Recent advances in physiological data collection methods have made it possible to test the accuracy of predictions against speaker-specific vocal tracts and acoustic patterns. Vocal tract dimensions for /r/ derived via magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) for two speakers of American English [Alwan, Narayanan, and Haker, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 1078–1089 (1997)] were used to construct models of the acoustics of /r/. Because previous models have not sufficiently accounted for the very low F3 characteristic of /r/, the aim was to match formant frequencies predicted by the models to the full range of formant frequency values produced by the speakers in recordings of real words containing /r/. In one set of experiments, area functions derived from MRI data were used to argue that the Perturbation Theory of tube acoustics cannot adequately account for /r/, primarily because predicted locations did not match speakers’ actual constriction locations. Different models of the acoustics of /r/ were tested using the Maeda computer simulation program [Maeda, Speech Commun. 1, 199–299 (1982)]; the supralingual vocal-tract dimensions reported in Alwan et al. were found to be adequate at predicting only the highest of attested F3 values. By using (1) a recently developed adaptation of the Maeda model that incorporates the sublingual space as a side branch from the front cavity, and by including (2) the sublingual space as an increment to the dimensions of the front cavity, the mid-to-low values of the speakers’ F3 range were matched. Finally, a simple tube model with dimensions derived from MRI data was developed to account for cavity affiliations. This confirmed F3 as a front cavity resonance, and variations in F1,F2, and F4 as arising from mid- and back-cavity geometries. Possible trading relations for F3 lowering based on different acoustic mechanisms for extending the front cavity are also proposed.

1.
Alwan
,
A.
,
Narayanan
,
S.
, and
Haker
,
K.
(
1997
). “
Toward articulatory–acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. II. The rhotics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
1078
1089
.
2.
Boe
,
L.
, and
Perrier
,
P.
(
1990
). “
Comments on Distinctive regions and modes: A new theory of speech production
,”
Speech Commun.
7
,
217
230
.
3.
Boyce
,
S.
, and
Espy-Wilson
,
C.
(
1997
). “
Coarticulatory stability in American English /r/
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
3741
3753
.
4.
Chiba, T., and Kajiyama, M. (1941). The Vowel: Its Nature and Structure (Kaiseikan, Tokyo).
5.
Dang
,
J.
, and
Honda
,
K.
(
1997
). “
Acoustic characteristics of the piriform fossa in models and humans
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
456
465
.
6.
Delattre
,
P.
, and
Freeman
,
D.
(
1968
). “
A dialect study of American Rs by x-ray motion picture
,”
Language
44
,
29
68
.
7.
Espy-Wilson
,
C.
(
1992
). “
Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semivowels in American English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
736
757
.
8.
Espy-Wilson C. Y., Narayanan, S., Boyce, S. E., and Alwan, A. (1997). “Acoustical modeling of American English /r/,” Proceedings of Eurospeech ’97, September, Patras, Greece.
9.
Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic Theory of Speech Production (Mouton, Gravenhage).
10.
Fant
,
G.
(
1980
). “
The relations between area functions and the acoustic signal
,”
Phonetica
37
,
55
86
.
11.
Guenther
,
F. H.
,
Espy-Wilson
,
C. Y.
,
Boyce
,
S. E.
,
Matthies
,
M. L.
,
Zandipour
,
M.
, and
Perkell
,
J. S.
(
1999
). “
Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
2854
2865
.
12.
Hagiwara, R. (1995). “Acoustic realizations of American /r/ as produced by women and men,” UCLA Phonetics Laboratory Working Papers, 90.
13.
Harshman
,
R.
,
Ladefoged
,
P.
, and
Goldstein
,
L.
(
1977
). “
Factor analysis of tongue shapes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
62
,
693
707
.
14.
Heinz, J. M. (1967). “Perturbation functions for the determination of vocal-tract area functions from vocal-tract eigenvalues,” STL-QPSR 1/1967, pp. 1–14.
15.
Jackson, M., Espy-Wilson, C., and Boyce, S. (1999). “Verifying a vocal tract model with a closed side branch,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (submitted).
16.
Johnson, K. (1997). Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics (Blackwell, Cambridge).
17.
Kent, R. (1998). “Normal aspects of articulation,” in Articulation and Phonological Disorders, edited by J. Bernthal and N. Bankson (Allyn and Bacon, Boston).
