Microcalcifications are small crystals of calcium apatites which form in human tissue through a number of mechanisms. The size, morphology, and distribution of microcalcifications are important indicators in the mammographic screening for and diagnosis of various carcinomas in the breast. Although x-ray mammography is currently the only accepted method for detecting microcalcifications, its efficacy in this regard can be reduced in the presence of dense parenchyma. Current ultrasound scanners do not reliably detect microcalcifications in the size range of clinical interest. The results of theoretical, simulation, and experimental studies focused on the improvement of the ultrasonic visualization of microcalcifications are presented. Methods for estimating the changes in microcalcification detection performance which result from changes in aperture geometry or the presence of an aberrator are presented. An analysis of the relative efficacy of spatial compounding and synthetic receive aperture geometries in the detection of microcalcifications is described. The impact of log compression of the detected image on visualization is discussed. Registered high resolution ultrasound and digital spot mammography images of microcalcifications in excised breast carcinoma tissue and results from the imaging of suspected microcalcifications in vivo are presented.

Topics
Ultrasound, Ultrasonics, X-rays, Chemical elements, Diseases and conditions, Mammography
1.
L. W. Bassett and D. L. Butler, “Mammography and early breast cancer detection,” Am. Fam. Physician 43, 547–557 (1991).
2.
D. M. Hansell, J. C. Cooke, C. A. Parsons, S. H. Evans, D. R. Dance, J. M. Bliss, and I. Ilesley, “A quantitative analysis of the spatial relationships of grouped microcalcifications demonstrated on xeromammography in benign and malignant breast disease,” Br. J. Radiol. 61, 21–25 (1988).
3.
B.
de Lafontan
,
J. P.
Daures
,
B.
Salicru
,
F.
Eynius
,
J.
Mihura
,
P.
Rouanet
,
J. L.
Lamarque
,
A.
Naja
, and
H.
Pujol
, “
Isolated clustered microcalcifications: diagnostic value of mammography—series of 400 cases with surgical verification
,”
Radiology
190(2
),
479
–
483
(
1994
).
Google Scholar
 
4.
E. S. de Paredes, P. L. Abbitt, S. Tabbarah, M. A. Bickers, and D. C. Smith, “Mammographic and histologic correlations of microcalcifications,” RadioGraphics 10(4), 577–589 (1990).
5.
A.
Fandos-Morera
,
M.
Prats-Esteve
,
J.
Tura-Soteras
, and
A.
Traveria-Cros
, “
Breast tumors: composition of microcalcifications
,”
Radiology
169(2)
,
325
–
327
(
1988
).
Google Scholar
 
