The relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition in subjects with normal hearing or mild sensorineural hearing loss were explored in two studies. In the first study, gap thresholds were obtained for 40 younger and 40 older subjects. The gaps were carried by 150-ms, modulated, low-pass noise bursts with cutoff frequencies of 1 or 6 kHz. The noise bursts were presented at an overall level of 80 dB SPL in three background conditions. Mean gap thresholds ranged between 2.6 and 7.8 ms for the younger age group and between 3.4 and 10.0 ms for the older group. Mean gap thresholds were significantly larger for the older group in all six conditions. Gap thresholds were not significantly correlated with audiometric thresholds in either age group but the 1-kHz gap thresholds increased with age in the younger group. In the second study, the relationships among gap thresholds, spondee-in-babble thresholds, and audiometric thresholds of 66 subjects were examined. Compared with the older subjects, the younger group recognized the spondees at significantly lower (more difficult) spondee-to-babble ratios. In the younger group, spondee-in-babble thresholds were significantly correlated with gap thresholds in conditions of high-frequency masking. In the older group, spondee-in-babble thresholds, gap thresholds, and audiometric thresholds were not significantly correlated, but the spondee-in-babble thresholds and two audiometric thresholds increased significantly with age. These results demonstrate that significant age-related changes in auditory processing occur throughout adulthood. Specifically, age-related changes in temporal acuity may begin decades earlier than age-related changes in word recognition.

1.
ANSI (1989). ANSI S3.6-1989, “Specifications for Audiometers” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
2.
Barr
,
R. A.
, and
Giambra
,
L. M.
(
1990
). “
Age-related decrement in auditory selective attention
,”
Psychol. Aging
5
,
597
599
.
3.
Boettcher
,
F. A.
,
Mills
,
J. H.
,
Swerdloff
,
J. L.
, and
Holley
,
B. L.
(
1996
). “
Auditory evoked potentials in aged gerbils: Responses elicited by noises separated by a silent gap
,”
Hear. Res.
102
,
167
178
.
4.
Cheesman
,
M. F.
(
1992
). “
An automated technique for estimating speech reception thresholds in multi-talker babble
,”
JSLPA
16
,
223
227
.
5.
Cohen
,
J.
(
1992
). “
A power primer
,”
Psychol. Bull.
112
,
155
159
.
6.
Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics (CHABA): Working Group on Speech Understanding (
1988
). “
Speech understanding and aging
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
859
895
.
7.
Divenyi
,
P. L.
, and
Haupt
,
K. M.
(
1997a
). “
Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. I. Age and lateral asymmetry effects
,”
Ear Hear.
18
,
42
61
.
8.
Divenyi
,
P. L.
, and
Haupt
,
K. M.
(
1997b
). “
Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. II. Correlation analysis
,”
Ear Hear.
18
,
100
113
.
9.
Divenyi
,
P. L.
, and
Haupt
,
K. M.
(
1997c
). “
Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. III. Factor representation
,”
Ear Hear.
18
,
189
201
.
10.
Drullman
,
R.
(
1995
). “
Speech intelligibility in noise: Relative contribution of speech elements above and below the noise level
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
1796
1798
.
11.
Fitzgibbons
,
P. J.
, and
Gordon-Salant
,
S.
(
1996
). “
Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
7
,
183
189
.
12.
Frisina
,
D. R.
, and
Frisina
,
R. D.
(
1997
). “
Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: Relations to possible neural mechanisms
,”
Hear. Res.
106
,
95
104
.
13.
Hadi
,
A. S.
(
1994
). “
A modification of a method for the detection of outliers in multivariate samples
,”
J. R. Stat. Soc. Series. B.
56
, No. 2.
14.
Humes
,
L. E.
,
Watson
,
B. U.
,
Christensen
,
L. A.
,
Cokely
,
C. G.
,
Halling
,
D. C.
, and
Lee
,
L.
(
1994
). “
Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
37
,
465
474
.
15.
Ison
,
J. R.
,
Agrawal
,
P.
,
Pak
,
J.
, and
Vaughn
,
W. J.
(
1998
). “
Changes in temporal acuity with age and with hearing impairment in the mouse: A study of the acoustic startle reflex and its inhibition by brief decrements in noise level
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
1696
1704
.
16.
Lutman
,
M. E.
(
1991
). “
Degradations in frequency and temporal resolution with age and their impact on speech identification
,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol. Suppl.
476
,
120
126
.
17.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Peters
,
R. W.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1992
). “
Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by elderly subjects with and without hearing loss
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
1923
1932
.
18.
Pichora-Fuller
,
M. K.
,
Schneider
,
B. A.
, and
Daneman
,
M.
(
1995
). “
How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
593
608
.
19.
Q-Mass Speech Audiometry (1992), Vol. 3, Qualitone, 4931 W. 35th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55416.
20.
Revised Speech-in-Noise (SPIN) Test (1987), Cosmos Distributing, Inc., Winnepeg, Manitoba, Canada.
21.
Schneider
,
B. A.
,
Pichora-Fuller
,
M. K.
,
Kowalchuk
,
D.
, and
Lamb
,
M.
(
1994
). “
Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
980
991
.
22.
Snell
,
K. B.
(
1997
). “
Age-related changes in temporal gap detection
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
2214
2220
.
23.
Snell
,
K. B.
,
Ison
,
J. R.
, and
Frisina
,
D. R.
(
1994
). “
The effects of signal frequency and absolute bandwidth on gap detection in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
1458
1464
.
24.
Strouse
,
A.
,
Ashmead
,
D. H.
,
Ohde
,
R. N.
, and
Grantham
,
D. W.
(
1998
). “
Temporal processing in the aging auditory system
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
2385
2399
.
25.
Stuart
,
A.
, and
Phillips
,
D. P.
(
1996
). “
Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners
,”
Ear Hear.
17
,
478
489
.
26.
SYSTAT for Windows: Statistics, Version 7.0, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, 1997.
27.
Tyler
,
R. S.
,
Summerfield
,
Q.
,
Wood
,
E. J.
, and
Fernandes
,
M. A.
(
1982
). “
Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
,
740
752
.
28.
van Rooij
,
J. C. G. M.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1990
). “
Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
2611
2624
.
29.
van Rooij
,
J. C. G. M.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1992
). “
Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
1028
1033
.
30.
Walton
,
J. P.
,
Frisina
,
R. D.
,
Ison
,
J. E.
, and
O’Neill
,
W. E.
(
1997
). “
Neural correlates of behavioral gap detection in the inferior colliculus of the young CBA mouse
,”
J. Comp. Physiol. A
181
,
161
176
.
31.
Willott
,
James, F.
(
1996
). “
Anatomic and physiologic aging: A behavioral neuroscience perspective
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
7
,
141
151
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.