Broadband normalized signal loss of commercially available Albunex®, an ultrasonic contrast agent, was measured in vitro at concentrations approaching those which may be found in vivo for clinical doses. The measurements were made using a novel specimen chamber, careful material handling procedures, and a broadband square wave pulser system. Results were obtained over the full bandwidth of the experimental system (1 to 20 MHz) at concentrations up to 1.9×106 microspheres/mL. Further results were obtained over a partial bandwidth of the experimental system at concentrations up to 1.5×107 microspheres/mL. The frequency-dependent signal loss exhibited a peak for all concentrations investigated. In the meaningful bandwidth of the system, the signal loss (expressed in dB) was directly proportional to microsphere concentration. The experimental results for normalized signal loss were compared with predictions from a linear single-scattering model for encapsulated bubbles. The experimental data was used to estimate values for the two adjustable parameters in the model: microsphere shell elasticity (4200±1000 dyn/cm) and friction (0.0054±0.0015 dyn s/cm).

1.
N.
de Jong
,
L.
Skotland
, and
N.
Bom
,
“Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements
,”
Ultrasonics
30
,
95
103
(
1992
).
2.
N.
de Jong
and
L.
Hoff
, “
Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres
,”
Ultrasonics
31
,
175
181
(
1993
).
3.
N. de Jong, “Acoustic Properties of Ultrasound Contrast Agents,” Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus University, 1993.
4.
C. C.
Church
, “
The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
1510
1521
(
1995
).
5.
H. J.
Bleeker
,
K. K.
Shung
, and
J. L.
Barnhart
, “
Ultrasonics characterization of Albunex®, a new contrast agent
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
1792
1797
(
1990
).
6.
H. J. Bleeker, K. K. Shung, and J. L. Barnhart, “On the Application of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents for Blood Flowmetry and Assessment of Cardiac Perfusion,” J. Ultrasound Med. 9, 461–471 (1990).
7.
N. de Jong, F. J. ten Cate, W. B. Vletter, and J. R. T. C. Roelandt, “Quantification of transpulmonary echocontrast effects,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. 19, 279–288 (1993).
8.
J. G. Wiencek, S. B. Feinstein, R. Walker, and S. Aronson, “Pitfalls in Quantitative Contrast Echocardiography: The Steps to Quantitation of Perfusion,” J. Am. Soc. Echocardiography 6, 395–416 (1993).
9.
C. Vuille, M. Nidorf, R. L. Morrissey, J. B. Newell, A. E. Weyman, and M. H. Picard, “Effect of Static Pressure on the Disappearance Rate of Specific Echocardiographic Contrast Agents,” J. Am. Soc. Echocardiography 7, 347–354 (1994).
10.
P. H. Chang and K. K. Shung, “Attenuation and backscatter measurements on Albunex®,” IEEE Ultrason. Symp. Proc. 913–916 (1993).
11.
S.
Holm
,
M.
Myhrum
, and
L.
Hoff
, “
Modelling of the ultrasound return from Albunex microspheres
,”
Ultrasonics
32
,
123
130
(
1994
).
12.
P. C.
Waterman
and
R.
Truell
, “
Multiple Scattering of Waves
,”
J. Math. Phys.
2
,
512
537
(
1961
).
13.
K. W.
Commander
and
A.
Prosperetti
, “
Linear pressure waves in bubbly liquids: Comparison between theory and experiments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
732
746
(
1989
).
14.
J. L.
Leander
, “
Transient wave propagation through bubbly layers via the Foldy–Twersky integral equation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
2378
2386
(
1994
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.