Green and Dai [ in Auditory Physiology and Perception, edited by Y. Cazals, L. Demany, and K. Horner (Pergamon, Oxford, 1992)] reported a series of experiments which suggested that listeners’ ability to perform simultaneous across-frequency comparisons of intensity is severely impaired when the target and flanking components begin or end at different times. The present experiment sought to replicate the effect of onset asynchrony and included an additional condition in which the leading portion of the asynchronous target component was accompanied by a pair of “captor” tones. The intended purpose of the captor tones was to promote a perceptual organization in which the leading and synchronous portions of the asynchronous target component were grouped with different auditory objects. For all six listeners an asynchrony of 320 ms raised thresholds substantially relative to the synchronous onset condition, the magnitude of the increase ranging between 6 and 16 dB. By contrast, the mean elevation of threshold in the presence of the captor was only 3 dB, although for all listeners thresholds were still greater than for the synchronous onset condition. The results support the view that the deleterious effect of onset asynchrony on profile analysis performance is due to the operation of auditory grouping principles.

1.
Bernstein
,
L. R.
, and
Green
,
D. M.
(
1987
). “
The profile-analysis bandwidth
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
,
1888
1895
.
2.
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
1994
). “
Detecting mistuning in the presence of synchronous and asynchronous interfering sounds
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
2622
2630
.
3.
Ciocca
,
V.
, and
Darwin
,
C. J.
(
1993
). “
Effects of onset asynchrony on pitch perception: Adaptation or grouping?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2870
2878
.
4.
Dai
,
H.
, and
Green
,
D. M.
(
1992
). “
Auditory intensity perception: Successive versus simultaneous, across-channel discriminations
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
2845
2854
.
5.
Dannenbring
,
G. L.
, and
Bregman
,
A. S.
(
1978
). “
Streaming vs. fusion of sinusoidal components of complex tones
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
24
,
369
376
.
6.
Darwin
,
C. J.
, and
Ciocca
,
V.
(
1992
). “
Grouping in pitch perception: Effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
3381
3390
.
7.
Darwin, C. J., and Sutherland, N. S. (1984). “Grouping frequency components of vowels: When is a harmonic not a harmonic?” Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 36A, 193–208.
8.
Green, D. M. (1988). Profile Analysis: Auditory Intensity Discrimination (Oxford University, Oxford).
9.
Green, D. M., and Dai, H. (1992). “Temporal relations in profile comparisons,” in Auditory Physiology and Perception, edited by Y. Cazals, L. Demany, and K. Horner (Pergamon, Oxford), pp. 471–477.
10.
Green
,
D. M.
, and
Kidd
, Jr.,
G.
(
1983
). “
Further studies of auditory profile analysis
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
73
,
1260
1265
.
11.
Green
,
D. M.
,
Kidd
, Jr.,
G.
, and
Picardi
,
M. C.
(
1983
). “
Successive versus simultaneous comparisons in auditory intensity discrimination
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
73
,
639
643
.
12.
Green
,
D. M.
, and
Nguyen
,
Q. T.
(
1988
). “
Profile analysis: Detecting dynamic spectral changes
,”
Hearing Res.
32
,
147
164
.
13.
Grose
,
J. H.
, and
Hall
,
J. W.
(
1993
). “
Comodulation masking release: Is comodulation sufficient?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2896
2902
.
14.
Hall, J. W., Grose, J. H., and Mendoza, L. (1995). “Across-channel processes in masking,” in Hearing, edited by B. C. J. Moore (Academic, San Diego), pp. 243–266.
15.
Hill
,
N. I.
, and
Darwin
,
C. J.
(
1996
). “
Lateralization of a perturbed harmonic: Effects of onset asynchrony and mistuning
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
2352
2364
.
16.
Levitt
,
H.
(
1971
). “
Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
49
,
467
477
.
17.
Raney
,
J. J.
,
Richards
,
V. M.
,
Onsan
,
Z. A.
, and
Green
,
D. M.
(
1989
). “
Signal uncertainty and psychometric functions in profile analysis
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
86
,
954
960
.
18.
Richards
,
V. M.
,
Onsan
,
Z. A.
, and
Green
,
D. M.
(
1989
). “
Auditory profile analysis: Potential pitch cues
,”
Hearing Res.
39
,
27
36
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.