158
, 813
–826
.5.
Capranica, R. R. (1965). “The evoked vocal responses of the bullfrog: a study of communication by sound,” Research Monograph 33 (MIT, Cambridge, MA).
6.
Capranica
, R. R.
(1992
). “The untuning of the tuning curve: is it time?
,” Semin. Neurosci.
4
, 401
–408
.7.
Delgutte, B. (1996). “Physiological models for basic auditory percepts,” in Auditory Computation, edited by H. L. Hawkins, T. A. McMullen, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay (Springer-Verlag, New York).
8.
Ehret
, G.
, Moffat
, A. J. M.
, and Tautz
, J.
(1982
). “Behavioral determination of frequency resolution in the ear of the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus
,” J. Comp. Physiol.
148
, 237
–244
.9.
Farris, H. E., and Hoy, R. R. (1997). “Acoustic startle and two-tone suppression in a Nemobiine cricket, Eunemobius carolinus,” 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans, 25–30 October 1997, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, Vol. 23, p. 1070.
10.
Farris, H. E., and Hoy, R. R. (1998). “Two-tone suppression of the ultrasound induced startle response in a cricket,” Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Acoustics and the 135th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Seattle, WA, Vol. 2, pp. 687–688.
11.
Farris
, H. E.
, and Hoy
, R. R.
(2000
). “Ultrasound sensitivity in the cricket, Eunemobius carolinus (Gryllidae: Nemobiinae)
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
, 1727
–1736
.12.
Farris
, H. E.
, Forrest
, T. G.
, and Hoy
, R. R.
(1997
). “The effects of calling song spacing and intensity on the attraction of flying crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Nemobiinae)
,” J. Insect Behav.
10
, 639
–653
.13.
Fletcher
, H.
(1940
). “Auditory patterns
,” Rev. Mod. Phys.
12
, 47
–65
.14.
Fuzessery, Z. M. (1988). “Frequency tuning in the anuran central auditory system,” in The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System, edited by B. Fritzsch, M. J. Ryan, W. Wilczynski, T. E. Hetherington, and W. Walkowiak (Wiley, New York).
15.
Hutchings
, M.
, and Lewis
, B.
(1984
). “The role of two-tone suppression in song coding by ventral cord neurones in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus (Le Guillou)
,” J. Comp. Physiol., A
154
, 103
–112
.16.
Imaizumi
, K.
, and Pollack
, G. S.
(1999
). “Neural coding of sound frequency by cricket auditory receptors
,” J. Neurosci.
19
, 1508
–1516
.17.
Kiang, N. Y-S. (1965). “Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat’s auditory nerve,” Research Monograph No. 35 (MIT, Cambridge, MA).
18.
Levitt
, H.
(1971
). “Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
49
, 467
–477
.19.
Loher
, W.
, Weber
, T.
, and Huber
, F.
(1993
). “The effect of mating on phonotactic behaviour in Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer)
,” Physiol. Entomol.
18
, 57
–66
.20.
Moiseff
, A.
, and Hoy
, R. R.
(1983
). “Sensitivity to ultrasound in an identified auditory interneuron in the cricket: A possible neural link to phonotactic behavior
,” J. Comp. Physiol. [A]
152
, 155
–167
.21.
Moiseff
, A.
, Pollack
, G. S.
, and Hoy
, R. R.
(1978
). “Steering responses of flying crickets to sound and ultrasound: mate attraction and predator avoidance
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
75
, 4052
–4056
.22.
Moore, B. C. J. (1995). “Frequency analysis and masking,” in Hearing, edited by B. C. J. Moore (Academic, London).
23.
Moore
, B. C. J.
, Peters
, R. W.
, and Glasberg
, B. R.
(1990
). “Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
, 132
–140
.24.
Moore
, B. C. J.
, Glasberg
, B. R.
, Plack
, C. J.
, and Biswas
, A. K.
(1988
). “The shape of the ear’s temporal window
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
, 1102
–1116
.25.
Nolen
, T. G.
, and Hoy
, R. R.
(1984
). “Initiation of behavior by single neurons: the role of behavioral context
,” Science
226
, 992
–994
.26.
Nolen
, T. G.
, and Hoy
, R. R.
(1986a
). “Phonotaxis in flying crickets. I. Attraction to the calling song and avoidance of bat-like ultrasound are discrete behaviors
,” J. Comp. Physiol., A
159
, 423
–439
.27.
Nolen
, T. G.
, and Hoy
, R. R.
(1986b
). “Phonotaxis in flying crickets. II. Physiological mechanisms of two-tone suppression of the high frequency avoidance steering behavior by the calling song
,” J. Comp. Physiol., A
159
, 441
–456
.28.
Nolen
, T. G.
, and Hoy
, R. R.
(1987
). “Postsynaptic inhibition mediates high-frequency selectivity in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: Implications for flight phonotaxis behavior
,” J. Neurosci.
7
, 2081
–2096
.29.
Patterson
, R. D.
, Nimmo-Smith
, I.
, Weber
, D. L.
, and Milroy
, R.
(1982
). “The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
, 1788
–1803
.30.
Plack, C. J., and Carlyon, R. P. (1995). “Loudness perception and intensity coding,” in Hearing, edited by B. C. J. Moore (Academic, London).
31.
Plomp
, R.
, and Bouman
, M. A.
(1959
). “Relation between hearing threshold and duration for tone pulses
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
31
, 749
–758
.32.
Robert
, D.
(1989
). “The auditory behaviour of flying locusts
,” J. Exp. Biol.
147
, 279
–301
.33.
Rose
, J. E.
, Gross
, N. B.
, Geisler
, C. D.
, and Hind
, J. E.
(1971
). “Some effects of stimulus intensity on response of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey
,” J. Neurophysiol.
34
, 685
–699
.34.
Sachs
, M. B.
, and Kiang
, N. Y.-S.
(1968
). “Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
43
, 1100
–1128
.35.
Schildberger
, K.
(1984
). “Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain
,” J. Comp. Physiol., A
155
, 171
–185
.36.
Shailer
, M. J.
, Moore
, B. C. J.
, Glasberg
, B. R.
, and Watson
, N.
(1990
). “Auditory filter shapes at 8 and 10 kHz
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
, 141
–148
.37.
Suga, N. (1973). “Feature extraction in the auditory system of bats,” in Basic Mechanisms in Hearing, edited by A. R. Moller (Academic, New York).
38.
Vogten, L. L. M. (1974). “Pure-tone masking; a new result from a new method,” in Facts and Models in Hearing, edited by E. Zwicker and E. Terhardt (Springer-Verlag, New York).
39.
Walker
, T. J.
(1962
). “Factors responsible for intraspecific variation in the calling songs of crickets
,” Evolution
16
, 407
–428
.40.
Wohlers
, D. W.
, and Huber
, F.
(1982
). “Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus L.
,” J. Comp. Physiol.
146
, 161
–173
.41.
Wyttenbach
, R. A.
, May
, M. L.
, and Hoy
, R. R.
(1996
). “Categorical perception of sound frequency by crickets
,” Science
273
, 1542
–1544
.42.
Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 Acoustical Society of America.
2002
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
