Audible electronic circuit noise generated within a hearing aid is distracting to a listener in quiet situations and, if the noise level is high enough, may cause listener irritation and rejection of the hearing aid. Thus for hearing aid specification and fitting purposes, it is useful to know the acoustic levels at which this internal noise may become audible and also at which it may become objectionable. For hearing aid amplifier circuit specification and design purposes, it is useful to know the same levels in electrical terms. This paper reports on a study that used an amplifier with no acoustic input and a hearing aid receiver output to simulate internally generated hearing aid circuit noise. Results are reported for testing eight subjects with high-frequency hearing loss for the perceived acoustic and electrical levels at which internal circuit noise became both audible and objectionable.

Topics
Acoustics, Hearing impairment, Hearing aids, Electronic circuits
1.
Agnew, J. (1988). “Hearing instrument distortion: What does it mean for the listener?,” Hear. Instr. 39, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 61.
2.
Agnew, J. (1996). “Perception of internally-generated noise in hearing amplification,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 7, 296–303.
3.
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) (1989). ANSI S3.6-1989, “American National Standard Specification for Audiometers” (Acoustical Society of America, New York).
4.
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) (1996). ANSI S3.22-1996, “American National Standard Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics” (Acoustical Society of America, New York).
5.
de Boer
,
E.
(
1962
). “
Note on the critical bandwidth
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
,
985
–
986
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
Dillon, H., and Macrae, J. (1984). “Derivation of design specifications for hearing aids,” National Acoustics Laboratories Report Number 102 (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia).
7.
Egan
,
J. P.
, and
Meyer
,
D. R.
(
1950
). “
Changes in pitch of tones of low frequency as a function of the pattern of excitation produced by a band of noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
22
,
827
–
833
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
Fielder, I. D. (1985). “The audibility of modulation noise in floating-point conversion systems,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 33, 770–781.
9.
Fish, P. J. (1994). Electronic Noise and Low Noise Design (McGraw-Hill, New York).
10.
Fletcher
,
H.
(
1940
). “
Auditory patterns
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
12
,
47
–
65
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
Gregorian, R., and Temes, G. C. (1986). Analog MOS Integrated Circuits for Signal Processing (Wiley, New York).
12.
Humes, L. E. (1994). “Psychoacoustic considerations in clinical audiology,” in Handbook of Clinical Audiology, edited by J. Katz (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore), 4th ed.
13.
Jirsa, R. E., and Norris, T. W. (1982). “Effects of intermodulation distortion on speech intelligibility,” Ear Hear. 3, 251–256.
14.
Killion
,
M. C.
(
1976
). “
Noise of ears and microphones
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
59
,
424
–
433
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
15.
Killion, M. C., and Revit, L. J. (1993). “CORFIG and GIFROC: Real ear to coupler and back,” in Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, edited by G. A. Studebaker and I. Hochberg (Allyn and Bacon, Boston), 2nd ed.
16.
Macrae, J., and Dillon, H. (1986). “Updated performance requirements for hearing aids,” National Acoustics Laboratories Report No. 109 (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia).
17.
Macrae, J., and Dillon, H. (1996). “An equivalent input noise level criterion for hearing aids,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 33, 355–362.
18.
Moore, B. C. J. (1982). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing (Academic, London).
19.
Moore, B. C. J. (1986). Frequency Selectivity in Hearing (Academic, London).
20.
Moore, B. C. J. (1995). Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage (Oxford U.P., Oxford).
21.
Stuart, J. R. (1994). “Noise: Methods for estimating detectability and threshold,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 42, 124–139.
22.
Teder, H. (1993). “Compression in the time domain,” Am. J. Audiol. 2, 41–46.
23.
Zwicker, E., and Fastl, H. (1990). Psychoacoustics, Facts and Models (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1997 Acoustical Society of America.
1997
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.