Previous studies have shown that, during continuous vocalization, voice fundamental frequency (voice F0) is modified by frequency-shifted auditory feedback. In this study, the effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours were determined for the first two syllables of the nonsense word [tatatas]. Results show that voice F0 is auditorily controlled with a long latency and responses are not interrupted by the onset and offset of phonation itself. Furthermore, after-effects were found in voice F0 in trials after the termination of the frequency shift, which indicates that the response persists for several seconds. It is argued that the purpose of the auditory-vocal system is not to control voice F0 precisely within single syllables, but rather on a supra-segmental level in the context of prosody.

1.
Bosshardt
,
H. G.
,
Sappok
,
C.
,
Knipschild
,
M.
, and
Hölscher
,
C.
(
1997
). “
Spontaneous imitation of fundamental frequency and speech rate by nonstutterers and stutterers
,”
J Psych. Ling. Res.
26
,
425
448
.
2.
Burnett
,
T. A.
,
Senner
,
J. E.
, and
Larson
,
C. R.
(
1997
). “
Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: A preliminary study
,”
J. Voice
11
,
202
211
.
3.
Burnett
,
T. A.
,
Freedland
,
M. B.
,
Larson
,
C. R.
, and
Hain
,
T. C.
(
1998
). “
Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3153
3161
.
4.
Childers
,
D. G.
,
and
Krishnamurthy
,
A. K.
(
1984
). “
A critical review of electroglottography
,”
CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.
12
,
131
161
.
5.
Coleman
,
R. F.
,
and
Markham
,
I. W.
(
1991
). “
Normal variations in habitual pitch
,”
J. Voice
5
,
173
177
.
6.
Cutler
,
A.
,
Dahan
,
D.
, and
van Donselaar
,
W.
(
1997
). “
Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review
,”
Lang Speech
40
,
141
201
.
7.
Donath, T., Natke, U., and Kalveram, K. T. (2001). “Magnitude and latency of fundamental frequency response within syllables under frequency shifted auditory feedback and public speaking,” in Speech Motor Control in Normal and Disordered Speech, Proceedings 4th International Speech Motor Conference (61–64), Nijmegen, The Netherlands, edited by B. Maassen, W. Hulstijn, R. D. Kent, and P. H. H. M. Van Lieshout (Uitgeverij Vantilt, The Netherlands).
8.
Eady
,
S. J.
(
1982
). “
Differences in the F0 patterns of speech: Tone language versus stress language
,”
Lang. Speech
25
,
29
41
.
9.
Elman
,
J. L.
(
1981
). “
Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
70
,
45
50
.
10.
Giles, H., and Powesland, P. E. (1975). Speech Style and Social Evaluation (Academic, London).
11.
Held
,
R.
(
1965
). “
Plasticity in sensory-motor systems
,”
Sci. Am.
213
,
84
94
.
12.
Jones
,
J. A.
,
and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2000
). “
Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
1246
1251
.
13.
Larson
,
C. R.
(
1998
). “
Cross-modality influences in speech motor control: The use of pitch-shifting for the study of F0 control
,”
J. Commun. Dis.
31
,
489
503
.
14.
Larson
,
C. R.
,
Burnett
,
T. A.
, and
Kiran
,
S.
(
2000
). “
Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice F0 responses
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
559
564
.
15.
Natke
,
U.
,
and
Kalveram
,
K. T.
(
2001
). “
Fundamental frequency under frequency shifted auditory feedback of long stressed and unstressed syllables
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
44
,
577
584
.
16.
Natke
,
U.
,
Grosser
,
J.
, and
Kalveram
,
K. T.
(
2001
). “
Fluency, fundamental frequency, and speech rate under frequency-shifted auditory feedback in stuttering and nonstuttering persons
,”
J. Fluency Disord.
26
,
227
241
.
17.
Parlitz, D., and Pangert, M. (1998) “Short and medium motor responses to pitch shift: Latency measurements of the professional musicians’s audio-motor loop for intonation,” paper presented at the 16th International Congress on Acoustics and the 137th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Seattle, WA.
18.
Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, Boston).
19.
Sundberg, J. (1987). The Science of the Singing Voice (Northern Illinois U.P., Dekalb, IL).
20.
Sundberg J., Iwarsson J., and Billström, A. H. (1993). “Significance of mechanoreceptors in the subglottal mucosa for subglottal pressure control in singers,” presented at the 22nd Annual Symposium Care of the Professional Voice, Philadelphia.
21.
Tanabe
,
M.
,
Kitajima
,
K.
, and
Gould
,
W.
(
1975
). “
Laryngeal phonatory reflex: The effect of anesthetization of the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve-Acoustic aspects
,”
Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.
84
,
206
212
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.