This study examined the effect of sentence context and local acoustic structure on phoneme categorization. Target stimuli from a 10-step GOAT–COAT continuum, differing only on a temporal cue for voice onset time (VOT), were embedded in carrier sentences that biased interpretation toward either “goat” or “coat.” While subjects listened to the sentences they also responded as quickly as possible to a visual probe by indicating whether the probe matched the target stimulus they heard. Results showed that the interaction of VOT and sentence context significantly affected both identification and RT for stimuli near the perceptual boundary; the identification function showed a boundary shift in favor of the biased context and peak response times for each context reflected the shifted identification boundaries. In addition, response times were faster for identification of stimuli near the category boundary when responses were congruent, rather than incongruent with the sentence context. The response time differences for congruent versus incongruent responses in the boundary region are interpreted as depending on the results of initial phonological analysis; potentially ambiguous categorizations may be subject to additional evaluation in which a context-congruent response is both preferred and available earlier.

1.
Boothroyd
,
A.
, and
Nittrouer
,
S.
(
1988
). “
Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
,
101
114
.
2.
Clifton
,
C.
,
Frazier
,
L.
, and
Connine
,
C.
(
1984
). “
Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension
,”
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
23
,
696
708
.
3.
Connine, C. M. (1987). “Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context,” Journal of Memory and Language 26, 527–538.
4.
Connine
,
C. M.
, and
Clifton
,
C.
, Jr.
(
1987
). “
Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception
,”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
13
,
291
299
.
5.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind (MIT, Cambridge, MA).
6.
Fodor
,
J. A.
,
Ni
,
W.
,
Crain
,
S.
, and
Shankweiler
,
D.
(
1996
). “
Tasks and timing in the perception of linguistic anomaly
,”
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
25
,
25
57
.
7.
Forster, K. I. (1979). “Levels of structure of the language processor,” in Sentence Processing, edited by W. Cooper and E. Walker (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).
8.
Ganong
III,
W. F.
(
1980
). “
Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception
,”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
6
,
110
125
.
9.
Lewis, J. R., Shapiro, L. P., Tuller, B., and Afton, R. (1998). “Local contextual impenetrability of lexical access and gap-filling,” Poster presented at the Tenth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Santa Monica, CA.
10.
Liberman
,
A. M.
,
Cooper
,
F. S.
,
Shankweiler
,
D. P.
, and
Studdert-Kennedy
,
M.
(
1967
). “
Perception of the speech code
,”
Psychol. Rev.
74
,
431
461
.
11.
Liberman
,
A.
,
Harris
,
K. S.
,
Hoffman
,
H. S.
, and
Griffith
,
B. C.
(
1957
). “
The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.
54
,
358
368
.
12.
McClelland
,
J. L.
, and
Elman
,
J. L.
(
1986
). “
The TRACE model of speech perception
,”
Cogn. Psychol.
18
,
1
86
.
13.
MacDonald
,
M. C.
,
Pearlmutter
,
N. J.
, and
Seidenberg
,
M. S.
(
1994
). “
Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
,”
Psychol. Rev.
101
,
676
703
.
14.
Nicol, J., and Swinney, D. (1989). “The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension,” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18, 5–19.
15.
Nicol, J., Swinney, D., Love, T., and Hald, L. (1997). “Examination of sentence processing with continuous vs. interrupted presentation paradigms.” Center for Human Information Processing Technical Report, #97-2, University of California, San Diego.
16.
Nittrouer
,
S.
, and
Boothroyd
,
A.
(
1990
). “
Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
2705
2715
.
17.
Repp, B. H., and Liberman, A. M. (1990). “Phonetic category boundaries are flexible,” in Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Perception, edited by S. Harnad (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, MA), pp. 89–112.
18.
Rubin
,
P.
,
Turvey
,
M. T.
, and
Van Gelder
,
P.
(
1976
). “
Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than in spoken nonwords
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
19
,
394
398
.
19.
Shapiro, L. P., Nagel, H. N., and Levine, B. A. (1993). “Preferences for a verb’s complements and their use,” Journal of Memory and Language 32, 96–114.
20.
Shapiro
,
L. P.
,
Zurif
,
E. B.
, and
Grimshaw
,
J.
(
1987
). “
Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs
,”
Cognition
27
,
219
246
.
21.
Shapiro
,
L. P.
,
Zurif
,
E. B.
, and
Grimshaw
,
J.
(
1989
). “
Verb processing during sentence comprehension: Contextual impenetrability
,”
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
18
,
223
243
.
22.
Swinney
,
D. A.
(
1979
). “
Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects
,”
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
18
,
645
659
.
23.
Swinney, D. A., and Osterhout, L. (1990). “Inference generation during auditory language comprehension,” in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 25, edited by A. Graesser and G. Bowers (Academic, New York), pp. 17–33.
24.
Warren
,
R. M.
(
1970
). “
Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds
,”
Science
267
,
392
393
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.