Habitat characteristics that affect transmission and degradation of acoustical signals should influence strongly the evolution of bird songs. In this study propagation properties of songs of five antbird species were measured in a rainforest in southern Venezuela. The investigated species (Myrmothera campanisona, Thamnophilus aethiops, Thamnophilus amazonicus, Myrmotherula axillaris, and Herpsilochmus dorsimaculatus) use different song post heights at all levels of the rainforest. Because there is a height-specific pattern in degradation, it is hypothesized that their songs are adapted to species-specific transmission paths. To test this assumption, transmission parameters (excess attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio, and blur ratio) were measured for the songs at five different heights and at three different distances. In three of the five species, the results indicate a strong influence of environmental conditions on the design of the vocalizations. Degradation was minimized by the concentration of the signal to a narrower frequency range, the usage of lower frequencies, or a slower time structure for the songs near the ground. The results are discussed in relation to acoustical models of sound propagation and physiology, and it is suggested that height-dependent degradation within a forest is an important selection pressure for transmissibility in avian communication.
REFERENCES
1.
Badyaev
, A. V.
, and Leaf
, E. S.
(1997
). “Habitat Associations of Song Characteristics in Phylloscopus and Hippolais Warblers
,” Auk
114
, 40
–46
.2.
Beecher
, M. D.
(1988
). “Spectographic analysis of animal vocalizations: implications of the ‘uncertainty principlé,’
” Bioacoustics
1
, 187
–208
.3.
Bowman
, R. I.
(1979
). “Adaptive morphology of song dialects in Darwin Finches
,” J. Ornith.
120
, 353
–380
.4.
Catchpole, C. K., and Slater, P. J. B. (1995). Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations (Cambridge U. P., London), pp. 115–187.
5.
Chappuis
, C.
(1971
). “Un exemple de l’influence du milieu sur les émissions vocales des oiseaux: Lévolution des chants en forêt équatoriale
,” Terre et Vie
2
, 183
–202
.6.
Cosens
, S. E.
, and Falls
, J. B.
(1984
). “A comparison of sound propagation and song frequency in temporal marsh and grassland habitats
,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
15
, 161
–170
.7.
Dabelsteen
, T.
, and Pedersen
, S. P.
(1985
). “A method for computerized modification of certain animal sounds for communication study purposes
,” Biol. Cybern.
52
, 399
–404
.8.
Dabelsteen
, T.
, Larsen
, O. N.
, and Pedersen
, S. B.
(1993
). “Habitat-induced degradation of sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
, 2206
–2220
.9.
Dooling
, R. J.
, and Searcy
, M. H.
(1985
). “Temporal integration of acoustic signals by the Budgerigar
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
, 1917
–1920
.10.
Dunning, J. B. (1993). “Body masses of birds of the world,” in CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses, edited by J. B. Dunning (CRC, London), pp. 3–332.
11.
Ellinger, N. (in press). “The acoustic characteristics of the lowland rainforest at the Suromoni study site,” Bioacoustics.
12.
Embleton
, T. F. W.
(1996
). “Tutorial on sound propagation outdoors
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
, 31
–48
.13.
Gould
, S. J.
, and Lewontin
, R. C.
(1979
). “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the adaptionist programmme
,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B
205
, 581
–598
.14.
Holland
, J.
, Dabelsteen
, T.
, and Pedersen
, S. B.
, (1998
). “Degradation of wren Troglodytes troglodytes song: Implication for information transfer and ranging
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
, 2154
–2166
.15.
Holland
, J.
, Dabelsteen
, T.
, Bjern
, C. P.
, and Perdersen
, S. B.
(2001
). “The location of ranging cues in wren song: evidence from calibrated interactive playback experiments
,” Behaviour
138
, 189
–206
.16.
Jilka
, A.
, and Leisler
, B.
(1974
). “Die Einpassung dreier Rohrsängerarten (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus, A. scirpaceus, A. arundinaceus) in ihre Lebensräume in Bezug auf das Frequenzspektrum ihrer Reviergesänge
,” J. Ornith.