6.
V. P.
Jackson
,
R. E.
Hendrick
,
S. A.
Feig
, and
D. B.
Kopans
, “
Imaging of the radiographically dense breast
,”
Radiology
188
,
297
–
301
(
1993
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
7.
C. T. M. Brekelmans, H. J. A. Collette, C. Collette, J. Fracheboud, and F. de Waard, “Breast cancer after a negative screen: follow-up of women participating in the DOM screening programme,” Eur. J. Cancer 28A, 893–895 (1992).
8.
I. C. Bennett, R. Freitas, Jr., and I. S. Fentiman, “Diagnosis of breast cancer in young women,” Aust. New Zealand J. Surg. 61, 284–289 (1991).
9.
M. L. Palmer and T. N. Tsangaris, “Breast biopsy in women 30 years old or less,” Am. J. Surg. 165, 708–712 (1993).
10.
I. R. Brand, D. A. Sapherson, and T. S. Brown, “Breast imaging in women under 35 with symptomatic breast disease,” Br. J. Radiol. 66, 394–397 (1993).
11.
V. P. Jackson, “Sonography of malignant breast disease,” Semin. Ultrasound, CT, MR 10(2), 119–131 (1989).
12.
P. B. Guyer and K. C. Dewbury, “Ultrasound of the breast in the symptomatic and X-ray dense breast,” Clin. Radiol. 36, 69–76 (1985).
13.
A. J. Potterton, D. J. Peakman, and J. R. Young, “Ultrasound demonstration of small breast cancers detected by mammographic screening,” Clin. Radiol. 49, 808–813 (1994).
14.
P. B. Guyer, K. C. Dewbury, D. Warwick, J. Smallwood, and I. Taylor, “Direct contact B-scan ultrasound in the diagnosis of solid breast masses,” Clin. Radiol. 37, 451–458 (1986).
15.
F. Kasumi, “Can microcalcifications located within breast carcinomas be detected by ultrasound imaging?,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. Suppl. 1 14, 175–182 (1988).
16.
L. Filipczynski, “Detectability of calcifications in breast tissues by the ultrasonic echo method,” Arch. Acoust. 8(3), 205–222 (1983).
17.
L. Filipczynski, and G. Lypacewicz, “Estimation of calcification in breast tissues by means of the ultrasonic echo and shadow methods,” Arch. Acoust. 9(1–2), 41–50 (1984).
18.
L. Filipczynski, T. Kujawska, and G. Lypacewicz, “Ultrasonic echo method in detection breast calcifications. Transient analysis,” Arch. Acoust. 11(3), 287–298 (1986).
19.
D. E. Grenoble, J. L. Katz, K. L. Dunn, R. S. Gilmore, and K. L. Murty, “The elastic properties of hard tissues and apatites,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 6, 221–233 (1972).
20.
E. Kelly-Fry, S. T. Morris, V. P. Jackson, R. W. Holder, and N. T. Sanghvi, “Variation of transducer frequency output and receiver band-pass characteristics for improved detection and image characterization of solid breast masses,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. Suppl. 1 14, 143–161 (1988).
21.
P. J. Dempsey, “The importance of resolution in the clinical application of breast sonography,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. Suppl. 1 14, 43–48 (1988).
22.
V. P.
Jackson
,
E.
Kelly-Fry
,
P. A.
Rothschild
,
H. R. W.
, and
S. A.
Clark
, “
Automated breast sonography using a 7.5 MHz PVDF transducer: preliminary clinical evaluation
,”
Radiology
159(3
),
679
–
684
(
1986
).
Google Scholar
 
23.
L. F.
Nock
, and
G. E.
Trahey
, “
Synthetic receive aperture imaging with phase correction for motion and for tissue inhomogeneities, part I: basic principles
,”
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr.
39(4
),
489
–
495
(
1992
).
Google Scholar
 
24.
P. D. Freiburger, D. C. Sullivan, B. H. LeBlanc, S. W. Smith, and G. E. Trahey, “Two-dimensional ultrasonic beam distortion in the breast: in vivo measurements and effects,” Ultrason. Imag. 14, 398–414 (1992).
25.
P. D. Edmonds, C. L. Mortensen, J. R. Hill, S. K. Holland, J. F. Jensen, P. Schattner, and A. D. Valdes, “Ultrasound tissue characterization of breast biopsy specimens,” Ultrason. Imag. 13, 162–185 (1991).
26.
J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics (Wiley–Interscience, New York, 1985).
27.
J. A.
Jensen
, and
N. B.
Svendsen
, “
Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers
,”
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Control
39(2
),
262
–
267
(
1992
).
Google Scholar
 
28.
J. A.
Swets
, “
ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques
,”
Invest. Radiol.
14(2
),
109
–
121
(
1979
).
Google Scholar
 
29.
S. W.
Flax
, and
M.
O'Donnell
, “
Phase aberration correction using signals from point reflectors and diffuse scatters: basic principles
,”
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Control
35(6
),
758
–
767
(
1988
).
Google Scholar
 
30.
A. J.
Rudgers
, “
Acoustic pulses scattered by a rigid sphere immersed in a fluid
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
45(4
),
900
–
910
(
1968
).
Google Scholar
 
31.
L. M.
Hinkelman
,
D. L.
Liu
, and
R. C.
Waag
, “
Measurement and correction of ultrasonic pulse distortion produced by the human breast
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
1958
–
1969
(
1995
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
32.
J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (McGraw-Hill, San Francisco, 1986).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1997 Acoustical Society of America.
1997
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.