This study examined whether “modulation masking” could be produced by temporal similarity of the probe and masker envelopes, even when the masker envelope did not contain a spectral component close to the probe frequency. Both masker and probe amplitude modulation were applied to a single 4-kHz sinusoidal or narrow-band noise carrier with a level of 70 dB SPL. The threshold for detecting 5-Hz probe modulation was affected by the presence of a pair of masker modulators beating at a 5-Hz rate (40 and 45 Hz, 50 and 55 Hz, or 60 and 65 Hz). The threshold was dependent on the phase of the probe modulation relative to the beat cycle of the masker modulators; the threshold elevation was greatest (12–15 dB for the sinusoidal carrier and 9–11 dB for the noise carrier, expressed as when the peak amplitude of the probe modulation coincided with a peak in the beat cycle. The maximum threshold elevation of the 5-Hz probe produced by the beating masker modulators was 7–12 dB greater than that produced by the individual components of the masker modulators. The threshold elevation produced by the beating masker modulators was 2–10 dB greater for 5-Hz probe modulation than for 3- or 7-Hz probe modulation. These results cannot be explained in terms of the spectra of the envelopes of the stimuli, as the beating masker modulators did not produce a 5-Hz component in the spectra of the envelopes. The threshold for detecting 5-Hz probe modulation in the presence of 5-Hz masker modulation varied with the relative phase of the probe and masker modulation. The pattern of results was similar to that found with the beating two-component modulators, except that thresholds were highest when the masker and probe were 180° out of phase. The results are consistent with the idea that nonlinearities within the auditory system introduce distortion in the internal representation of the envelopes of the stimuli. In the case of two-component beating modulators, a weak component is introduced at the beat rate, and it has an amplitude minimum when the beat cycle is at its maximum. The results could be fitted well using two models, one based on the concept of a sliding temporal integrator and one based on the concept of a modulation filter bank.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 1999
August 01 1999
Modulation masking produced by beating modulators
Brian C. J. Moore;
Brian C. J. Moore
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England
Search for other works by this author on:
Aleksander Sek;
Aleksander Sek
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England
Search for other works by this author on:
Brian R. Glasberg
Brian R. Glasberg
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 908–918 (1999)
Article history
Received:
December 18 1998
Accepted:
April 30 1999
Citation
Brian C. J. Moore, Aleksander Sek, Brian R. Glasberg; Modulation masking produced by beating modulators. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 August 1999; 106 (2): 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427106
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers
J Acoust Soc Am (November 1997)
Perception of the envelope-beat frequency of inharmonic complex temporal envelopes
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 2005)
Modulation masking produced by complex tone modulators
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2003)
The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2000)
Investigating possible mechanisms behind the effect of threshold fine structure on amplitude modulation perception
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2009)