Four adult users of the Mini System 22 cochlear implant participated in an experiment to investigate the perceptual independence of place-of-stimulation and temporal cues for pulsatile electrical stimulation. The motivation was the relatively poor rate discrimination ability of cochlear implantees compared to the higher accuracy of temporal coding revealed by electrophysiological measurements and the performance of normal hearing listeners. The hypothesis tested was that the central auditory system can combine consistent rate and place cues in a way that is more effective than using each cue independently. Difference limens for rate change, place change, and combined rate and place change (with consistent and inconsistent cues) were compared for stimulation at low and high rates. The results were compatible with place and rate cues being used independently in the combined rate- and place-change conditions, with no advantage found for the consistent-cue conditions.

1.
Burns
,
E. M.
, and
Viemeister
,
N. F.
(
1976
). “
Nonspectral pitch
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
60
,
863
869
.
2.
Burns
,
E. M.
, and
Viemeister
,
N. F.
(
1981
). “
Played-again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
70
,
1655
1660
.
3.
Carlyon (2000). “Simulating a cochlear implant,” http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/Research/implant.html.
4.
Demany
,
L.
, and
Semal
,
C.
(
1993
). “
Pitch versus brightness of timbre: Detecting combined shifts in fundamental and formant frequency
,”
Music Perception
11
,
1
14
.
5.
Hartmann, R., and Klinke, R. (1990). “Response characteristics of nerve fibers to patterned electrical stimulation,” in Cochlear Implants: Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear, edited by J. M. Miller and F. A. Spelman (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 135–159.
6.
Javel, E. (1990). “Acoustic and electrical encoding of temporal information,” in Cochlear Implants: Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear, edited by J. M. Miller and F. A. Spelman (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 247–295.
7.
McDermott
,
H. J.
, and
McKay
,
C. M.
(
1994
). “
Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
155
162
.
8.
Sek
,
A.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1995
). “
Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency, measured in several ways
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
2479
2486
.
9.
Tong
,
Y. C.
,
Blamey
,
P. J.
,
Dowell
,
R. C.
, and
Clark
,
G. M.
(
1983
). “
Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
,
73
80
.
10.
Tong
,
Y. C.
, and
Clark
,
G. M.
(
1985
). “
Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
,
1881
1888
.
11.
Townshend
,
B.
,
Cotter
,
N.
,
Van Compernolle
,
D.
, and
White
,
R. L.
(
1987
). “
Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
106
115
.
12.
Shannon
,
R. V.
(
1983
). “
Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man: I. Basic psychophysics
,”
Hear. Res.
11
,
157
189
.
13.
Van den Honert
,
C.
, and
Stypulkowski
,
P. H.
(
1987
). “
Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli
,”
Hear. Res.
29
,
207
222
.
This content is only available via PDF.