Two experiments investigated the role of the regularity of the frequency spacing of harmonics, as a separate factor from harmonicity, on the perception of the virtual pitch of a harmonic series. The first experiment compared the shifts produced by mistuning the 3rd, 4th, and 5th harmonics in the pitch of two harmonic series: the odd-H and the all-H tones. The odd-H tone contained odd harmonics 1 to 11, plus the 4th harmonic; the all-H tone contained harmonics 1 to 12. Both tones had a fundamental frequency of 155 Hz. Pitch shifts produced by mistuning the 3rd harmonic, but not the 4th and 5th harmonics, were found to be significantly larger for the odd-H tone than for the all-H tone. This finding was consistent with the idea that grouping by spectral regularity affects pitch perception since an odd harmonic made a larger contribution than an adjacent even harmonic to the pitch of the odd-H tone. However, an alternative explanation was that the 3rd mistuned harmonic produced larger pitch shifts within the odd-H tone than the 4th mistuned harmonic because of differences in the partial masking of these harmonics by adjacent harmonics. The second experiment tested these explanations by measuring pitch shifts for a modified all-H tone in which each mistuned odd harmonic was tested in the presence of the 4th harmonic, but in the absence of its other even-numbered neighbor. The results showed that, for all mistuned harmonics, pitch shifts for the modified all-H tone were not significantly different from those for the odd-H tone. These findings suggest that the harmonic relations among frequency components, rather than the regularity of their frequency spacing, is the primary factor for the perception of the virtual pitch of complex sounds.

1.
Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organisation of Sound (MIT, Cambridge, MA).
2.
Ciocca
,
V.
, and
Darwin
,
C. J.
(
1993
). “
Effects of onset asynchrony on pitch perception: Adaptation or grouping?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2870
2878
.
3.
Darwin
,
C. J.
, and
Ciocca
,
V.
(
1992
). “
Grouping in pitch perception: Effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
3381
3390
.
4.
Darwin
,
C. J.
,
Ciocca
,
V.
, and
Sandell
,
G. J.
(
1994
). “
Effects of frequency and amplitude modulation on the pitch of a complex tone with a mistuned harmonic
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
2631
2636
.
5.
Darwin
,
C. J.
,
Hukin
,
R. W.
, and
Al-Khatib
,
B. Y.
(
1995
). “
Grouping in pitch perception: Evidence for sequential constraints
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
880
885
.
6.
Duifhuis
,
H.
,
Willems
,
L. F.
, and
Sluyter
,
R. J.
(
1982
). “
Measurement of pitch in speech: an implementation of Goldstein’s theory of pitch perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
71
,
1568
1580
.
7.
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1990
). “
Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data
,”
Hear. Res.
47
,
103
138
.
8.
Goldstein
,
J. L.
(
1973
). “
An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
54
,
1496
1516
.
9.
Hartmann
,
W. M.
,
McAdams
,
S.
, and
Smith
,
B. K.
(
1990
). “
Hearing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex tone
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
1712
1724
.
10.
Moore, B. C. J. (1987). “The perception of inharmonic complex tones,” Auditory Processing of Complex Sounds, edited by W. A. Yost and C. S. Watson (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 180–189.
11.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1990
). “
Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
2163
2177
.
12.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Peters
,
R. W.
(
1985
). “
Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
,
1853
1860
.
13.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Peters
,
R. W.
(
1986
). “
Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
479
483
.
14.
Roberts
,
B.
(
1998
). “
Effects of spectral pattern on the perceptual salience of partials in harmonic and frequency-shifted complex tones: A performance measure
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3588
3596
.
15.
Roberts
,
B.
, and
Bailey
,
P. J.
(
1993a
). “
Spectral pattern and the perceptual fusion of harmonics: I. The role of temporal factors
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
,
3153
3164
.
16.
Roberts
,
B.
, and
Bailey
,
P. J.
(
1993b
). “
Spectral pattern and the perceptual fusion of harmonics: II. A special status for added components?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
,
3165
3177
.
17.
Roberts
,
B.
, and
Bailey
,
P. J.
(
1996
). “
Spectral regularity as a factor distinct from harmonic relations in auditory grouping
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.
22
(
3
),
604
614
.
18.
Roberts
,
B.
, and
Bregman
,
A. S.
(
1991
). “
Effects of the pattern of spectral spacing on the perceptual fusion of harmonics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
3050
3060
.
19.
Roberts
,
B.
, and
Brunstrom
,
J. M.
(
1998
). “
Perceptual segregation and pitch shifts of mistuned components in harmonic complexes and in regular inharmonic complexes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
2326
2338
.
20.
Russell
,
P.
, and
Darwin
,
C. J.
(
1991
). “
Real-time synthesis of complex sounds on a Mac II with 56001 DSP chip
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
25
,
59
60
.
21.
Singh
,
P. G.
, and
Hirsh
,
I. J.
(
1992
). “
Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
2650
2661
.
22.
Terhardt
,
E.
(
1974
). “
Pitch, consonance, and harmony
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
55
,
1061
1069
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.