A multi-level optimization approach for the design of feedforward active structural acoustic control (ASAC) systems is presented. The formulation takes advantage that both the structural response and the acoustic radiation from a controlled structure can be completely defined in the modal domain. All the physical parameters that define the control inputs and the error sensors are defined in the modal domain in terms of the unit modal control forces and the modal error sensor components, respectively. The upper level of the optimization solves for the optimum modal parameters that minimize the total radiated acoustic power. Then, these optimum modal parameters are used in a set of lower level or physical domain optimization problems to determine the physical characteristics of the actuators and sensors to be implemented. Since the response of the system is evaluated in the upper level using a modal approach, the formulation permits the implementation of numerical techniques and/or experimental data during the design process. Therefore, the proposed methodology can be used for the design of control systems for realistic structures with complex disturbances in an efficient manner. The design formulation is illustrated for the case of a simply supported plate excited by an off-resonance disturbance.

1.
C. R. Fuller, “Apparatus and methods for global noise reduction,” U.S. Patent No. 4,715,599 (1987).
2.
C. R. Fuller, S. J. Elliot, and P. A. Nelson, Active Control of Vibration (Academic, San Diego, CA, 1996).
3.
B. T. Wang, R. A. Burdisso, and C. R. Fuller, “Optimal placement of piezoelectric actuators for active control of sound radiation from elastic plates,” Proceedings of Noise-Con 91, Tarrytown, New York, 14–16 July 1991, 267–275 (1991).
4.
C. E.
Ruckman
and
C. R.
Fuller
, “
Using multiple regression and subset selection to optimize actuator locations in feedforward active control systems
”,
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
2410
(A) (
1992
).
5.
R. H. Cabell, H. C. Lester, G. P. Mathur, and B. N. Tran, “Optimization of actuator arrays for aircraft interior noise control,” 15th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, Long Beach, California, 25–27 October 1993, 1–10 (1993).
6.
R. A.
Burdisso
and
C. R.
Fuller
, “
Design of active structural acoustic control systems by eigenproperty assignment
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
1582
1591
(
1994
).
7.
M. T. Simpson and C. H. Hansen, “Use of genetic algorithms for optimizing vibration actuator placement for minimizing sound transmission into enclosed spaces,” Proceedings of Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, California, 26–29 February 1996.
8.
H. M.
Rodriguez
and
R. A.
Burdisso
, “
Sensitivity analysis for feedforward control system design
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
3352
3359
(
1995
).
9.
F. Fahy, Sound and Structural Vibration (Academic, Orlando, FL, 1985).
10.
M. C. Junger and D. Feit, Sound, Structures and Their Interaction (Acoustical Society of America, Woodbury, NY, 1993).
11.
R. D. Ciskowski and C. A. Brebbia, Boundary Element Methods in Acoustics (Comp. Mechanics Publications, Boston, 1991).
12.
H. M. Rodrı́guez, “Optimum design for feedforward structural-acoustic control of complex structural systems,” Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, VPI&SU (1996).
13.
The MathWorks, Inc., Optimization Toolbox User’s Guide (Natick, MA, 1992).
14.
E. K.
Dimitriadis
,
C. R.
Fuller
, and
C. R.
Rogers
, “
Piezoelectric actuators for distributed vibration excitation of thin plates
,”
J. Vib. Acoust.
113
,
100
107
(
1989
).
15.
D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.