Buchta and Vos [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2890–2902 (1998)] have recently analyzed one set of blast-sound attitudinal survey data. From this survey, they conclude that annoyance increases less rapidly with level for high-energy impulsive sounds than it does for conventional sounds like road traffic noise, a result that is at odds with a significant number of research results. This paper discusses the analysis by Buchta and Vos and points to several areas in their analysis that might cause their results to depart from the results found by others. Specifically, it appears that the communities in their study exhibit abnormally high levels of annoyance to noise. Also, the great majority of the data that they analyze are below the threshold at which people in the community will notice these sounds. These factors may account for the results found.
REFERENCES
1.
ANSI (1995). American National Standard Criteria for Evaluating Room Noise—ANSI S12.2, American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Table 4.
2.
ANSI (1997). American National Standard Quantities and Procedure for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound, Part 4: Noise Assessment and Long-term Community Response—ANSI S12.9 Part 4, American National Standards Institute (ANSI).
3.
Borsky, P. N. (1965). “Community Reactions to Sonic Booms in the Oklahoma City Area,” National Opinion Research Center, AMRL-TR-65-37.
4.
Broadbent
, E. E.
, and Robinson
, D. W.
(1964
). “Subjective measures of the relative annoyance of simulated sonic bangs and aircraft noise
,” J. Sound Vib.
1
, 162
–174
. 5.
Buchta
, E.
, and Vos
, J.
(1998
). “A field survey on the annoyance caused by sounds from large firearms and road traffic
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
, 2890
–2902
. 6.
Bullen, R. B., and Hede, A. J. (1984). “Community Response to Impulsive Noise: A Survey Around Holsworthy Army Range,” Socio-Acoustic Research Section, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
7.
CHABA (1981). Community Response to High-Energy Impulsive Sounds, National Research Council, Committee on Hearing Bio-acoustics and Bio-mechanics (CHABA), edited by W. Galloway (National Academy, Washington, DC).
8.
CHABA (1996). Community Response to High-Energy Impulsive Sounds: An Assessment of the Field Since 1981, National Research Council, Committee on Hearing Bio-acoustics and Bio-mechanics (CHABA), edited by S. Fidell (National Academy, Washington, DC).
9.
Cook, R., and Job, D. R. S. (1994). “A Criterion for Community Response to Impulse Noise from Large Calibre Weapons and Explosions,” National Acoustic Laboratories, Commissioned Report No. 79, Chatswood NSW, Australia.
10.
EPA (1974). “Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety,” US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control, Washington, DC.
11.
Fidell
, S.
, Shultz
, T. J.
, and Green
, D. M.
(1988
). “A theoretical interpretation of the prevalence rate of noise-induced annoyance in residential populations
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
, 2109
–2113
. 12.
Finegold
, L. S.
, Harris
, C. S.
, and von Gierke
, H. E.
(1994
). “Community annoyance and sleep disturbance: Updated criteria for assessment of the impacts of general transportation noise on people
,” Noise Control Eng. J.
42
(1
), 25
–30
. 13.
Kryter, K. D., Johnson, P. J., and Young, J. R. (1967). “Sonic Boom Experiments at Edwards Air Force Base, Annex B: Psychological Experiments on Sonic Booms,” National Sonic Boom Evaluation Office, USAF Contract AF 49(638)-1758, Stanford Research Institute.
14.
Leatherwood
, J. D.
, and Sullivan
, B. M.
(1994
). “Laboratory study of effects of sonic boom shaping on judged loudness and acceptability
,” Noise Control Eng. J.
42
, 59
–69
. 15.
Miedema
, H. M. E.
, and Vos
, H.
(1998
). “Exposure-response relationship for transportation noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
, 3432
–3445
. 16.
Schomer
, P. D.
, Goff
, R. J.
, and Little
, L. M.
(1978
). “Statistics of amplitude and spectrum of blasts propagated in the atmosphere
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
, 1431
–1442
. 17.
Schomer
, P. D.
(1994
). “New descriptor for high-energy impulsive sounds
,” Noise Control Eng. J.
42
(5
), 179
–191
. 18.
Schomer
, P. D.
, Sias
, J. W.
, and Maglieri
, D.
(1997
). “A comparative study of human response, indoors, to blast noise and sonic booms
,” Noise Control Eng. J.
45
(4
), 169
–182
. 19.
Schultz
, T. J.
(1978
). “Synthesis of social survey on noise annoyance
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
, 377
–405
. 20.
Siskind, D. E. et al. (1980). “Structure Response and Damage Produced by Airblast for Surface Mining,” US Bureau of Mine Report of Investigations, RI 8485, US Department of the Interior.
21.
Sneddon, M., Howe, R., Pearsons, K., and Fidell, S. (1996). “Laboratory Study of the Noticeability and Annoyance on Sounds of Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio,” NASA Contractor Report 201613, Contract NAS1-20101, Fig. 11.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1999 Acoustical Society of America.
1999
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
