The effects of bird song imply a transfer of information between conspecifics. This communication channel is constrained by habitat-induced degradation. Many studies suggest that birds can utilize features of degraded song to assess relative distance to the signaller (ranging). The degradation of transmitted song in the wren Troglodytes troglodytes is quantified to assess the opportunities offered in received song for both information transfer and ranging. This quantification incorporates three measurable aspects of degradation: signal-to-noise ratio; excess attenuation; blur ratio. Each aspect varies more-or-less predictably with transmission distance, i.e., a criterion for ranging. Significant effects of speaker and microphone elevation indicate a potential for birds to optimize both the opportunity for information transfer and ranging by considering perch location. Song elements are the smallest units of a song being defined as a continuous trace on a sonagram. Main and second-order effects of element type indicate element-specific patterns of degradation which could be a crucial factor in communication in this species. The element variation within a full song offers the potential for effective information transfer over a range of relevant distances and a variety of transmission pathways. It similarly offers highly flexible ranging opportunities.
REFERENCES
1.
Brémond
, J. C.
, and Aubin
, T.
(1990
). “Responses to distress calls by black-headed gulls Laris ridibundus: The role of non-degraded features
,” Anim. Behav.
39
, 503
–511
. 2.
Brémond, J. C., and Kreutzer, M. (1986). “Comment le chant du troglodyte (Troglodytes troglodytes) émerge du bruit,” Behaviour 98, 361–370.
3.
Brenowitz
, E. A.
(1982
). “The active space of Red-winged Blackbird song
,” J. Comp. Physiol.
147
, 511
–522
. 4.
Cramp, S. (editor) (1988). Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The birds of the Western Palearctic Vol. 5. Tyrant Flycatchers to Thrushes (Oxford U.P., London), pp. 525–542.
5.
Dabelsteen, T. (1981). “The sound pressure level in the dawn song of the blackbird Turdus merula and a method for adjusting the level in experimental song to the level in natural song,” Z. Tierpsychol. 56, 137–149.
6.
Dabelsteen
, T.
, and Pedersen
, S. B.
(1985
). “A method for computerized modification of certain natural animal sounds for communication study purposes
,” Biol. Cybern.
52
, 399
–404
. 7.
Dabelsteen, T., and Pedersen, S. B. (1992). “Song features essential for species discrimination and behaviour assessment by male blackbirds (Turdus merula),” Behaviour 121, 259–287.
8.
Dabelsteen
, T.
, and Pedersen
, S. B.
(1993
). “Song-based species discrimination and behaviour assessment by female blackbirds (Turdus merula)
,” Anim. Behav.
45
, 759
–771
. 9.
Dabelsteen
, T.
, Larsen
, O. N.
, and Pedersen
, S. B.
(1993
). “Habitat-induced degradation of sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
, 2206
–2220
. 10.
Dooling, R. J. (1982). “Auditory perception in birds,” in Acoustic Comminucation in birds, Vol. 1, edited by D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Academic, New York), pp. 131–181.
11.
Kaiser, J. F. (1974). “Nonrecursive digital filter design using the Io-sinh window function,” in Proceedings of the 1974 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, edited by S. R. Parker (IEEE, New York), pp. 20–23.
12.
Klump, G. M. (1996). “Bird communication in the noisy world,” in Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, edited by D. M. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Cornell U.P., Ithaca, NY), pp. 321–328.
13.
Larsen, O. N., and Dabelsteen, T. (1990). “Directionality of blackbird vocalization. Implications for vocal communication and its further study,” Ornis. Scand. 21, 37–45.
14.
Larsen, O. N., and Dabelsteen, T. (1997). “The l”Vifa Neodymium Tweeter: a versatile speaker for playback experiments,” Bioacoustics 8, 323–326.
15.
Lemon
, R. E.
, Struger
, M.
, Lechowicz
, M. J.
, and Norman
, R. F.
(1981
). “Song features and singing heights of American warblers: Maximization or optimization of distance?
” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
69
, 1169
–1176
. 16.
Marten, K., and Marler, P. (1977). “Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalizations,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2, 271–290.
17.
