Bottom scatter strength data exhibit artifacts when the sub-bottom plays a role in the scattering process. The artifacts arise from the classical assumption in the data processing that the scattering process occurs at the water–sediment interface. Many of the current bottom scattering models, even those that explicitly treat sub-bottom scattering, do not address these artifacts. A new bottom scatter modeling approach is proposed. The essence of the approach is to (1) employ a geoacoustic model capable of predicting the sub-bottom insonified field, (2) avoid the usual plane-wave assumption, and (3) compute the received level in the time domain. The first condition suggests the analysis of bottom loss data concurrent with bottom scatter data and leads naturally to the idea of a self-consistent geoacoustic basis. The model is employed to analyze a data set that showed surprising discrepancies between low angle (<20°) and intermediate angle (28°–50°) bottom scattering strength. The proposed acoustic model predicts this discrepancy, which arises from the fact that the two angular regimes are controlled by entirely different scattering mechanisms. The difference in mechanisms suggests caution in the current and common practice of extrapolation from survey (intermediate angle) measurements to the low angles of interest for system performance prediction.

1.
Achenbach
,
J. D.
,
Gautesen
,
A. K.
, and
McMaken
,
H.
(
1978
). “
Diffraction of point source signals by a circular crack
,”
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
68
,
889
905
.
2.
Cook
,
H. E.
(
1979
). “
Ancient continental slope sequences and their value in understanding modern slope development
,”
Soc Econ. Pal. and Min. Special Publication
No.
27
, pp.
287
305
.
3.
Hamilton
,
E. L.
(
1980
). “
Geoacoustic modeling of the seafloor
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
68
,
1313
1339
.
4.
Henyey
,
F. S.
,
Thorsos
,
E. I.
, and
Nathwani
,
K. M.
(
1995
). “
Scattering strength cannot depend on the length of the pulse
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
2986
2987
.
5.
Holland
,
C. W.
, and
Muncill
,
G.
(
1993
). “
Acoustic reflection from quasi-periodic sedimentary sequences
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
,
1609
1620
.
6.
Ivakin
,
A. N.
, and
Lysanov
,
Yu. P.
(
1981
). “
Theory of underwater sound scattering by random inhomogeneities of the bottom
,”
Sov. Phys. Acoust.
27
,
61
64
.
7.
Kristensson
,
G.
, and
Waterman
,
P. C.
(
1982
). “
The T matrix for acoustic and electromagnetic scattering for circular disks
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
,
1612
1625
.
8.
Mourad
,
P. D.
, and
Jackson
,
D. R.
(
1993
). “
A model/data comparison for low-frequency bottom backscatter
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
,
344
358
.
9.
Ogden, P. M. (1992). “Low frequency bottom and surface scattering measurements using SUS charges in the Ionian Sea during CST-5,” Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, 30 April 1992.
10.
Reilly, S., and Sundvik, M. (1992). “CST-5 direct path, active waveform bottom reverberation analysis,” TRACOR Doc No. T92-95-1013-U.
11.
Schmidt, H. (1988). “SAFARI: Seismo-Acoustic Fast Field Algorithm for Range Independent Environments,” Report No. SR-113, SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy.
12.
Simons
,
D. A.
(
1980
). “
Scattering of elastic waves by thin inclusions
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
51
,
934
940
.
13.
Tang
,
D. J.
, and
Frisk
,
G.
(
1992
). “
Spectral parameterization of scattering from a random ocean bottom
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
2792
2799
.
14.
Westwood
,
E.
, and
Vidmar
,
P.
(
1987
). “
Eigenray finding and time series simulation in a layered-bottom ocean
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
,
912
924
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.