The relation between auditory filters estimated from psychophysical methods and peripheral tuning was evaluated using a computational auditory-nerve (AN) model that included many of the response properties associated with nonlinear cochlear tuning. The phenomenological AN model included the effects of dynamic level-dependent tuning, compression, and suppression on the responses of high-, medium-, and low-spontaneous-rate AN fibers. Signal detection theory was used to evaluate psychophysical performance limits imposed by the random nature of AN discharges and by random-noise stimuli. The power-spectrum model of masking was used to estimate psychophysical auditory filters from predicted AN-model detection thresholds for a tone signal in fixed-level notched-noise maskers. Results demonstrate that the role of suppression in broadening peripheral tuning in response to the noise masker has implications for the interpretation of psychophysical auditory-filter estimates. Specifically, the estimated psychophysical auditory-filter equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) that were derived from the nonlinear AN model with suppression always overestimated the ERBs of the low-level peripheral model filters. Further, this effect was larger for an 8-kHz signal than for a 2-kHz signal, suggesting a potential characteristic-frequency (CF) dependent bias in psychophysical estimates of auditory filters due to the increase in strength of cochlear nonlinearity with increases in CF.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
February 2002
February 01 2002
Quantifying the implications of nonlinear cochlear tuning for auditory-filter estimates Available to Purchase
Michael G. Heinz;
Michael G. Heinz
Speech and Hearing Sciences Program, Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
and Hearing Research Center, Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Search for other works by this author on:
H. Steven Colburn;
H. Steven Colburn
Hearing Research Center, Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Search for other works by this author on:
Laurel H. Carney
Laurel H. Carney
Hearing Research Center, Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael G. Heinz
,
H. Steven Colburn
Laurel H. Carney
Speech and Hearing Sciences Program, Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 996–1011 (2002)
Article history
Received:
April 25 2001
Accepted:
November 19 2001
Citation
Michael G. Heinz, H. Steven Colburn, Laurel H. Carney; Quantifying the implications of nonlinear cochlear tuning for auditory-filter estimates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 February 2002; 111 (2): 996–1011. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1436071
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 1993)
Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1992)
Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and forward masking
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1981)
Rate and timing cues associated with the cochlear amplifier: Level discrimination based on monaural cross-frequency coincidence detection
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2001)
Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 1986)