115
, 192
–212
.17.
Klump, G. M. (1996). “Bird communication in the noisy world,” in Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, edited by D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Cornell U. P., Ithaca), pp 321–338.
18.
Klump
, G. M.
, and Maier
, E. H.
(1990
). “Temporal summation in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris)
,” J. Comp. Psychol.
104
, 94
–100
.19.
Krimbas
, C. B.
(1984
). “On adaptation, neo-Darwinian tautology, and population fitness
,” Evol. Biol.
17
, 1
–57
.20.
Lemon
, R. E.
, Struger
, J.
, Lechowicz
, M. J.
, and Norman
, R. F.
(1981
). “Song features and singing heights of American warblers: Maximization or optimization of distance
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
69
, 1169
–1176
.21.
Marten
, K.
, Quine
, D.
, and Marler
, P.
(1977
). “Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization II. Tropical forest habitats
,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
2
, 291
–302
.22.
McGregor
, P. K.
, and Krebs
, J. A.
(1984
). “Sound degradation as distance cue in Great Tit (Parus major)
,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
16
, 49
–56
.23.
Morton
, E. S.
(1975
). “Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds
,” Am. Nat.
109
, 17
–43
.24.
Morton, E. S. (1982). “Grading, Discreteness, Redundancy and Motivation-Structural Rules,” in Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 1, edited by D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Academic, Ithaca), pp. 183–210.
25.
Morton
, E. S.
(1986
). “Prediction from the ranging hypothesis for the evolution of long distance signals in birds
,” Behaviour
99
, 65
–86
.26.
Morton
, E. S.
, and Derrickson
, K. C.
(1996
). “Song ranging by the dusky antbird, Cercomacra tyrannina: ranging without song learning
,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
39
, 195
–201
.27.
Nottebohm
, F.
(1975
). “Continental patterns of song variability in Zonotrichia capensis: some possible ecological correlates
,” Am. Nat.
115
, 605
–624
.28.
Reeve
, H. K.
, and Sherman
, P. W.
(1993
). “Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research
,” Q. Rev. Biol.
68
, 1
–32
.29.
Richards
, D. G.
(1981
). “Estimation of distance of singing conspecifics by the Carolina wren
,” Auk
98
, 127
–133
.30.
Richards
, D. G.
, and Wiley
, R. H.
(1980
). “Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest. Implications for animal communication
,” Am. Nat.
108
, 17
–34
.31.
Ridgely, R. S., and Tudor, G. (1994). The Birds of South America. The Suboscine Passerines, 2nd ed. (Oxford U. P., Oxford).
32.
Ryan
, M. J.
, and Brenowitz
, E. A.
(1985
). “The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song
,” Am. Nat.
126
, 87
–100
.33.
Shy
, E.
, and Morton
, E. S.
(1986
). “Adaptation of amplitude structure of songs to propagation in field habitat in song sparrows
,” Ethology
72
, 177
–184
.34.
Sorjonen
, J.
(1983
). “Transmission of the two most characteristic phrases of the song of the thrush nightingale Luscinia luscinia in different environmental conditions
,” Orn. Scand.
14
, 278
–282
.35.
Wallschläger
, D.
(1980
). “Correlation of song frequency and body weight in passerine birds
,” Experientia
36
, 412
.36.
Wempen, J. (1986). “Outdoor sound propagation close to the ground,” in Sound Propagation in Forested Areas and Shelterbeds, edited by M. J. M. Martens (Faculty of Sciences, Catholic University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands), pp. 83–106.
37.
Wiley
, R. H.
(1991
). “Association of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America
,” Am. Nat.
138
, 973
–993
.38.
Wiley
R. H.
, and Richards
, D. G.
(1978
). “Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations
,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
3
, 69
–94
.39.
Wiley, R. H., and Richards, D. G. (1982). “Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection,” in Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 1, edited by D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Academic, Ithaca), pp. 131–181.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 Acoustical Society of America.
2001
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
