It is widely recognized that the sensitivity of hydrophones used to measure medical diagnostic ultrasound fields should be uniform over several octaves above the center frequency (i.e., above the mean of the upper and lower −3 dB frequencies in the transmitted acoustic-pressure spectrum). However, a bandwidth extending to at least ten times below the diagnostic pulse-center frequency is needed for accurate (error ≈5%) measurement of the peak rarefactional pressure. Since at present it is not common for manufacturers of medical-use hydrophones to provide sensitivity information below 1–2 MHz, a study was undertaken to determine these low-frequency sensitivities. The technique uses broadband, plane-wave pressure pulses generated by electrical short-pulse excitation of a thick piezoelectric ceramic disk. The hydrophone response is calculated from measurements of the source transducer and hydrophone-voltage waveforms. The frequency responses of both needle-type and spot-poled membrane polymer hydrophones were measured using this technique. The spot-poled membrane hydrophones had −3-dB bandwidths extending below 0.2 MHz, the lower limit for the calibration technique. The needle-type hydrophones studied, however, all exhibited a response roll-off of greater than 3 dB in the frequency range studied. Therefore, given the above bandwidth criterion as a function of diagnostic pulse-center frequency, the sensitivity to at least 0.2 MHz should be established for diagnostic-use hydrophones, because a uniform response below 1 MHz cannot be assumed.  

1.
G. R.
Harris
, “
Are current hydrophone low frequency response standards acceptable for measuring mechanical/cavitation indices?
,”
Ultrasonics
34
(
6
),
649
654
(
1996
).
2.
G. R.
Harris
,
M. R.
Myers
, and
P. M.
Gammell
, “
The response of transiently-excited thick transducers at low frequencies
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
3115
3120
(
1996
).
3.
P.
Schnabel
, “
Dispersion of thickness vibrations of piezoceramic disk resonators
,”
IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason.
25
,
16
24
(
1978
).
4.
G. R.
Harris
,
E. F.
Carome
, and
H. D.
Dardy
, “
An analysis of pulsed ultrasonic fields as measured by PVDF spot-poled membrane hydrophones
,”
IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason.
30
,
295
303
(
1983
).
5.
J. C.
Baboux
,
F.
Lakestani
, and
M.
Pedrix
, “
Theoretical and experimental study of the contribution of radial modes to the pulsed ultrasonic field radiated by a thick piezoelectric disk
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
75
,
1722
1731
(
1984
).
6.
H.
Jaffe
and
D. A.
Berlincourt
, “
Piezoelectric transducer materials
,”
Proc. IEEE
53
,
1372
1386
(
1965
).
7.
W. S. Burdic, Underwater Acoustic System Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984), pp. 77–79.
8.
Y.
Nakamura
and
T.
Otani
, “
Study of surface elastic wave induced on backing material and diffracted field of a piezoelectric polymer film hydrophone
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
,
1191
1199
(
1993
).
9.
S. P. Robinson, “A comparison of the frequency response of membrane and needle probe PVDF hydrophones,” in Physics in Medical Ultrasound II, edited by D. Evans and K. Martin (Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine, York, UK, 1988), pp. 79–86.
10.
B.
Fay
,
G.
Ludwig
,
C.
Lankjaer
, and
P. A.
Lewin
, “
Frequency response of PVDF needle-type hydrophones
,”
Ultrasound Med. Biol.
20
,
361
366
(
1994
).
11.
D. S.
Jones
, “
Scattering of a scalar wave by a semi-infinite rod of circular cross section
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
247
,
499
528
(
1955
).
12.
R. C.
Preston
,
D. R.
Bacon
, and
R. A.
Smith
, “
Calibration of medical ultrasonic equipment-procedures and accuracy assessment
,”
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq.
35
,
110
121
(
1988
).
13.
S. P. Robinson and G. R. Doré, “Uncertainties in the calibration of hydrophones at NPL by the three-transducer spherical-wave reciprocity method in the frequency range 10 kHz to 500 kHz,” NPL Report RSA(EXT)0054 (National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK, November 1994).
14.
J. C. Baboux, H. Djelouah, and M. Pedrix, “Interferometric measurements of transient ultrasonic fields: application to hydrophone calibration,” in Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium (IEEE, New York, 1988), pp. 857–861.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.