Mathevon
, N.
, and Aubin
, T.
(1997
). “Reaction to couspecific degraded song by the wren Troglodytes troglodytes: Territorial response and choice of song post
,” Behav. Process.
39
, 77
–84
. 18.
Mathevon, N., Aubin, T., and Dabelsteen, T. (1996). “Song degradation during propagation: Importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes,” Ethology 102, 397–412.
19.
McGregor
, P. K.
, and Falls
, J. B.
(1984
). “The response of Western Meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta) to the playback of undegraded and degraded songs
,” Can. J. Zool.
62
, 2125
–2128
. 20.
McGregor, P. K., and Krebs, J. R. (1984). “Sound degradation as a distance cue in great tit (Parus major) song,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16, 49–56.
21.
McGregor, P. K., Krebs, J. R., and Ratcliffe, L. M. (1983). “The reaction of great tits (Parus major) to playback of degraded and undegraded songs: the effect of familiarity with the stimulus song,” The Auk 100, 898–906.
22.
Michelsen, A. (1978). “Sound reception in different environments,” in Sensory Ecology, edited by M. A. Ali (Plenum, New York), pp. 345–373.
23.
Michelsen, A., and Larsen, O. N. (1983). “Strategies for acoustic communication in complex environments,” in Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology, edited by F. Huber and H. Markl (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), pp. 321–331.
24.
Michelsen, A., and Rohrseitz, K. (1997). “Sound localization in a habitat: an analytical approach to quantifying degradation of directional cues,” Bioacoustics 7, 291–313.
25.
Morton
, E. S.
(1975
). “Ecological sources of selection of avian sounds
,” Am. Nat.
109
, 17
–34
. 26.
Naguib
, M.
(1995a
). “Auditory distance estimation of singing conspecifics in Carolina wrens: The role of reverberation and frequency-dependent attenuation
,” Anim. Behav.
50
, 1297
–1307
. 27.
Naguib, M. (1995b). “Perception of auditory distance in song-birds and its implications for long-range communications,” Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
28.
Naguib, M. (1996). “Ranging by song in Carolina wrens Thryothorus ludovicianus: Effects of environmental acoustics and strength of song degradation,” Behaviour 133, 541–559.
29.
Pedersen, S. B. (1996). “Preliminary operation manual for signal processor SIGPRO,” Center for Sound Communication, Odense University, DK.
30.
Piercy
, J. E.
, Embleton
, T. F. W.
, and Sutherland
, L. C.
(1977
). “Review of noise propagation in the atmosphere
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
, 1403
–1418
. 31.
Richards, D. G. (1981). “Estimation of distance of singing conspecifics by the carolina wren,” The Auk 98, 127–133.
32.
Richards
, D. G.
, and Wiley
, R. H.
(1980
). “Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: Implications for animal communication
,” Am. Nat.
115
, 381
–399
. 33.
Robisson, P. (1987). “L’adaptation des règles de décodage des signaux acoustiques des oiseaux au canal de transmission. Etude appliquée aux cris de detresse du vanneau huppé Vanellus vanellus,” C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 304, 275–278.
34.
Shy, E., and Morton, E. S. (1986). “The role of distance, familiarity, and time of day in Carolina wrens responses to conspecific songs,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 393–400.
35.
Van Horne
, B.
(1995
). “Assessing vocal variety in the winter wren, a bird with a complex repertoire
,” Condor
97
, 39
–49
. 36.
Wiley
, R. H.
(1991
). “Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America
,” Am. Nat.
138
, 973
–993
. 37.
Wiley, R. H., and Godard, R. (1996). “Ranging of conspecific songs by Kentucky warblers and its implications for interactions of territorial males,” Behaviour 133, 81–102.
38.
Wiley, R. H., and Richards, D. G. (1978). “Physical constraints on acoustic communication and the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3, 69–94.
39.
Wiley, R. H., and Richards, D. G. (1982). “Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: Transmission and signal detection,” in Acoustic Comminucation in Birds, Vol. 1, edited by D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Academic, New York), pp. 131–181.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1998 Acoustical Society of America.
1998
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
