The problem addressed in this paper is whether higher order correlation detectors can perform better in white noise than the cross correlation detector for the detection of a known transient source signal, if additional receiver information is included in the higher order correlations. While the cross correlation is the optimal linear detector for white noise, additional receiver information in the higher order correlations makes them nonlinear. In this paper, formulas that predict the performance of higher order correlation detectors of energy signals are derived for a known source signal. Given the first through fourth order signal moments and the noise variance, the formulas predict the SNR for which the detectors achieve a probability of detection of 0.5 for any level of false alarm, when noise at each receiver is independent and identically distributed. Results show that the performance of the cross correlation, bicorrelation, and tricorrelation detectors are proportional to the second, fourth, and sixth roots of the sampling interval, respectively, but do not depend on the observation time. Also, the SNR gains of the higher order correlation detectors relative to the cross correlation detector improve with decreasing probability of false alarm. The source signal may be repeated in higher order correlations, and gain formulas are derived for these cases as well. Computer simulations with several test signals are compared to the performance predictions of the formulas. The breakdown of the assumptions for signals with too few sample points is discussed, as are limitations on the design of signals for improved higher order gain. Results indicate that in white noise it is difficult for the higher order correlation detectors in a straightforward application to achieve better performance than the cross correlation.

1.
Baugh
,
K. W.
, and
Hardwicke
,
K. R.
(
1994
). “
On the detection of transient signals using spectral correlation
,”
Circuits Syst. Signal Process.
13
,
467
479
.
2.
Bracewell, R. N. (1986). The Fourier Transform and Its Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp. 189–198.
3.
Delaney
,
P. A.
(
1994
). “
Signal detection using third order moments
,”
Circuits Syst. Signal Process.
13
,
481
496
.
4.
Dwyer
,
R. F.
(
1984
). “
Use of the kurtosis statistic in the frequency domain as an aid in detecting random signals
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.
9
,
85
92
.
5.
Egan, J. P. (1975). Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis (Academic, New York), pp. 61–63.
6.
Gardner, W. A. (1986). Introduction to Random Processes With Applications to Signals and Systems (Macmillan, New York), pp. 269–272.
7.
Hinich
,
M. J.
(
1990
). “
Detecting a transient signal by bispectral analysis
,”
IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process.
38
,
1277
1283
.
8.
Hinich
,
M. J.
, and
Wilson
,
G. R.
(
1990
). “
Detection of non-Gaussian signals in non-Gaussian noise using the bispectrum
,”
IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process.
38
,
1126
1131
.
9.
Ioup, G. E., Ioup, J. W., Barnes, K. H., Field, R. L., Leclere, J. H., and Rayborn, G. H. (1989). “Evaluation of bicorrelations for transient detection,” Proceedings of the Workshop on Higher-Order Spectral Analysis, Vail, CO, 46–51.
10.
Ioup
,
G. E.
,
Pflug
,
L. A.
, and
Ioup
,
J. W.
(
1995
). “
Effect of ergodicity failure on detection performance prediction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
3311
(A).
11.
Isserlis
,
L.
(
1918
). “
On a formula for the product-moment coefficient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any number of variables
,”
Biometrika
12
,
134
139
.
12.
Kletter
,
D.
, and
Messer
,
H.
(
1990
). “
Suboptimal detection of non-Gaussian signals by third-order spectral analysis
,”
IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process.
38
,
901
909
.
13.
Nuttall, A. H. (1994). “Detection performance of power-law processors for random signals of unknown location, structure, extent, and strength,” NUWC-NPT Technical Report 10,751.
14.
Pflug, L. A. (1990). “Higher order correlations and spectra for the detection of deterministic transients,” M.S. thesis, University of New Orleans.
15.
Pflug
,
L. A.
,
Ioup
,
G. E.
,
Ioup
,
J. W.
, and
Field
,
R. L.
(
1992a
). “
Properties of higher order correlations and spectra for bandlimited deterministic transients
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
975
988
.
16.
Pflug
,
L. A.
,
Ioup
,
G. E.
,
Ioup
,
J. W.
,
Barnes
,
K. H.
,
Field
,
R. L.
, and
Rayborn
,
G. H.
(
1992b
). “
Detection of oscillatory and impulsive transients using higher-order correlations and spectra
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
2763
2776
.
17.
Pflug
,
L. A.
,
Ioup
,
G. E.
, and
Ioup
,
J. W.
(
1993
). “
Sampling requirements and aliasing for higher-order correlations
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
,
2159
2172
.
18.
Pflug
,
L. A.
,
Ioup
,
G. E.
, and
Ioup
,
J. W.
(
1994a
). “
Active detection prediction using higher-order moments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
2982
.
19.
Pflug
,
L. A.
,
Ioup
,
G. E.
,
Ioup
,
J. W.
, and
Field
,
R. L.
(
1994b
). “
Prefiltering for improved correlation detection of bandlimited transient signals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
1459
1473
.
20.
Pflug, L. A., Ioup, G. E., and Ioup, J. W. (1995a). “Performance prediction formulas for higher order correlation detection of energy signals,” Proceedings of the IEEE Signal Processing/ATHOS Workshop on Higher-Order Statistics, Begur, Spain, 152–156.
21.
Pflug
,
L. A.
,
Ioup
,
G. E.
,
Ioup
,
J. W.
, and
Field
,
R. L.
(
1995b
). “
Prediction of SNR gain for passive higher order correlation detection of energy transients
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
248
260
.
22.
Sangfelt, E., and Persson, L. (1993). “Experimental performance of some higher-order cumulant detectors for hydroacoustic transients,” Proceedings of the IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Higher-Order Statistics, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 182–186.
23.
Tague
,
J. A.
,
Pike
,
C. M.
, and
Sullivan
,
E. J.
(
1994
). “
Active sonar detection in multipath: A new bispectral analysis approach
,”
Circuits Syst. Signal Process.
18
,
455
466
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.