Tamil is unusual among the world’s languages in that some of its dialects have five contrasting liquids. This paper focuses on the characterization of these sounds in terms of articulatory geometry and kinematics, as well as their articulatory-acoustic relations. This study illustrates the use of multiple techniques—static palatography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and magnetometry (EMMA)—for investigating both static and dynamic articulatory characteristics using a single native speaker of Tamil. Dialectal merger and neutralization phenomena exhibited by the liquids of Tamil are discussed. Comparisons of English /ɹ/ and /l/ with Tamil provide evidence for generality in underlying mechanisms of rhotic and lateral production. The articulatory data justify the postulation of a class of rhotics and a class of laterals in Tamil, but do not provide evidence in favor of a larger class of liquids. Such a superclass appears to have largely an acoustic basis.
REFERENCES
1.
Alwan
, A.
, Narayanan
, S.
, and Haker
, K.
(1997
). “Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part II. The rhotics
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 1078
–1089
. 2.
Balasubramanian, T. (1972). “The phonetics of colloquial Tamil,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
3.
Boyce
, S.
, and Espy-Wilson
, C.
(1997
). “Coarticulatory stability in American English /r/
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 3741
–3753
. 4.
Byrd
, D.
, and Saltzman
, E.
(1998
). “Intragestural dynamics of multiple phrasal boundaries
,” J. Phonetics
26
, 173
–199
. 5.
Christdas, P. (1988). “The phonology and morphology of Tamil,” Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
6.
Delattre
, P.
, and Freeman
, D. C.
(1968
). “A dialect study of American r’s by x-ray motion picture
,” Linguistics, An international review
44
, 29
–68
. 7.
Espy-Wilson
, C.
(1992
). “Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semivowels in American English
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
, 736
–757
. 8.
Espy-Wilson, C., Narayanan, S., Boyce, S., and Alwan, A. (1997). “Acoustic modelling of American English /r/,” Proceedings of Eurospeech 97, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 393–396.
9.
Fant, G. (1968). “Analysis and synthesis of speech processes,” in Manual of Phonetics, edited by B. Malmberg (North-Holland, Amsterdam), pp. 171–272.
10.
Flanagan, J. (1972). Speech Analysis, Synthesis and Perception (Springer-Verlag, New York).
11.
Giles
, S. B.
, and Moll
, K. L.
(1975
). “Cineflurographic study of selected allophones of English [l]
,” Phonetica
31
, 206
–227
. 12.
Gracco
, V. L.
, and Nye
, P. W.
(1993
). “Magnetometry in speech articulation research: Some misadventures on the road to enlightenment
,” Forschungsberichte des Institut für Phonetic und Sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München (FIPKM)
31
, 91
–104
. 13.
Guenther
, F. H.
, Espy-Wilson
, C.
, Boyce
, S.
, Matthies
, M.
, Zandipour
, M.
, and Perkell
, J.
(1999
). “Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
, 2854
–2865
. 14.
Kelso
, J. A. S.
, Vatikiotis-Bateson
, E.
, Saltzman
, E. L.
, and Kay
, B.
(1985
). “A qualitative dynamic analysis of reiterant speech production: Phase portraits, kinematics, and dynamic modeling
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
, 266
–280
. 15.
Ladefoged
, P.
(1957
). “Use of palatography.
” Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
22
, 764
–774
. 16.
Ladefoged, P. (1982). A Course in Phonetics (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York).
17.
Ladefoged, P., and Maddieson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World’s Languages (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA).
18.
Lindau, M. (1985). “The story of r,” in Phonetic Linguistics, edited by V. Fromkin (Academic, Orlando, FL), pp. 157–168.
19.
Löfqvist, A. (1993). “Electromagnetic transduction techniques in the study of speech motor control,” Reports from the Department of Phonetics, University Umeå, PHONUM 2, 87–106.
20.
Löfqvist
, A.
, Gracco
, V.
, and Nye
, P.
(1993
). “Recording speech movements using magnetometry: One laboratory’s experience
,” Forschungsberichte des Institut für Phonetic und Sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München (FIPKM
), 31
, 143
–162
. 21.
Narayanan
, S.
, Alwan
, A.
, and Haker
, K.
(1995
). “An articulatory study of fricative consonants using magnetic resonance imaging
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
, 1325
–1347
. 22.
Narayanan
, S.
, Alwan
, A.
, and Haker
, K.
(1997
). “Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part I. The laterals
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 1064
–1077
. 23.
Narayanan, S., and Alwan, A. (1996). “Parametric hybrid source models for voiced and voiceless fricative consonants,” Proceedings of ICASSP 96, pp. 337–340.
24.
Narayanan, S., Kaun, A., Byrd, D., Ladefoged, P., and Alwan, A. (1996). “Liquids in Tamil,” edited by H. T. Bunnell and W. Idsardi, Proceedings of ICSLP 96, pp. 797–800.
25.
Narayanan, S., and Kaun, A. (1999). “Acoustic modeling of retroflex Tamil liquids,” Proceedings of XIV ICPhS, San Francisco, CA (in press).
26.
Ostry
, D. J.
, and Munhall
, K.
(1985
). “Control of rate and duration of speech movements
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
, 640
–648
. 27.
Perkell
, J.
, Cohen
, M.
, Svirsky
, M.
, Matthies
, M.
, Garabieta
, I.
, and Jackson
, M.
(1992
). “Electro-magnetic midsagittal articulometer (EMMA) systems for transducing speech articulatory movements
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
, 3078
–3096
. 28.
Ramasubramanian
, N.
, and Thosar
, R.
(1971
). “Synthesis by rule of some retroflex speech sounds
,” Language and Speech
14
, 65
–85
. 29.
Rubin, P. E. (1995). “HADES: A case study of the development of a signal analysis system,” in Applied Speech Technology (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), pp. 501–520.
30.
Saltzman, E., Löfqvist, A., and Mitra, S. (in press). “ ‘Clocks’ and ‘glue’—Global timing and intergestural cohesion,” Papers in Laboratory Phonology V.
31.
Scheffé
, H.
(1953
). “A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance
,” Biometrika
40
, 87
–104
. 32.
Sproat
, R.
, and Fujimura
, O.
(1993
). “Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation.
” J. Phonetics
21
, 291
–311
. 33.
Stevens, K. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
34.
Stone, M., Faber, A., Cordaro, M. (1991). “Cross-sectional tongue movement and tongue-palate movement in [s] and [∫] syllables,” Proceedings of the XII ICPhS, pp. 354–357.
35.
Stone
, M.
, Faber
, A.
, Raphael
, L.
, and Shawker
, T.
(1992
). “Cross-sectional tongue shapes and linguopalatal contact patterns in [s], [S] and [l] syllables.
” J. Phonetics
20
, 253
–270
. 36.
Westbury
, J. R.
, Hashi
, M.
, and Lindstrom
, M. J.
(1998
). “Differences among speakers in lingual articulations for American English /“trnr”/
,” Speech Commun.
26
, 203
–226
.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1999 Acoustical Society of America.
1999
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
