Speech intelligibility in rooms is influenced by room acoustics effects and by the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the speech and ambient noise. Several measures such as useful-to-detrimental sound ratios and the speech transmission index predict the combined effects of both types of factors. These measures were evaluated relative to speech intelligibility test results obtained in simulated sound fields. The use of simulated sound fields made it possible to create the full range of combinations of room acoustics and S/N effects likely to be found in rooms for speech. The S/N aspect is shown to be much more important than room acoustics effects and new broadband useful-to-detrimental ratios were validated. Useful-to-detrimental ratios, speech transmission index measures, and values of the articulation loss for consonants were all reasonably accurate predictors of speech intelligibility. Further improvements to these combined measures are suggested.

Topics
Speech communication, Room acoustics, Acoustic noise, Speech intelligibility, Speech processing systems, Consonants, Signal processing
1.
ANSI (1969). ANSI Standard S3.5-1969, “Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation Index” (American National Standards Institute, New York, 1969).
2.
H.
Haas
, “
The influence of a single reflection on the audibility of speech
,”
J. Aud. Eng. Soc.
20
,
145
–
159
(
1972
).
Google Scholar
 
3.
R.
Thiele
, “
Richtungsverteilung und Zeitfolge der Schallruckwurfe in Raumen
,”
Acustica
3
,
291
–
302
(
1953
).
Google Scholar
 
4.
L. Cremer and H. A. Müller, Principles and Applications of Room Acoustics, Section III.2.2, Vol. 1 (Applied Science Publishers, London, 1982).
5.
J. S.
Bradley
,
R.
Reich
, and
S. G.
Norcross
, “
A just noticeable difference in C50 for speech
,”
Appl. Acoust.
58
,
99
–
108
(
1999
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
J. P. A.
Lochner
and
J. F.
Burger
, “
The influence of reflections on auditorium acoustics
,”
J. Sound Vib.
1
,
426
–
454
(
1964
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
H. G.
Latham
, “
The signal-to-noise ratio for speech intelligibility—An auditorium acoustics design index
,”
Appl. Acoust.
12
,
253
–
320
(
1979
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
837
–
845
(
1986
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
9.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
846
–
854
(
1986
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
10.
V. M. A.
Peutz
, “
Articulation loss of consonants as a criterion for speech transmission in room
,”
J. Aud. Eng. Soc.
19
,
915
–
919
(
1971
).
Google Scholar
 
11.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Relationships among measures of speech intelligibility in rooms
,”
J. Aud. Eng. Soc.
46
,
396
–
405
(
1998
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
T.
Houtgast
and
J. M.
Steeneken
, “
The modulation transfer function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility
,”
Acustica
28
,
66
–
73
(
1973
).
Google Scholar
 
13.
T.
Houtgast
and
J. M.
Steeneken
, “
A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
,
1069
–
1077
(
1985
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
14.
R.
Reich
and
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Optimizing classroom acoustics using computer model studies
,”
Can. Acoust.
26
,
15
–
21
(
1998
).
Google Scholar
 
15.
T.
Houtgast
, “
The effect of ambient noise on speech intelligibility in classrooms
,”
Appl. Acoust.
14
,
15
–
25
(
1981
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
16.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Optimising the decay range in room acoustics measurements using maximum-length-sequence techniques
,”
J. Aud. Eng. Soc.
44
,
266
–
273
(
1996
).
Google Scholar
 
17.
J. S. Bradley, “An international comparison of room acoustics measurements systems,” IRC Internal Report No. 714 (January 1996).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1999 Acoustical Society of America.
1999
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.