Although researchers have long recognized the unique properties of the head-related transfer function (HRTF) for nearby sources (within 1 m of the listener’s head), virtually all of the HRTF measurements described in the literature have focused on source locations 1 m or farther from the listener. In this study, HRTFs for sources at distances from 0.12 to 1 m were calculated using a rigid-sphere model of the head and measured using a Knowles Electronic Manikin for Acoustic Research (KEMAR) and an acoustic point source. Both the calculations and the measurements indicate that the interaural level difference (ILD) increases substantially for lateral sources as distance decreases below 1 m, even at low frequencies where the ILD is small for distant sources. In contrast, the interaural time delay (ITD) is roughly independent of distance even when the source is close. The KEMAR measurements indicate that the direction of the source relative to the outer ear plays an important role in determining the high-frequency response of the HRTF in the horizontal plane. However, the elevation-dependent characteristics of the HRTFs are not strongly dependent on distance, and the contribution of the pinna to the HRTF is independent of distance beyond a few centimeters from the ear. Overall, the results suggest that binaural cues play an important role in auditory distance perception for nearby sources.

1.
Begault, D. R. (1987). “Control of Auditory Distance,” Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego.
2.
Brungart, D. (1998). “Near-Field Auditory Localization.” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
3.
Brungart, D., and Rabinowitz, W. (1996). “Auditory localization in the near-field,” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Auditory Display, Santa Fe Institute.
4.
Brungart
,
D. S.
,
Rabinowitz
,
W. M.
, and
Durlach
,
N.
(
1996
). “
Auditory localization of a nearby point source
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
2593
.
5.
Carlile
,
S.
, and
Pralong
,
D.
(
1994
). “
The location dependent nature of perceptually salient features of the head-related transfer function
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
3445
3459
.
6.
Duda
,
R.
, and
Martens
,
W.
(
1998
). “
Range dependence of the response of a spherical head model
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
3048
3058
.
7.
Firestone
,
F.
(
1930
). “
The phase difference and amplitude ratio at the ears due to a source of pure tone
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
2
,
260
270
.
8.
Gardner
,
W.
, and
Martin
,
K.
(
1995
). “
HRTF measurements of a KEMAR
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
3907
3908
.
9.
Greene
,
D.
(
1968
). “
Comments on ‘Perception of the range of a sound source of unknown strength
,’ ”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
44
,
634
.
10.
Hartley
,
R.
, and
Fry
,
T.
(
1921
). “
The binaural location of pure tones
,”
Phys. Rev.
18
,
431
442
.
11.
Hershkowitz
,
R.
, and
Durlach
,
N.
(
1969
). “
Interaural time and amplitude JNDs for a 500-Hz tone
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
46
,
1464
1467
.
12.
Hirsch
,
H.
(
1968
). “
Perception of the range of a sound source of unknown strength
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
43
,
373
374
.
13.
Kuhn
,
G.
(
1977
). “
Model for the interaural time differences in the azimuthal plane
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
62
,
157
167
.
14.
McKinley
,
R.
,
Ericson
,
M.
, and
D’Angelo
,
W.
(
1994
). “
Three dimensional audio displays: development, applications, and performance
,”
Aviat., Space Environ. Med.
65
,
A31
A38
.
15.
Mehrgardt
,
S.
, and
Mellert
,
V.
(
1977
). “
Transformation characteristics of the external human ear
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
1567
1576
.
16.
Middlebrooks
,
J.
,
Makous
,
J. C.
, and
Green
,
D. M.
(
1989
). “
Directional sensitivity of sound-pressure levels in the human ear canal
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
86
,
89
107
.
17.
Molino
,
J.
(
1970
). “
Perceiving the range of a sound source when the direction is known
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
53
,
1301
1304
.
18.
Møller
,
H.
,
Sørensen
,
M.
,
Hammershøi
,
D.
, and
Jensen
,
C. B.
(
1995
). “
Head-related transfer functions of human subjects
,”
J. Audio Engineering Society
,
43
,
300
320
.
19.
Pralong
,
D.
, and
Carlile
,
S.
(
1994
). “
Measuring the human head related transfer functions: A novel method for the construction and calibration of a miniature ‘in ear’ recording system
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
3435
3444
.
20.
Rabinowitz
,
W.
,
Maxwell
,
J.
,
Shao
,
Y.
, and
Wei
,
M.
(
1993
). “
Sound localization cues for a magnified head: implications from sound diffraction about a rigid sphere
,”
Presence
2
,
125
129
.
21.
Shaw
,
E.
(
1974
). “
Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
56
,
1848
1861
.
22.
Stewart
,
G.
(
1911a
). “
The acoustic shadow of a rigid sphere with certain applications in architectural acoustics and audition
,”
Phys. Rev.
33
,
467
479
.
23.
Stewart
,
G.
(
1911b
). “
Phase relations in the acoustic shadow of a rigid sphere; phase difference at the ears
,”
Phys. Rev.
34
,
252
258
.
24.
Suzuki, Y., Kim, H.-Y., Takane S., and Sone, T. (1998). “A modeling of distance perception based on auditory parallax model,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Acoustics and the 135th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America.
25.
von Bekesy, G. (1960). Experiments in Hearing (Wiley, New York).
26.
Wightman
,
F.
, and
Kistler
,
D.
(
1989
). “
Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
858
877
.
27.
Wightman
,
F.
, and
Kistler
,
D.
(
1992
). “
The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
1648
1660
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.