Call production in budgerigars was studied using operant conditioning. In several experiments, budgerigars were reinforced with food for producing calls that were above or below a criterion level of intensity. This differential reinforcement procedure was successful in controlling vocal intensity in both directions showing that the intensity with which budgerigars produce vocalizations is under voluntary control. In additional experiments, call intensity maintained by food reinforcement was measured both in the quiet and in the presence of various levels of broadband noise. Call intensity in budgerigars increased significantly in noise, paralleling the well-known Lombard effect in humans which is the reflexive increase in speech intensity during communication in noise. Call intensity was measured in broadband noise and in a notched noise (no energy between 1.5 and 4.5 kHz) with the same overall level. Results show that noise in the spectral region of contact calls is most effective in causing an increase in vocal intensity. In aggregate, these experiments show that budgerigars have voluntary control over the intensive aspect of their vocalizations, that they normally monitor their vocal output though external auditory feedback, and, like humans, they exhibit the Lombard effect.
REFERENCES
1.
Binnie, C. A., Daniloff, R. G., and Buckingham, H. W. (1982). “Phonetic disintegration in a five-year-old following sudden hearing loss,” J. Speech Hear. Disorders 47, 181–189.
2.
Borden, G. (1979). “An interpretation of research on feedback interruption during speech,” Brain and Lang. 7, 302–319.
3.
Cowie, R., and Douglas-Cowie, E. (1983). “Speech production in profound postlingual deafness,” in Hearing Science and Hearing Disorders, edited by M. Lutman and M. Haggard (Academic, New York), pp. 183–231.
4.
Cynx
, J.
, Williams
, H.
, and Nottebohm
, F.
(1990
). “Timbre discrimination in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) song syllables
,” J. Comp. Psych.
104
, 303
–308
. 5.
Cynx, J., Lewis, B., Tavel, B., and Tse, H. (1997). “Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in a song bird,” Abstracts of the 20th Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
6.
Dooling
, R. J.
(1986
). “Perception of vocal signals by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)
,” Exp. Biol.
45
, 195
–218
. 7.
Dooling
, R. J.
, Ryals
, B. M.
, and Manabe
, K.
(1997
). “Recovery of hearing and vocal behavior after hair cell regeneration
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94
, 14
206
14
210
. 8.
Dooling
, R. J.
, Gephart
, B. F.
, Price
, P. H.
, McHale
, C.
, and Brauth
, S. E.
(1987
). “Effects of deafening on the contact call of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus)
,” Animal Beh.
35
, 1264
–1266
. 9.
Dreher
, J. J.
, and O’Neill
, J. J.
(1958
). “Effects of ambient noise on speaker intelligibility of words and phrases
,” Laryngoscope
68
, 539
–548
. 10.
Farabaugh
, S. M.
, Linzenbold
, A.
, and Dooling
, R. J.
(1994
). “Vocal plasticity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Evidence for social factors in the learning of contact calls
,” J. Comp. Psych.
108
, 81
–92
. 11.
Gardner
, M. B.
(1964
). “Effect of noise on listening levels in conference telephony
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
, 2354
–2362
. 12.
Gardner
, M. B.
(1966
). “Effect of noise, system gain, and assigned task on talking levels in loudspeaker communication
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
40
, 955
–965
. 13.
Ginsburg
, N.
(1960
). “Conditioned vocalization in the budgerigar
,” J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.
53
, 183
–186
. 14.
Goehl, H., and Kaufman, D. (1984). “Do the effects of adventitious deafness include disordered speech,” J. Speech Hear. Dis. 13, 397–418.
15.
Heaton, J. T., Dooling, R. J., and Farabaugh, S. M. (submitted). “Effect of deafening on the vocalizations of adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus),” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
16.
Konishi, M. (1963). “The role of auditory feedback in the vocal behavior of the domestic fowl,” Z. Tierpsychol. 20, 349–367.
17.
Konishi
, M.
(1964
). “Effects of deafening on song development in two species of juncos
,” Condor
66
, 85
–102
. 18.
Konishi, M. (1965a). “The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow,” Z. Tierpsychol. 22, 770–783.
19.
Konishi, M. (1965b). “Effects of deafening on song development in American robins and black-headed grosbeaks,” Z. Tierpsychol. 22, 584–599.
