Ambient noise can be used to produce images of submerged objects using the mean intensity of the backscattered energy, a technique coined “acoustic daylight” because of its direct analogy to vision. It is suggested that there may be substantial additional information in higher moments of the data. At high frequencies (>10 kHz), absorption suppresses long-range propagation so that a received signal is largely dependent on the local geometry, source characteristics, and the scattering properties of interceding objects. It is shown that for snapping shrimp (Cragnon, Alpheus, and Synalpheus) illumination (the primary sources in warm shallow water above a few kHz), significant information is embodied in the second temporal moments of intensity. There is no visual analog to this concept, which suggests a broader imaging approach which may be termed ambient noise imaging (ANI). Another ANI technique explored is the use of spatial cross correlation, which works well and also has no visual analogy. A model-based processor (Kalman filter) is also applied to track targets subject to highly variable illumination such as provided by snapping shrimp. Examples are presented using data provided by Scripps Institution of Oceanography from the initial deployment of the Acoustic Daylight Ocean Noise Imaging System (ADONIS) in San Diego.

1.
S. Flatté and W. Munk, “Submarine detection: Acoustic contrast versus Acoustic glow,” JASON Report JSR-85-108 (MITRE, McLean, VA, 1985).
2.
M. J.
Buckingham
,
B. V.
Berkhout
, and
S. A. L.
Glegg
, “
Imaging the ocean with ambient noise
,”
Nature (London)
356
,
327
329
(
1992
).
3.
M. J.
Buckingham
,
J. R.
Potter
, and
C. L.
Epifanio
, “
Seeing in the ocean with background noise
,”
Sci. Am.
274
(
2
),
86
90
(
1996
).
4.
D. H. Cato and M. J. Bell, “Ultrasonic ambient noise in Australian shallow waters at frequencies up to 200 kHz,” Materials Research Laboratory, DSTO, Australia Report MRL-TR-91-23 (1992).
5.
M. L.
Readhead
, “
Snapping shrimp noise near Gladstone, Queensland
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
1718
1722
(
1997
).
6.
M. J. Buckingham and J. R. Potter, “Observations, theory and simulation of anisotropy in oceanic ambient noise fields and its relevance to Acoustic Daylight imaging,” in Sea Surface Sound ’94, Lake Arrowhead, CA (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994), pp. 65–73.
7.
F. A. Everest, R. W. Young, and M. W. Johnson, “Acoustical characteristics of noise produced by snapping shrimp,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 20, (1948).
8.
J. R. Potter, T. W. Lim, and M. Chitre, “Ambient noise in shallow warm waters and implications for imaging,” in Sea Surface Sound ’97, Chilworth Manor, University of Southampton, UK (1997), pp. 45–54.
9.
B. J. Uscinski, The Elements of Wave Propagation in Random Media (McGraw–Hill, London, 1977), p. 62.
10.
J. R. Potter and M. Chitre, “ADONIS imaging with a Kalman filter and higher-order statistics,” in Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Underwater Acoustics (Heraklion, Greece, 1996), pp. 349–354.
11.
J. R.
Potter
, “
Acoustic imaging using ambient noise: Some theory and simulation results
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
21
33
(
1994
).
12.
J. S. Bendat and A. G. Piersol, Random Data, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1986), Chap. 8.
13.
C. L.
Epifanio
,
J. R.
Potter
,
G. B.
Deane
,
M.
Readhead
, and
M. J.
Buckingham
, “
Imaging in the ocean with ambient noise: the ORB experiments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
3211
3225
(
1999
).
14.
M. S. Grewal and A. P. Andrews, in Kalman Filtering: Theory and Practice (Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993), Chap. 4, Sec. 4.2.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.