Forward masking was investigated as a measure of spectral and temporal interactions. Such interactions may adversely affect speech recognition in cochlear-implant subjects. Seven subjects, implanted with the Nucleus 22 device, performed a forward-masking task. They also performed an electrode-discrimination task in order to measure spectral interactions without temporal interactions. Correlation analysis indicated a significant relationship between data obtained in the two tasks The two tasks were also correlated with the subjects’ scores from five measures of speech recognition. Forward masking and electrode discrimination were strongly correlated with measures requiring consonant and phoneme recognition, respectively. These results indicate that the relationship between forward masking and speech recognition may be due, in part, to a lack of spectral resolution. The data also indicate that consonants may be more readily masked than vowels. Forward-masking data measured for all clinically programmed electrodes in three of the seven subjects were used with a model of the spectral maxima sound processor (SMSP) to estimate the number of electrodes stimulated during a consonant that might be masked by prior presentation of a vowel. These results suggest that temporal interactions across electrodes may be a factor in speech-recognition abilities of some cochlear-implant subjects.
REFERENCES
1.
Black
, R. C.
, and Clark
, G. M.
(1980
). “Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerve
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
, 868
–874
. 2.
Blamey
, P. J.
, and Dooley
, G. J.
(1993
). “Pattern recognition and masking in cochlear implant patients
,” Prog. Brain Res.
97
, 271
–8
. 3.
Blamey
, P. J.
, Dowell
, R. C.
, Brown
, A. M.
, Clark
, G. M.
, and Seligman
, P. M.
(1987
). “Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
, 48
–57
. 4.
Boothroyd
, A.
, Mulhearn
, B.
, Gong
, J.
, and Ostroff
, J.
(1996
). “Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
, 1807
–1818
. 5.
Busby
, P. A.
, and Clark
, G. M.
(1996
). “Electrode discrimination by early-deafened cochlear implant patients
,” Audiology
35
(1
), 8
–22
. 6.
Busby
, P. A.
, and Clark
, G. M.
(1997
). “Pitch and loudness estimation for single and multiple pulse per period electric pulse rates by cochlear implant patients
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 1687
–95
. 7.
Busby
, P. A.
, Tong
, Y. C.
, and Clark
, G. M.
(1993
). “Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early- and late-deafened cochlear implant patients
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
, 1058
–67
. 8.
Busby
, P. A.
, Whitford
, L. A.
, Blamey
, P. J.
, Richardson
, L. M.
, and Clark
, G. M.
(1994
). “Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
, 2658
–69
. 9.
Chatterjee
, M.
, and Shannon
, R. V.
(1998
). “Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
, 2565
–72
. 10.
Collins
, L. M.
, Zwolan
, T. A.
, and Wakefield
, G. H.
(1997
). “Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 440
–55
. 11.
Davis, H., and Silverman, S. R. (1978). Hearing and Deafness (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York).
12.
Dorman
, M. F.
, and Raphael
, L. J.
(1980
). “Distribution of acoustic cues for stop consonant place of articulation in VCV syllables
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
, 1333
–1335
. 13.
Dorman
, M. F.
, Dankowski
, K.
, McCandless
, G.
, Parkin
, J. L.
, and Smith
, L.
(1991
). “Vowel and consonant recognition with the aid of a multichannel cochlear implant
,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A
43
(3
), 585
–601
. 14.
Dowell
, R. C.
, Martin
, L. F.
, Tong
, Y. C.
, Clark
, G. M.
, Seligman
, P. M.
, and Patrick
, J. F.
(1982
). “A 12-consonant confusion study on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
25
(4
), 509
–16
. 15.
Doyle
, K. J.
, Mills
, D.
, Larky
, J.
, Kessler
, D.
, Luxford
, W. M.
, and Schindler
, R. A.
(1995
). “Consonant perception by users of Nucleus and Clarion multichannel cochlear implants
,” American Journal of Otology
16
(5
), 676
–81
. 16.
Jesteadt
, W.
, Bacon
, S. P.
, and Lehman
, J. R.
(1982
). “Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level, and signal delay
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
71
, 950
–62
. 17.
Levitt
, H.
(1971
). “Transformed up–down methods in psychoacoustics
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
49
, 467
. 18.
Lim
, H. H.
, Tong
, Y. C.
, and Clark
, G. M.
(1989
). “Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
86
, 971
–80
. 19.
McDermott
, H. J.
, McKay
, C. M.
, and Vandali
, A. E.
(1992
). “A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
, 3367
–71
. 20.
McKay
, C. M.
, McDermott
, H. J.
, and Clark
, G. M.
(1996
). “The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
, 1079
–1090
. 21.
Merzenich, M. M., and White, M. W. (1977). “Cochlear implants: The interface problem,” in Functional Electrical Stimulation: Applications in Neural Prostheses, edited by F. T. Hambrecht and J. B. Reswick (Marcel Dekker, New York), Vol. 3, pp. 321–340.
22.
Pelizzone
, M.
, Boex
, C.
, and Montandon
, P.
(1993
). “Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients
,” ORL. J. Otorhinol. Relat. Spec.
55
(6
), 341
–6
. 23.
Shannon
, R. V.
(1983
). “Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics
,” Hearing Res.
11
(2
), 157
–89
. 24.
Shannon
, R. V.
(1983
). “Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction
,” Hearing Res.
12
(1
), 1
–16
. 25.
Shannon
, R. V.
(1990
). “Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
, 741
–4
. 26.
Shannon
, R. V.
, Zeng
, F. G.
, Kamath
, V.
, Wygonski
, J.
, and Ekelid
, M.
(1995
). “Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues
,” Science
270
, 303
–4
. 27.
Skinner
, M. W.
, Holden
, L. K.
, Holden
, T. A.
, Dowell
, R. C.
, Seligman
, P. M.
, Brimacombe
, J. A.
, and Beiter
, A. L.
(1991
). “Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant
,” Ear Hear.
12
(1
), 3
–22
. 28.
Streeter
, L. A.
, and Nigro
, G. N.
(1979
). “The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
65
, 1533
–1541
. 29.
Tartter
, V. C.
, Kat
, D.
, Samuel
, A. G.
, and Repp
, B. H.
(1983
). “Perception of intervocalic stop consonants: The contributions of closure duration and formant transitions
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
, 715
–725
. 30.
Tillman, T. W., and Carhart, T. (1966). “An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words”: Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. Technical Report No. SAM-TR-66-55, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas.
31.
Tong
, Y. C.
, and Clark
, G. M.
(1986
). “Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
79
, 1958
–66
. 32.
Townshend
, B.
, Cotter
, N.
, Van Compernolle
, D.
, and White
, R. L.
(1987
). “Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
, 106
–15
. 33.
Tye-Murray
, N.
, and Tyler
, R. S.
(1989
). “Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users
,” Ear Hear.
10
(5
), 292
–8
. 34.
Tyler
, R. S.
, and Moore
, B. C.
(1992
). “Consonant recognition by some of the better cochlear-implant patients
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
, 3068
–77
. 35.
Tyler, R. S., Preece, J. P., and Tye-Murray, N. (1986). The Iowa Phoneme and Sentence Tests (a laser video disc with consonant, vowel, and sentence tests), Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
36.
Zwolan
, T. A.
, Collins
, L. M.
, and Wakefield
, G. H.
(1997
). “Electrode discrimination and speech perception in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
, 3673
–3685
.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1999 Acoustical Society of America.
1999
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.