An empirical study covering a wide range of bender transducer sizes and operating frequencies is reported. A spherical device model is shown to give good account of bender performance, including interaction effects. A set of empirical rules for scaling equivalent circuit parameters according to the device geometry is identified. An effective spherical radius, approximately half the diaphragm radius, is identified for the typical bender. The effects of pressure and drive voltage on performance are described for particular devices. Sensitivity factors for the equivalent circuit parameters to the operating conditions are determined. These are related to sensitivity factors for the coupling coefficient (Kc) and electromechanical transformer turns ratio (N). Both these parameters are shown to have similar sensitivity responses, decreasing with pressure (planar stress), and increasing with voltage (electric field). The results of high drive tests carried out at Seneca Lake are reported. Values of conventional figures of merit (FOMV and FOMM), close to the highest claimed for any underwater transducer, are tabled. When allowance for the operating efficiency is included in the figure of merit definitions, the bender appears to be superior to other device types.

Topics
Acoustic transducers, Transformer
1.
W. G. Cady, Piezoelectricity (Dover, New York, 1964), p. 181.
2.
C. P.
Germano
, “
Flexure Mode Piezoelectric Transducers
,”
IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust.
AU-19
,
6
–
12
(
1971
).
Google Scholar
 
3.
R. S.
Woollett
, “
Trends and Problems in Sonar Transducer Design
,”
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Eng.
AU-10
,
116
–
124
(
1963
).
Google Scholar
 
4.
R. S. Woollett, “Theory of the Piezoelectric Flexural Disk Transducer with Application to Underwater Sound,” USL Research Report No. 490 (1960).
5.
R. S. Woollett, The Flexural Bar Transducer (NUSC, New London, CT, 1986).
6.
D. F. Jones and J. F. Lindberg, “Recent Transduction Developments in Canada and the United States,” Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, Vol. 17, Pt. 3, 1995, pp. 15–33.
7.
Piezoelectric Ceramics for Sonar Transducers, MIL-STD-1376 (SHIPS), Dec. 1970 (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).
8.
Notes on Transducer Design, A.U.W.E. Publication 20730, Jan. 1969 (Admiralty Underwater Weapons Establishment, Portland, UK). See Chap. 2.
9.
R. J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983). See the formula for “Line of n elements of equal spacing d,” p. 43.
10.
L. L. Beranek, Acoustics (American Institute of Physics, 1986). See Eq. (5.1), p. 118.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 Acoustical Society of America.
2001
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.