The present study assesses the ability of four listeners with high-frequency, bilateral symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss to localize and detect a broadband click train in the frontal-horizontal plane, in quiet and in the presence of a white noise. The speaker array and stimuli are identical to those described by Lorenzi et al. (in press). The results show that: (1) localization performance is only slightly poorer in hearing-impaired listeners than in normal-hearing listeners when noise is at 0 deg azimuth, (2) localization performance begins to decrease at higher signal-to-noise ratios for hearing-impaired listeners than for normal-hearing listeners when noise is at ±90 deg azimuth, and (3) the performance of hearing-impaired listeners is less consistent when noise is at ±90 deg azimuth than at 0 deg azimuth. The effects of a high-frequency hearing loss were also studied by measuring the ability of normal-hearing listeners to localize the low-pass filtered version of the clicks. The data reproduce the effects of noise on three out of the four hearing-impaired listeners when noise is at 0 deg azimuth. They reproduce the effects of noise on only two out of the four hearing-impaired listeners when noise is at ±90 deg azimuth. The additional effects of a low-frequency hearing loss were investigated by attenuating the low-pass filtered clicks and the noise by 20 dB. The results show that attenuation does not strongly affect localization accuracy for normal-hearing listeners. Measurements of the clicks' detectability indicate that the hearing-impaired listeners who show the poorest localization accuracy also show the poorest ability to detect the clicks. The inaudibility of high frequencies, “distortions,” and reduced detectability of the signal are assumed to have caused the poorer-than-normal localization accuracy for hearing-impaired listeners.

1.
Abel
,
S. M.
, and
Hay
,
V. H.
(
1996
). “
Sound localization. The interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection
,”
Scand. Audiol.
25
,
3
12
.
2.
Butler
,
R. A.
, and
Naunton
,
R. F.
(
1964
). “
Role of stimulus frequency and duration in the phenomenon of localization shift
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
,
917
922
.
3.
Durlach
,
N. I.
,
Thompson
,
C. L.
, and
Colburn
,
H. S.
(
1981
). “
Binaural interaction in impaired listeners: A review of past research
,”
Audiol.
20
,
181
211
.
4.
Good
,
M.
, and
Gilkey
,
R. H.
(
1996
). “
Sound localization in noise: The effect of signal-to-noise ratio
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
,
1108
1117
.
5.
Hall
,
J. W.
,
Tyler
,
R. S.
, and
Fernandes
,
M. A.
(
1984
). “
Factors influencing the masking level difference in cochlear hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
27
,
145
154
.
6.
Hermann
,
G. E.
,
Warren
,
L. R.
, and
Wagener
,
J. W.
(
1977
). “
Auditory lateralization: age differences in sensitivity to dichotic time and amplitude cues
,”
J. Gerontol.
32
,
187
191
.
7.
Kistler
,
D. J.
, and
Wightman
,
F. L.
(
1992
). “
A model of head-related transfer functions based on principal components analysis and minimum-phase reconstruction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
1637
1647
.
8.
Lorenzi
,
C.
,
Gatehouse
,
S.
, and
Lever
,
C.
(
1999
). “
Localization in noise in normal-hearing listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
1810
1820
.
9.
Lorenzi
,
C.
,
Gatehouse
,
S.
, and
Lever
,
C.
(
1997
). “
Sound localization in noise in hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
3104
.
10.
Mills, A. W. (1972). “Auditory localization,” in Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, Vol. 2, edited by J. V. Tobias (Academic, New York), pp. 303–348.
11.
Noble
,
W.
, and
Byrne
,
D.
(
1990
). “
A comparison of different binaural aid systems for sound localization in the horizontal and vertical planes
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
24
,
335
346
.
12.
Noble
,
W.
,
Byrne
,
D.
, and
Lepage
,
B.
(
1994
). “
Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
992
1005
.
13.
Nordlund
,
B.
(
1964
). “
Directional audiometry
,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol.
57
,
1
18
.
14.
Plomp
,
R.
(
1978
). “
Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
,
533
549
.
15.
Pröschel
,
U. L. J.
, and
Döring
,
W. H.
(
1990
). “
Richtungshören in der horizontalebene bei störungen der auditiven selecktionsfähigkeit und bei seitengleicher innenhorschwerhörigkeit, Teil I, Teil II
,”
Audiol. Akustik.
3
,
98
107
;
Pröschel
,
U. L. J.
, and
Döring
,
W. H.
,
Audiol. Akustik.
(
1990
)
3
,
170
177
.
16.
Quaranta
,
A.
, and
Cervellera
,
G.
(
1974
). “
Masking level differences in normal and pathological ears
,”
Audiol.
13
,
428
431
.
17.
Rayleigh
,
Lord
(
1907
). “
On our perception of sound direction
,”
Philos. Mag.
13
,
214
232
.
18.
Röser
,
D.
(1966). “Directional hearing in persons with hearing disorders,” cited in Durlach, N. I., Thompson, C. L., and Colburn, H. S.
Röser
,
D.
, (
1981
).
Binaural interaction in impaired listeners
,”
Audiol.
20
,
181
211
.
19.
Staffel
,
J. G.
,
Hall
,
J. W.
,
Grose
,
J. H.
, and
Pillsbury
,
H. C.
(
1990
). “
NoSo and NoSπ detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
1720
1727
.
20.
Viehweg
,
R.
, and
Campbell
,
R.
(
1960
). “
Localization difficulty in monaurally impaired listeners
,”
Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.
69
,
622
634
.
21.
Wightman
,
F. L.
, and
Kistler
,
D.
(
1992
). “
The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
1648
1661
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.