A computational auditory nerve (AN) model was developed for use in modeling psychophysical experiments with normal and impaired human listeners. In this phenomenological model, many physiologically vulnerable response properties associated with the cochlear amplifier are represented by a single nonlinear control mechanism, including the effects of level-dependent tuning, compression, level-dependent phase, suppression, and fast nonlinear dynamics on the responses of high, medium, and low spontaneous-rate (SR) AN fibers. Several model versions are described that can be used to evaluate the relative effects of these nonlinear properties.
REFERENCES
1.
X.
Zhang
, M. G.
Heinz
, I. C.
Bruce
, and L. H.
Carney
, “A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
, 648
–670
(2001
).2.
M. A. Ruggero, “Physiology and coding of sound in the auditory nerve,” in The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology, edited by A. N. Popper and R. R. Fay (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992), pp. 34–93.
3.
M. C.
Liberman
, “Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
, 442
–455
(1978
).4.
R. L.
Winslow
and M. B.
Sachs
, “Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle
,” Hear. Res.
35
, 165
–190
(1988
).5.
I. M.
Winter
and A. R.
Palmer
, “Intensity coding in low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers of the guinea pig
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
, 1958
–1967
(1991
).6.
M. G. Heinz, H. S. Colburn, and L. H. Carney, “Evaluating auditory performance limits: I. One-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve,” Neural Computation, in press (2001).
7.
M. G. Heinz, “Quantifying the effects of the cochlear amplifier on temporal and average-rate information in the auditory nerve,” Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (2000).
8.
M. B.
Sachs
and N. Y. S.
Kiang
, “Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
43
, 1120
–1128
(1968
).9.
B.
Delgutte
, “Two-tone rate suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: Dependence on suppressor frequency and level
,” Hear. Res.
49
, 225
–246
(1990
).10.
D. D.
Greenwood
, “A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
, 2592
–2605
(1990
).11.
B. R.
Glasberg
and B. C. J.
Moore
, “Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data
,” Hear. Res.
47
, 103
–138
(1990
).12.
R. D. Patterson, I. Nimmo-Smith, J. Holdsworth, and P. Rice, “An efficient auditory filterbank based on the gammatone function,” paper presented at a meeting of the IOC Speech Group on Auditory Modeling at RSRE, December 14–15 (1987).
13.
M. B.
Sachs
and P. J.
Abbas
, “Rate versus level functions for auditory nerve fibers in cats: Tone burst stimuli
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
, 680
–691
(1974
).14.
W. S.
Rhode
and P. H.
Smith
, “Characteristics of tone-pip response patterns in relationship to spontaneous rate in cat auditory nerve fibers
,” Hear. Res.
18
, 159
–168
(1985
).15.
D. H.
Johnson
, “The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
68
, 1115
–1122
(1980
).16.
M. A.
Ruggero
, N. C.
Rich
, A.
Recio
, S. S.
Narayan
, and L.
Robles
, “Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 2151
–2163
(1997
).17.
N. P.
Cooper
and W. S.
Rhode
, “Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea
,” J. Neurophysiol.
78
, 261
–270
(1997
).18.
M. L.
Hicks
and S. P.
Bacon
, “Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
, 326
–338
(1999
).19.
D. J.
Anderson
, J. E.
Rose
, J. E.
Hind
, and J. F.
Brugge
, “Temporal position of discharges in single auditory nerve fibers within the cycle of a sinewave stimulus: Frequency and intensity effects
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
49
, 1131
–1139
(1971
).20.
R. V.
Harrison
, “Rate-versus-intensity function and related AP responses in normal and pathological guinea pig and human cochleas
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
70
, 1036
–1044
(1981
).21.
E. M.
Relkin
and J. R.
Doucet
, “Recovery from prior stimulation. I: Relationship to spontaneous firing rates of primary auditory neurons
,” Hear. Res.
55
, 215
–222
(1991
).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 Acoustical Society of America.
2001
Acoustical Society of America