This article introduces a new model that predicts speech intelligibility based on statistical decision theory. This model, which we call the speech recognition sensitivity (SRS) model, aims to predict speech-recognition performance from the long-term average speech spectrum, the masking excitation in the listener’s ear, the linguistic entropy of the speech material, and the number of response alternatives available to the listener. A major difference between the SRS model and other models with similar aims, such as the articulation index, is this model’s ability to account for synergetic and redundant interactions among spectral bands of speech. In the SRS model, linguistic entropy affects intelligibility by modifying the listener’s identification sensitivity to the speech. The effect of the number of response alternatives on the test score is a direct consequence of the model structure. The SRS model also appears to predict the differential effect of linguistic entropy on filter condition and the interaction between linguistic entropy, signal-to-noise ratio, and language proficiency.
REFERENCES
1.
Allen
, J. B.
(1994
). “How do humans process and recognize speech
,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.
2
, 567
–577
.2.
ANSI (1969). ANSI S3.5-1969 “Methods for the calculation of the articulation index” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
3.
ANSI (1997). ANSI S3.5-1997 “Methods for calculation of the speech intelligibility index” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
4.
Beranek
, L. L.
(1947
). “The design of speech communication systems
,” Proc. IRE
35
, 880
–890
.5.
Boothroyd, A. (2000). Personal communication.
6.
Ching
, T. Y.
, Dillon
, H.
, and Byrne
, D.
(1998
). “Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
, 1128
–1140
.7.
Dau
, T.
, Püschel
, D.
, and Kohlrausch
, A.
(1996
). “A quantitative model of the ‘effective’ signal processing in the auditory system. II. Simulations and measurements
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
, 3623
–3631
.8.
Dubno
, J. R.
, Dirks
, D. D.
, and Schaefer
, A. B.
(1989
). “Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
, 355
–364
.9.
Dubno
, J. R.
, Ahlstrom
, J. B.
, and Horwitz
, A. R.
(2000a
). “Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
, 538
–546
.10.
Dubno, J. R., Horwitz, A. R., and Ahlstrom, J. B. (2000b). “Speech recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: Decreases in scores and increases in masking,” in Proc. IHCON (Int. Hear. Aid. Res. Conf.) 2000, p. 58.
11.
Durlach
, N. I.
, and Braida
, L. D.
(1969
). “Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
46
, 372
–383
.12.
Durlach
, N. I.
, Braida
, L. D.
, and Ito
, Y.
(1986
). “Towards a model for discrimination of broadband signals
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
, 63
–72
.13.
Fletcher
, H.
, and Galt
, R. H.
(1950
). “The perception of speech and its relation to telephony
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
22
, 89
–151
.14.
Florentine, M. (1985). “Non-native listeners’ perception of American English in noise,” in Proceedings of Inter-Noise ’85, pp. 1021–1024.
15.
French
, N. R.
, and Steinberg
, J. C.
(1947
). “Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
19
, 90
–119
.16.
Grant
, K. W.
, and Braida
, L. D.
(1991
). “Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual input
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
, 2952
–2960
.17.
Green, D. M., and Birdsall, T. G. (1958). “The effect of vocabulary size on articulation score,” Technical Memorandum No. 81 and Technical Note AFCRC-TR-57-58, University of Michigan: Electronic Defense Group.
18.
Hartmann, W. M. (1998). Signals, Sound, and Sensation (Springer Verlag, New York).
19.
Hirsh
, I. J.
, Reynolds
, E. G.
, and Joseph
, M.
(1954
). “Intelligibility of different speech materials
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
26
, 530
–538
.20.
Kalikow
, D. N.
, Stevens
, K. N.
, and Elliot
, L. L.
(1977
). “Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
, 1337
–1351
.21.
Kamm
, C. A.
, Dirks
, D. D.
, and Bell
, T. S.
(1985
). “Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
, 281
–288
.22.
Kryter
, K. D.
(1960
). “Speech bandwidth compression through spectrum selection
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
32
, 547
–556
.23.
Kryter
, K. D.
(1962a
). “Methods for the calculation and use of the articulation index
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
, 1689
–1697
.24.
Kryter
, K. D.
(1962b
). “Validation of the articulation index
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
, 1698
–1702
.25.
Lippmann
, R. P.
(1996
). “Accurate consonant perception without mid-frequency speech energy
,” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.
4
, 66
–69
.26.
Mayo
, L. H.
, Florentine
, M.
, and Buus
, S.
(1997
). “Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
40
, 686
–693
.27.
Miller
, G. A.
, and Nicely
, P. E.
(1954
). “An analysis of perceptual confusion among some English consonants
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
27
, 338
–352
.28.
Miller
, G. A.
, Heise
, G. A.
, and Lichten
, W.
(1951
). “The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test material
,” J. Exp. Psychol.
41
, 329
–335
.29.
Müsch
, H.
, and Buus
, S.
(2001
). “Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. II. Measurement and prediction of consonant-discrimination performance
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
, 2910
–2920
.30.
Oxenham
, A. J.
, and Buus
, S.
(2000
). “Level discrimination of sinusoids as a function of duration and level for fixed-level, roving-level, and across-frequency conditions
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
, 1605
–1614
.31.
Pavlovic, C. V. (1993). “Problems in the prediction of speech recognition performance of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals,” in Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, edited by G. A. Studebaker and I. Hochberg (Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA), pp. 221–234.
32.
Pollack
, I.
(1959a
). “Message uncertainty and message reception
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
31
, 1500
–1508
.33.
Pollack
, I.
(1959b
). “Message repetition and message reception
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
31
, 1509
–1515
.34.
Pollack
, I.
(1964
). “Message probability and message reception
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
, 937
–945
.35.
Rankovic
, C. M.
(1991
). “An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
34
, 391
–402
.36.
Steeneken
, H. J. M.
, and Houtgast
, T.
(1980
). “A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
69
, 318
–326
.37.
Steeneken
, H. J. M.
, and Houtgast
, T.
(1999
). “Mutual dependence of octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility
,” Speech Commun.
28
, 109
–123
.38.
van Rooij
, J. C. G. M.
, and Plomp
, R.
(1991
). “The effect of linguistic entropy on speech perception in noise in young and elderly listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
, 2985
–2991
.39.
Warren
, R. M.
, and Bashford
, J. J. A.
(1999
). “Intelligibility of -octave speech: Greater contribution of frequencies outside than inside the nominal passband
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
, L47
–L52
.40.
Warren
, R. M.
, Riener
, K. R.
, Bashford
, J. J. A.
, and Brubaker
, B. S.
(1995
). “Spectral redundancy: Intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits
,” Percept. Psychophys.
57
, 175
–182
.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 Acoustical Society of America.
2001
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.