18.
Lehiste, I. (1962). “Acoustical characteristics of selected English consonants,” University of Michigan Communication Sciences Laboratory Report #9.
19.
Lindau, M. (1985). “The Story of /r/,” in Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged, edited by V. A. Fromkin (Academic, Orlando), pp. 157–168.
20.
Maeda
,
S.
(
1982
). “
Digital simulation method of the vocal tract system
,”
Speech Commun.
1
,
199
299
.
21.
McGowan
,
R. S.
(
1992
). “
Tongue-tip trills and vocal-tract wall compliance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
2903
2910
.
22.
Moore
,
C.
(
1992
). “
The correspondence of vocal tract resonance with volumes obtained from magnetic resonance images
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
35
,
1009
1023
.
23.
Mrayati
,
M.
,
Carré
,
R.
, and
Guérin
,
B.
(
1988
). “
Distinctive regions and modes: A new theory of speech production
,”
Speech Commun.
7
,
257
286
.
24.
Narayanan
,
S.
,
Alwan
,
A.
, and
Haker
,
K.
(
1997
). “
Toward articulatory–acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. I. The laterals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
1064
1077
.
25.
Narayanan
,
S.
,
Byrd
,
D.
, and
Kaun
,
A.
(
1999
). “
Geometry, kinematics, and acoustics of Tamil liquid consonants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
1993
2007
.
26.
Nolan, F. (1983). The Phonetic Bases of Speaker Recognition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England).
27.
Ohala, J. (1985). “Around flat,” in Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged, edited by V. A. Fromkin (Academic, Orlando), pp. 223–241.
28.
Ong
,
D.
, and
Stone
,
M.
(
1998
). “
Reconstruction of vocal tract shape from magnetic resonance images during production of [r] and [l]
,”
Phonoscope
1
,
1
14
.
29.
Rubin
,
P.
,
Baer
,
T.
, and
Mermelstein
,
P.
(
1981
). “
An articulatory synthesizer for perceptual research
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
70
,
321
328
.
30.
Scaife, R. (1997). Personal communication.
31.
Schroeder
,
M. R.
(
1967
). “
Determination of the geometry of the human vocal tract by acoustic measurements
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
41
,
1002
1010
.
32.
Shiller
,
D.
,
Ostry
,
D.
, and
Gribble
,
P.
(
1999
). “
Effects of gravitational load on jaw movement in speech
,”
J. Neurosci.
19
,
9073
9080
.
33.
Shriberg, L., and Kent, R. (1982). Clinical Phonetics (Macmillan, New York).
34.
Stevens, K. N. (1999). Acoustic Phonetics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
35.
Story
,
B. H.
,
Titze
,
I. R.
, and
Hoffman
,
E. A.
(
1998
). “
Vocal tract area functions for an adult female speaker based on volumetric imaging
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
471
487
.
36.
Sundberg
,
J.
,
Lindblom
,
B.
, and
Liljencrants
,
J.
(
1992
). “
Formant frequency estimates for abruptly changing area functions: A comparison between calculations and measurements
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
3478
3482
.
37.
Tiede, M. (1999). Personal communication.
38.
Tiede
,
M.
,
Masaki
,
S.
,
Wakumoto
,
W.
, and
Vatikiotis-Bateson
,
E.
(
1997
). “
Magnetometer observation of articulation in sitting and supine conditions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
,
3166
.
39.
Veatch, T. C. (1991). “English vowels: Their surface phonology and phonetic implementation in vernacular dialects,” University of Pennsylvania Ph.D. dissertation.
40.
Westbury
,
J. R.
,
Hashi
,
M.
, and
Lindstrom
,
M. J.
(
1999
). “
Differences among speakers in lingual articulation of American English /r/
,”
Speech Commun.
26
,
203
226
.
41.
Yang, C. S., and Kasuya, H. (1994). “Accurate measurement of vocal tract shapes from magnetic resonance images of child, female, and male subjects,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 623–626 (unpublished).
42.
Zawadaski
,
P.
, and
Kuehn
,
D.
(
1980
). “
A cineradiographic study of static and dynamic aspects of American English /r/
,”
Phonetica
37
,
253
266
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.