Spatial unmasking of speech has traditionally been studied with target and masker at the same, relatively large distance. The present study investigated spatial unmasking for configurations in which the simulated sources varied in azimuth and could be either near or far from the head. Target sentences and speech-shaped noise maskers were simulated over headphones using head-related transfer functions derived from a spherical-head model. Speech reception thresholds were measured adaptively, varying target level while keeping the masker level constant at the “better” ear. Results demonstrate that small positional changes can result in very large changes in speech intelligibility when sources are near the listener as a result of large changes in the overall level of the stimuli reaching the ears. In addition, the difference in the target-to-masker ratios at the two ears can be substantially larger for nearby sources than for relatively distant sources. Predictions from an existing model of binaural speech intelligibility are in good agreement with results from all conditions comparable to those that have been tested previously. However, small but important deviations between the measured and predicted results are observed for other spatial configurations, suggesting that current theories do not accurately account for speech intelligibility for some of the novel spatial configurations tested.

1.
ANSI (1969). ANSI 53.5-1969, “American National Standard Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation Index” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
2.
ANSI (1997). ANSI 53.5-1997, “Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
3.
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
(
2000
). “
The cocktail party phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions
,”
Acustica
86
,
117
128
.
4.
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1988
). “
The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
1508
1516
.
5.
Bronkhorst
,
A. W.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1990
). “
A clinical test for the assessment of binaural speech perception in noise
,”
Audiology
29
,
275
285
.
6.
Brown, T. J. (2000). “Characterization of Acoustic Head-Related Transfer Functions for Nearby Sources,” M.Eng. thesis, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
7.
Brungart
,
D. S.
, and
Rabinowitz
,
W. M.
(
1999
). “
Auditory localization of nearby sources. I. Head-related transfer functions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
1465
1479
.
8.
Colburn
,
H. S.
(
1977a
). “
Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
,
525
533
.
9.
Colburn
,
H. S.
(
1977b
). “
Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
525
533
.
See Aip Document No. E-PAPS JASMA-6-525-98.
10.
Dirks
,
D. D.
, and
Wilson
,
R. H.
(
1969
). “
The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
12
,
5
38
.
11.
Duda, R. O., and Martens, W. L. (1997). “Range-dependence of the HRTF for a spherical head,” IEEE ASSP Workshop on Applications of DSP to Audio and Acoustics.
12.
Durlach, N. I., and Colburn, H. S. (1978). “Binaural phenomena,” in Handbook of Perception, edited by E. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman (Academic, New York), Vol. 4, pp. 365–466.
13.
Fletcher
,
H.
, and
Galt
,
R. H.
(
1950
). “
The perception of speech and its relation to telephony
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
22
,
89
151
.
14.
Good, M. D., Gilkey, R. H., and Ball, J. M. (1997). “The relation between detection in noise and localization in noise in the free field,” in Binaural and Spatial Hearing in Real and Virtual Environments, edited by R. Gilkey and T. Anderson (Erlbaum, New York), pp. 349–376.
15.
Hawley, M. L. (2000). “Speech Intelligibility, Localization and Binaural Hearing in Listeners with Normal and Impaired Hearing,” Ph.D. dissertation, Biomedical Engineering, Boston University.
16.
Hawley
,
M. L.
,
Litovsky
,
R. Y.
, and
Colburn
,
H. S.
(
1999
). “
Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
3436
3448
.
17.
Hirsh
,
I. J.
(
1950
). “
The relation between localization and intelligibility
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
22
,
196
200
.
18.
IEEE
(
1969
). “
IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements
,”
IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust.
17
(
3
),
225
246
.
19.
Kryter
,
K. D.
(
1962
). “
Methods for the calculations and use of the Articulation Index
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
,
1689
1697
.
20.
MacKeith
,
N. W.
, and
Coles
,
R. R. A.
(
1971
). “
Binaural advantages in hearing of speech
,”
J. Laryngol. Otol.
85
,
213
232
.
21.
Pavlovic
,
C. V.
(
1987
). “
Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
413
422
.
22.
Peissig
,
J.
, and
Kollmeier
,
B.
(
1997
). “
Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
1660
1670
.
23.
Plomp
,
R.
, and
Mimpen
,
A. M.
(
1981
). “
Effect of the orientation of the speaker’s head and the azimuth on a noise source on the speech reception thresholds for sentences
,”
Acustica
48
,
325
328
.
24.
Rabinowitz
,
W. R.
,
Maxwell
,
J.
Shao
,
Y.
, and
Wei
,
M.
(
1993
). “
Sound localization cues for a magnified head: Implications from sound diffraction about a rigid sphere
,”
Presence
2
(
2
),
125
129
.
25.
Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2000). “Distance cues for virtual auditory space,” in Proceedings of the IEEE-PCM 2000, pp. 227–230, Sydney, Australia, 13–15 December.
26.
Shinn-Cunningham
,
B. G.
,
Santarelli
,
S.
, and
Kopčo
,
N.
(
2000
). “
Tori of confusion: Binaural localization cues for sources within reach of a listener
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
1627
1636
.
27.
Zurek, P. M. (1993). “Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility,” in Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, edited by G. Studebaker and I. Hochberg (College-Hill, Boston).
This content is only available via PDF.

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.