Fletcher has proposed the use of a logarithmic frequency scale such that the frequency level equals the number of octaves, tones, or semitones that a given frequency lies above a reference frequency of 16.35 cycles/sec., a frequency which is in the neighborhood of that producing the lowest pitch audible to the average ear. The merits of such a scale are here briefly discussed, and arguments are presented in favor of this choice of reference frequency. Using frequency level as a count of octaves or semitones from the reference C0, a rational system of subscript notation follows logically for the designation of musical tones without the aid of staff notation. In addition to certain conveniences such as uniformity of characters and simplicity of subscripts (the eight C's of the piano, for example, are represented by C1 to C8) this method shows by a glance at the subscript the frequency level of a given tone counted in octaves from the reference . From middle C4, frequency 261.63 cycles/sec., the interval is four octaves to the reference frequency, so that below C4 there are roughly four octaves of audible sound. Various subdivisions of the octave are considered in the light of their ease of calculation and significance, and the semitone, including its hundredth part, the cent, is shown to be particularly suitable. Consequently, for general use in which a unit smaller than the octave is necessary it is recommended that frequency level counted in semitones from the reference frequency be employed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 1939
July 01 1939
Terminology for Logarithmic Frequency Units
Robert W. Young
Robert W. Young
C. G. Conn, Ltd., Elkhart, Indiana
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 11, 134–139 (1939)
Article history
Received:
May 01 1939
Citation
Robert W. Young; Terminology for Logarithmic Frequency Units. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 July 1939; 11 (1): 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1916017
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Co-speech head nods are used to enhance prosodic prominence at different levels of narrow focus in French
Christopher Carignan, Núria Esteve-Gibert, et al.
Source and propagation modelling scenarios for environmental impact assessment: Model verification
Michael A. Ainslie, Robert M. Laws, et al.
Related Content
Vague terminology and pedagogy
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2023)
Acoustic Spectrum Terminology
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 1953)
Role of consistent terminology in XPS reproducibility
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A (April 2020)
A review on bystanders terminologies in cyberbullying
AIP Conference Proceedings (November 2022)
A semantic study of ‘warfare’ video game terminologies
AIP Conf. Proc. (April 2023)