Listeners were asked to discriminate between two amplitude-modulation functions imposed on white noise and consisting of the sum of two sinusoids. The frequency ratio of the sinusoids constituting each function was 2 or 3. In one function, the sinusoids had a constant relative phase. In the other function, their phase relation was continuously and cyclically changing, at a slow rate. For all listeners, the two functions with a frequency ratio of 2 were easily discriminated. However, discrimination was impossible when the frequency ratio was 3. Simulations were performed using an envelope-detector model and various decision statistics. The max/min statistic predicted discrimination above chance level when the frequency ratio was 3. It seems, therefore, that listeners are unable to use this statistic. In contrast, the crest factor and skewness of the envelope accounted well for the discrimination data.

1.
Bacon
,
S. P.
, and
Grantham
,
D. W.
(
1989
). “
Modulation masking patterns: Effects of modulation frequency, depth and phase
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
2575
2580
.
2.
Dau
,
T.
,
Kollmeier
,
B.
, and
Kohlrausch
,
A.
(
1997
). “
Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. II. Spectral and temporal integration
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
,
2906
2919
.
3.
Forrest
,
T. G.
, and
Green
,
D. M.
(
1987
). “
Detection of partially filled gaps in noise and the temporal modulation transfer function
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
1933
1943
.
4.
Hartmann
,
W. M.
, and
Pumplin
,
J.
(
1988
). “
Noise power fluctuations and the masking of sine signals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
2277
2289
.
5.
Strickland
,
E. A.
, and
Viemeister
,
N. F.
(
1996
). “
Cues for discrimination of envelopes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
,
3638
3646
.
6.
Viemeister
,
N. F.
(
1979
). “
Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
66
,
1364
1380
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.