Target strengths (TS) of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) are difficult to measure in situ because this species lives at 800–1200 m, has low TS at 38 kHz, shows strong avoidance behavior, and sometimes co-occurs with species having much higher TS. Orange roughy have wax-invested swimbladders and fish are ∼20% wax esters by weight. Estimates of orange roughy near-dorsal aspect tilt-averaged target strength (〈TS〉) are controversial, varying from [−39, −35] dB to [−52, −48] dB for a 35-cm fish in different studies. 〈TS〉 is estimated using experiments on both live and dead fish, and new swimming orientation data. Target strength of previously frozen and thawed fish decline rapidly, stabilizing after ∼12 h as air and oil diffuse out of tissues during rehydration. A 〈TS〉 of −46.3 dB is predicted for a 35-cm live orange roughy (bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals=−48.0 to −45.5 dB). This value is 3.7 dB higher than Australian estimates of ≈−50 dB for 〈TS〉 of a 35-cm live orange roughy. It is shown that the magnitude of the difference between in situ estimates of 〈TS〉 and experimental measurements of 〈TS〉 on live fish can be explained by the effect of strong avoidance reactions to a towed transducer on the tilt angle of the fish. Previously much higher estimates of dead orange roughy 〈TS〉 were an artifact of air pockets caused by freezing. Comparison of orange roughy TSmax measured in our experiments with a large dataset for nonswimbladder and swimbladder fish shows that orange roughy have an unusually low target strength at 38 kHz.

1.
J. J.
Dawson
and
W. A.
Karp
, “
In situ measures of target-strength variability of individual fish
,”
Rapp. P.-V. Reun.-Cons. Int. Explor. Mer.
189
,
264
273
(
1990
).
2.
E.
Ona
, “
Physiological factors causing natural variations in acoustic target strength of fish
,”
J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K.
70
,
107
127
(
1990
).
3.
M. R.
Clark
and
D. M.
Tracey
, “
Changes in a population of orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus, with commercial exploitation on the Challenger Plateau, New Zealand
,”
Fish. Bull.
92
,
236
253
(
1993
).
4.
A. J.
Koslow
,
R.
Kloser
, and
C. A.
Stanley
, “
Avoidance of a camera system by a deepwater fish, the orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus)
,”
Deep-Sea Res.
42
,
233
244
(
1995
).
5.
J. R.
Sargent
,
R. R.
Gatten
, and
N. R.
Merrett
, “
Lipids of Hoplostethus atlanticus and H. mediterraneus (Beryciformes: Trachichthyidae) from deep water to the west of Britain
,”
Marine Biology
74
,
281
286
(
1983
).
6.
C. F.
Phleger
and
M. R.
Grigor
, “
Role of wax esters in determining buoyancy in Hoplostethus atlanticus (Beryciformes: Trachichthyidae)
,”
Marine Biology
105
,
229
233
(
1990
).
7.
M. R.
Grigor
,
W. H.
Sutherland
, and
C. F.
Phleger
, “
Wax-ester metabolism in the orange roughy Hoplostethus atlanticus (Beryciformes: Trachichthyidae)
,”
Marine Biology
105
,
223
227
(
1990
).
8.
R. J.
Kloser
,
A.
Williams
, and
J. A.
Koslow
, “
Problems with acoustic target strength measurements of a deepwater fish, orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus, Collett)
,”
ICES J. Mar. Sci.
54
,
60
71
(
1997
).
9.
M. R. Clarke and D. M. Tracey, “Orange roughy off the southeast coast of the South Island and Puysegur Bank: exploratory and research fishing, June–August 1992,” MAF Fisheries, Wellington, New Zealand Fisheries Technical Report 35 (1993).
10.
O. Anderson and J. Fenaughty, “Trawl surveys of orange roughy on the Chatham Rise, 1984 to 1992,” NIWA, Wellington, New Zealand Fisheries Data Report 81 (1996).
11.
M. A.
Do
and
R. F.
Coombs
, “
Acoustic measurements of the population of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) on the north Chatham Rise, New Zealand
,”
New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
,
23
,
225
237
(
1989
).
12.
N. G.
Elliott
and
R. J.
Kloser
, “
Use of acoustics to assess a small aggregation of orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus (Collett), off the eastern coast of Tasmania
,”
Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
,
44
,
473
482
(
1993
).
13.
R. J.
Kloser
,
J. A.
Koslow
, and
A.
Williams
, “
Acoustic assessment of the biomass of a spawning aggregation of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus, Collett) off South-eastern Australia, 1990–93
,”
Marine and Freshwater Research
,
47
,
1015
1024
(
1996
).
14.
R. J. Kloser, A. Williams, and J. A. Koslow, “The acoustic target strength of a deepwater fish, orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), based on modelling and in situ measurements on schools and tethered fish,” CSIRO Marine Laboratories, Final report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Grant number 90/25.
15.
R. W. G.
Haslett
, “
Automatic plotting of polar diagrams of target strength of fish in roll, pitch and yaw
,”
Rapp. P.-V. Reun.-Cons. Int. Explor. Mer
170
,
74
81
(
1977
).
16.
R. F. Coombs, “An adaptable acoustic data acquisition system for fish stock assessment,” In International Conference on Underwater Acoustics, 5–7 December 1994, Australian Acoustical Society, University of New South Wales, Sydney, pp. 18–22 (1994).
17.
C. S. Clay and H. Medwin, Acoustical Oceanography: Principles and Applications (Wiley, New York, 1977), p. 544.
18.
S.
McClatchie
,
J.
Alsop
, and
R. F.
Coombs
, “
A re-evaluation of relationships between fish size, acoustic frequency, and target strength
,”
ICES J. Mar. Sci.
53
,
780
791
(
1996
).
19.
K. G.
Foote
, “
Averaging of fish target strength functions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
,
504
515
(
1980
).
20.
K. G.
Foote
, “
Importance of the swimbladder in acoustic scattering by fish: A comparison of gadoid and mackerel target strengths
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
,
2084
2089
(
1980
).
21.
O.
Nakken
and
K.
Olsen
, “
Target strength measurements of fish
,”
Rapp. P.-V. Reun.-Cons. Int. Explor. Mer
170
,
52
69
(
1977
).
22.
D. N. MacLennan and E. J. Simmonds, Fisheries Acoustics (Chapman & Hall, London, 1992), p. 325.
23.
J. I. Edwards and F. Armstrong, “Target strength measurements on herring, sprat and mackerel,” ICES CM. 1983/B:23: 22 p. (mimeo) (1983).
24.
T.
Mukai
,
N.
Sano
,
K.
Iida
, and
S.
Sasaki
, “
Relation between dorsal aspect target strength of fish caught in the East China Sea and their swimbladder
,”
Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi
,
60
,
215
222
(
1994
).
25.
S. McClatchie and Z. Ye, “Target strength of the deep-water fish, orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus). Part II: Modeling” (unpublished).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.