Anthropogenic noise impacts marine mammals in a variety of ways. In order to estimate over which ranges this happens, we first need to understand the propagation of noise through the ocean away from the noise source, and, second, understand the relationship between received noise levels and impact thresholds. A software package combining both aspects is presented. (1) A sound propagation model based on ray theory was developed to calculate received noise levels as a function of range, depth, and frequency. (2) Current knowledge of noise impact thresholds for marine mammals was gathered and included in software routines predicting zones of impact on marine mammals around industrial underwater noise sources. As input parameters, this software package requires the source level and spectrum of the noise of interest; physical oceanography data about the local ocean environment such as bathymetry, bottom and surface loss data, and sound speed profiles; and bioacoustical information about the target species in the form of an audiogram, critical auditory bandwidths, spectra of typical animal vocalizations, reported sound levels of disturbance, and criteria for hearing damage. As output, the software produces data files and plots of the zones of audibility, masking, disturbance, and potential hearing damage around a noise source.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2000
September 01 2000
A software model to estimate zones of impact on marine mammals around anthropogenic noise
Christine Erbe;
Christine Erbe
Institute of Ocean Sciences, 9860 West Saanich Road, Sidney, British Columbia V8L 4B2, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
David M. Farmer
David M. Farmer
Institute of Ocean Sciences, 9860 West Saanich Road, Sidney, British Columbia V8L 4B2, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1327–1331 (2000)
Article history
Received:
July 27 1999
Accepted:
June 16 2000
Citation
Christine Erbe, David M. Farmer; A software model to estimate zones of impact on marine mammals around anthropogenic noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 September 2000; 108 (3): 1327–1331. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1288939
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Does sound symbolism need sound?: The role of articulatory movement in detecting iconicity between sound and meaning
Mutsumi Imai, Sotaro Kita, et al.
Related Content
Detection of whale calls in noise: Performance comparison between a beluga whale, human listeners, and a neural network
J Acoust Soc Am (July 2000)
The effects of sound in the marine environment workbench: A simulation tool to predict the impact of anthropogenic sound on marine mammals
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2013)
Underwater detection of tonal signals between 0.125 and 100 kHz by harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2009)
Anthropogenic underwater sound emissions and other ecological effects on the marine environment
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
The effects of underwater noise on marine mammals.
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2011)