Variations in the loop response of hearing aids caused by jaw movements, variations in acoustics outside the ear, and variations of vent size have been identified. Behind The Ear (BTE) and In The Ear Canal (ITEC) hearing aids were considered. The largest variations among the variations of the acoustics outside the ear, except when the hearing aid was partly removed, were found with the ITEC when a telephone set was placed by the ear. The variations of the loop response caused by changes in vent size were compared with the variations of a theoretical model of the feedback path. The theoretical model was also used to compare the feedback of different designs of the vent that gives the same acoustic impedance at low frequencies. The calculated feedback was less with the short vents (12 mm) than the long vents (24 mm).
REFERENCES
1.
Alvord
, L. S.
, and Farmer
, B. L.
(1997
). “Anatomy and orientation of the human external ear
,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol
8
, 383
–390
. 2.
Best, L. C. (1985). “Digital suppression of acoustic feedback in hearing aids” (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Wyoming).
3.
Bisgaard
, N.
, and Dyrlund
, O.
(1991
). “Acoustic feedback. Part 2: A digital system for feedback suppression of feedback
,” Hear. Instr.
42
, 44
–45
. 4.
Bustamante, D. K., Worrall, T. L., and Williamson, M. J. (1989). “Measurement and adaptive suppression of acoustic feedback in hearing aids,” Proceedings from International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. 2017–2020.
5.
Dyrlund
, O.
(1989
). “Acoustical feedback associated with the use of post aural hearing aids for profoundly deaf children
,” Scand. Audiol.
18
, 237
–241
. 6.
Dyrlund
, O.
, and Lundh
, P.
(1990
). “Gain and feedback problems when fitting behind-the-ear hearing aids to profoundly hearing-impaired children
,” Scand. Audiol.
19
, 89
–95
. 7.
Egolf
, D. P.
(1977
). “Mathematical model of a probe tube microphone
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
, 200
–205
. 8.
Egolf
, D. P.
, Howell
, H. C.
, Weawer
, K. A.
, and Barker
, D. S.
(1985
). “The hearing aid feedback path: Mathematical simulations and experimental verification
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
78
, 1578
–1587
. 9.
Engebretson
, A. M.
, and French-St. George
, M.
(1993
). “Properties of an adaptive feedback equalization algorithm
,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.
30
, 8
–16
. 10.
Erickson
, F. N.
, and van Tasell
, D. J.
(1991
). “Maximum real-ear gain of in-the-ear hearing aids
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
34
, 351
–359
. 11.
Gatehouse
, S.
(1989
). “Limitations on insertion gains with vented earmolds imposed by oscillatory feedback
,” Br. J. Audiol.
23
, 133
–136
. 12.
Grover
, B. C.
(1976
). “Acoustic modifications to earmolds
,” Br. J. Audiol.
10
, 8
–12
. 13.
Grover
, B. C.
, and Martin
, M. C.
(1974
). “On the practical gain limit for post-aural hearing aids
,” Br. J. Audiol.
8
, 121
–124
. 14.
Hansen, M. O/. (1997). “Occlusion effects, Part I, Hearing aid users experiences of the occlusion effect compared to the real ear sound level,” Report No. 71 (Dept. of Technical Audiology, Technical University of Denmark).
15.
Hellgren
, J.
, Lunner
, T.
, and Arlinger
, S.
(1999
). “System identification of feedback in hearing aids
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
, 2999
–3587
. 16.
Iberall
, A. S.
(1950
). “Attenuation of oscillary pressures in instrument lines
,” J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand.
45
, 85
–108
. 17.
IEC (1981). IEC 711, “Occluded ear simulator for the measurement of earphones coupled to the ear by ear inserts” (International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva).
18.
Johansen, P. A. (1975). “An evaluation of the acoustic feedback damping for behind the ear hearing aids,” Report No. 75.1 (Odense, Denmark, Research Laboratory for Technical Audiology, University Hospital).
19.
Joson
, H. A. L.
, Asano
, F.
, Suzuki
, Y.
, and Sone
, T.
(1993
). “Adaptive feedback cancellation with frequency compression for hearing aids
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
, 3248
–3254
. 20.
Kates
, J. M.
(1988
). “A computer simulation of hearing aid response and the effects of ear canal size
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
, 1952
–1963
. 21.
Kates
, J. M.
(1991
). “Feedback cancellation in hearing aids: Results from a computer simulation
,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process.
39
, 553
–561
. 22.
Kuk
, F. K.
(1994
). “Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs
,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
5
, 44
–51
. 23.
Kuo
, S. M.
, and Voepel
, S.
(1992
). “Integrated frequency-domain digital hearing aid with the lapped transform
,” Electron. Lett.
28
, 2117
–2118
. 24.
Ljung, L., and Glad, T. (1994). Modeling of Dynamic Systems (Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
25.
Lundh, P. (1982). “Acoustical feedback problems associated with hearing aids,” Otilcon internal report No. 19-8-6, Oticon A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
26.
Lybarger
, S. F.
(1975
). “Sound leakage from vented earmolds
,” Scand. Audiol. Suppl.
5
, 260
–270
. 27.
MacKenzie
, K.
, Browning
, G. G.
, and McClymont
, L. G.
(1989
). “Relationship between earmold venting, comfort and feedback
,” Br. J. Audiol.
23
, 335
–337
. 28.
Oliviera
, R. J.
(1997
). “The active earcanal
,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
8
, 401
–410
. 29.
Pirzanski
, C. Z.
(1998
). “Diminishing the occlusion effect: Clinician/manufacturer-related factors
,” Hear. J.
51
, 66
–78
.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1999 Acoustical Society of America.
1999
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.