An active sonar using Polaroid electrostatic transducers positioned at the end of a robot arm is described that adaptively changes its location and configuration in response to the echoes it observes in order to recognize an object. The sonar mimics biological echo-location systems, such as those employed by bats and dolphins, in that there is a center transmitter flanked by two adjustable receivers, the sonar has rotational and translational mobility, and the echo processing contains elements that have been observed in the mammalian auditory system. Using information in the echoes, the sonar translates in a horizontal plane and rotates in pitch and yaw to position an object at a standard location within the beam patterns. The transmitter points at the object to maximize the incident acoustic intensity and the receivers rotate to maximize the echo amplitude and the bandwidth, and to minimize the echo-producing region. This procedure results in a unique echo vector associated with each object at a given object pose. Recognition is accomplished by extracting 32 values from the binaural echo patterns and searching a data base that is constructed during a learning phase. The system operation is illustrated by having it recognize rubber O-rings of different sizes and by differentiating the head and tail sides of a coin.

1.
P. E. Nachtigall and P. W. B. Moore, Animal Sonar: Processes and Performance (Plenum, New York, 1988).
2.
J. A.
Simmons
,
M. B.
Fenton
, and
M. J.
O’Farrell
, “
Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats
,”
Science
203
,
16
21
(
1979
).
3.
W. W. L. Au, The Sonar of Dolphins (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993).
4.
J. M. Richardson, K. A. Marsh, D. Gjellum, and M. Lasher, “Acoustic recognition of objects in robotics: Determination of type, pose, position, and orientation,” in Acoustic Imaging, edited by L. Kessler (Plenum, New York, 1988), pp. 613–620.
5.
H. L. Roitblat, P. W. B. Moore, P. E. Nachtigall, R. H. Penner, and W. W. L. Au, “Natural echolocation with an artificial network,” Int. J. Neural Networks 1, 239–248 (1989).
6.
I. E.
Dror
,
M.
Zagaeski
, and
C. F.
Moss
, “
Three-dimensional target recognition via sonar: A neural network model
,”
Neural Networks
8
,
149
160
(
1995
).
7.
K. Sasaki and M. Takano, “Classification of objects’ surface by acoustic transfer function,” in Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1992), pp. 821–828.
8.
C. Biber, S. Ellin, E. Sheck, and J. Stempeck, “The Polaroid ultrasonic ranging system,” in Proceedings of the 67th Audio Engineering Society Convention, 1990. Reprinted in Polaroid Ultrasonic Ranging System Handbook.
9.
R.
Kuc
, “
Biologically-motivated adaptive sonar system
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
1849
1854
(
1996
).
10.
A.
Freedman
, “
A mechanism of acoustic echo formation
,”
Acustica
12
,
10
21
(
1962
).
11.
A.
Freedman
, “
The high frequency echo structure of some simple body shapes
,”
Acustica
12
,
61
70
(
1962
).
12.
R. Kuc, “Fusing binaural sonar information for object recognition,” in Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE/SICE/RSJ International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1996), pp. 727–735.
13.
J. A.
Simmons
and
L.
Chen
, “
The acoustic basis for target discrimination by fm echo locating bats
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
86
,
1333
1350
(
1989
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.