20.
Kroodsma, D. E., and Miller, E. H., Eds. (1982). Acoustic Communication in Birds (Academic, New York).
21.
Kroodsma, D. E., and Miller, E. H., Eds. (1996). Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (Cornell U.P., Ithaca, NY).
22.
Kroodsma
, D. F.
, and Konishi
, M.
(1991
). “A suboscine bird (eastern phoebe, Sayornis phoebe) develops normal song without auditory feedback
,” Animal Beh.
42
, 477
–487
. 23.
Kuhl, P. K. (1989). “On babies, birds, modules, and mechanisms: A comparative approach to the acquisition of vocal communication,” in The Comparative Psychology of Audition: Perceiving Complex Sounds, edited by R. J. Dooling and S. H. Hulse (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).
24.
Lancaster, W. C., Keating, A. W., and Henson, O. W. (1992). “Ultrasonic vocalization of flying bats monitored by radiotelemetry,” J. Exp. Biol. 173, 43–58.
25.
Lane
, H. L.
, and Tranel
, B.
(1971
). “The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
14
, 677
–709
. 26.
Lane
, H. L.
, and Webster
, J. W.
(1991
). “Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
, 859
–866
. 27.
Manabe, K., and Dooling, R. (1997). “Control of Vocal Production in Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Selective Reinforcement, Call Differentiation, and Stimulus Control,” Behav. Proc. 41, 117–132.
28.
Manabe
, K.
, Cleaveland
, M. J.
, and Staddon
, J. E. R.
(1997
). “Control of Vocal Repertoire by Reward in Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)
,” J. Comp. Psych.
111
, 50
–62
. 29.
Manabe, K., Kawashima T., and Staddon, J. E. R. (1995). “Differential vocalization in Budgerigars: Towards an experimental analysis of naming,” J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 63, 111–126.
30.
Marler
, P.
, Konishi
, M.
, Lutjen
, A.
, and Waser
, M. S.
(1973
). “Effects of continuous noise on avian hearing and vocal development
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
70
, 1393
–1396
. 31.
Marler
, P.
, Mundinger
, P.
, Waser
, M. S.
, and Lujen
, A.
(1972
). “Effects of acoustical stimulation and deprivation on song development in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus)
,” Animal Beh.
20
, 586
–606
. 32.
Martony, J. (1968). “On the correction of the voice pitch level for the severely hard of hearing subjects,” Am. Ann. Deaf. 113, 195–202.
33.
Monsen
, R. B.
(1978a
). “Toward measuring how well hearing-impaired children speak
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
21
, 197
–219
. 34.
Monsen
, R. B.
(1978b
). “Acoustic qualities of phonation in young hearing-impaired children
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
22
, 270
–288
. 35.
Monsen, R. B. (1979). “The production of labial occlusives in young hearing-impaired children,” Lang. Speech 22, 311–317.
36.
Nordeen, K. W., and Nordeen, E. J. (1992). “Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches,” Behav. Neur. Biol. 57, 58–66.
37.
Nottebohm
, F.
(1968
). “Auditory experience and song development in the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs)
,” Science
110
, 549
–568
. 38.
Nottebohm
, F.
, and Nottebohm
, M. E.
(1971
). “Vocalizations and breeding behaviour of surgically deafened ring doves (Streptopelia risoria)
,” Animal Beh.
19
, 313
–327
. 39.
Pickett
, J. M.
(1958
). “Limits of direct speech communication in noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
30
, 278
–281
. 40.
Potash, L. M. (1972). “Noise induced changes in calls of the Japanese quail,” Psychon. Sci. 26, 252–254.
41.
Sadr, E. (1996). “The Lombard effect in Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) contact calls,” Senior Honor’s thesis submitted to the University of Maryland, College Park.
42.
Sinnott
, J. M.
, Stebbins
, W. C.
, and Moody
, D. B.
(1975
). “Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
58
, 412
–414
. 43.
Waldstein
, R. S.
(1990
). “Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: Implications for the role of auditory feedback
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
, 2099
–2114
. 44.
Williams
, H.
, Cynx
, J.
, and Nottebohm
, F.
(1989
). “Timbre control in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) song syllables
,” J. Comp. Psych.
103
, 366
–380
.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1998 Acoustical Society of America.
1998
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.