Zurek (1980) measured listeners’ sensitivities to interaural disparities conveyed by a 5-ms “probe” segment embedded within a 50-ms burst of otherwise diotic broadband noise [P. M. Zurek, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 952–964 (1980)]. He found that thresholds for interaural time delay (ITD) and interaural intensitive difference (IID) were markedly elevated when the onset of the probe segment occurred between 1 and 5 ms after the onset of the burst. Zurek postulated that this occurred because the leading portion of the noise briefly inhibited sensitivity to subsequent binaural information. If such inhibition were the primary factor responsible for the elevation in thresholds, then the omission of the portion of the noise trailing the probe segment would be expected to have little, if any, influence on performance. In order to test this hypothesis, listeners’ sensitivities to ITD and IID were measured using a paradigm similar to that employed by Zurek. The results revealed that the omission of either the leading or the trailing portions of the diotic noise led to substantial reductions in threshold ITDs and IIDs. The data were successfully accounted for by a model based upon a combination of a temporal window with an equivalent rectangular duration of approximately 10 ms and a weighting function representing a brief loss of binaural sensitivity just after the onset of a sound.

1.
Akeroyd M. A., and Summerfield, Q. (1998). “Predictions of signal thresholds in frozen-noise masker using monaural and binaural windows,” in Psychological and Physiological Advances in Hearing, edited by A. Palmer, A. Rees, Q. Summerfield, and R. Meddis (Whurr, London, 1998).
2.
Akeroyd
,
M. A.
, and
Summerfield
,
A. Q.
(
1999
). “
A binaural analog of gap detection
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
2807
2820
.
3.
ANSI (1969). ANSI S4.6-1969, “Specifications for audiometers” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
4.
Aoki
,
A.
, and
Houtgast
,
T.
(
1992
). “
A precedence effect in the perception of inter-aural cross-correlation
,”
Hear. Res.
59
,
25
30
.
5.
Bernstein
,
L. R.
,
Trahiotis
,
C.
,
Akeroyd
,
M. A.
, and
Hartung
,
K.
(
2001
). “
Sensitivity to brief changes of interaural time and interaural intensity
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
1604
1615
.
6.
Blauert, J. (1997). Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization (MIT Press, Cambridge).
7.
Culling
,
J. F.
, and
Summerfield
,
Q.
(
1998
). “
Measurements of the binaural temporal window using a detection task
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3540
3553
.
8.
Freyman
,
R. L.
,
Clifton
,
R. K.
, and
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
(
1991
). “
Dynamic processes in the precedence effect
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
874
884
.
9.
Grantham
,
D. W.
, and
Wightman
,
F. L.
(
1978
). “
Detectability of varying interaural temporal differences
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
,
511
523
.
10.
Grantham
,
D. W.
, and
Wightman
,
F. L.
(
1979
). “
Detectability of a pulsed tone in the presence of a masker with time-varying interaural correlation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
65
,
1509
1517
.
11.
Holube
,
I.
,
Kinkel
,
M.
, and
Kollmeier
,
B.
(
1998
). “
Binaural and monaural auditory filter bandwidths and time constants on probe-tone detection experiments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
2412
2425
.
12.
Houtgast
,
T.
, and
Aoki
,
S.
(
1994
). “
Stimulus-onset dominance in the perception of binaural information
,”
Hear. Res.
72
,
29
36
.
13.
Kollmeier
,
B.
, and
Gilkey
,
R. H.
(
1990
). “
Binaural forward and backward masking: Evidence for sluggishness in binaural detection
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
1709
1719
.
14.
Levitt
,
H.
(
1971
). “
Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
49
,
467
477
.
15.
Lindemann
,
W.
(
1986
). “
Extension of a binaural cross-correlation model by contralateral inhibition
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
1623
1630
.
16.
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
,
Colburn
,
H. S.
,
Yost
,
W. A.
, and
Guzman
,
S. J.
(
1999
). “
The precedence effect
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
1633
1654
.
17.
Saberi
,
K.
(
1995
). “
Some considerations on the use of adaptive methods for estimating interaural-delay thresholds
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
1803
1806
.
18.
Shinn Cunningham
,
B. G.
,
Zurek
,
P. M.
, and
Durlach
,
N. I.
(
1993
). “
Adjustment and discrimination measurements of the precedence effect
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2923
2932
.
19.
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
,
Zurek
,
P. M.
,
Durlach
,
N. I.
, and
Clifton
,
R. K.
(
1995
). “
Cross-frequency interactions in the precedence effect
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
164
171
.
20.
Tollin, D. J. (1998). “Computational model of the lateralization of clicks and their echoes,” in Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Computational Hearing, Lucca, Italy, 1–12 July 1998, edited by S. Greenberg and M. Slaney, pp. 77–82.
21.
Tollin
,
D. J.
, and
Henning
,
G. B.
(
1998
). “
Some aspects of the lateralization of echoed sound in man. I. The classical interaural-delay based precedence effect
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
3030
3038
.
22.
Zurek
,
P. M.
(
1980
). “
The precedence effect and its possible role in the avoidance of interaural ambiguities
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
,
952
964
.
23.
Zurek, P. M. (1987). “The precedence effect,” in Directional Hearing, edited by W. A. Yost and G. Gourevitch (Springer-Verlag, New York).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.