Four adult users of the Mini System 22 cochlear implant participated in an experiment to investigate the perceptual independence of place-of-stimulation and temporal cues for pulsatile electrical stimulation. The motivation was the relatively poor rate discrimination ability of cochlear implantees compared to the higher accuracy of temporal coding revealed by electrophysiological measurements and the performance of normal hearing listeners. The hypothesis tested was that the central auditory system can combine consistent rate and place cues in a way that is more effective than using each cue independently. Difference limens for rate change, place change, and combined rate and place change (with consistent and inconsistent cues) were compared for stimulation at low and high rates. The results were compatible with place and rate cues being used independently in the combined rate- and place-change conditions, with no advantage found for the consistent-cue conditions.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 01 2000
Place and temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent?
Colette M. McKay;
Colette M. McKay
The University of Melbourne Department of Otolaryngology, 384-388 Albert Street, East Melbourne 3002, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Hugh J. McDermott;
Hugh J. McDermott
The University of Melbourne Department of Otolaryngology, 384-388 Albert Street, East Melbourne 3002, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert P. Carlyon
Robert P. Carlyon
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England
Search for other works by this author on:
ARLO 1, 25–30 (2000)
Article history
Received:
April 17 2000
Accepted:
August 17 2000
Citation
Colette M. McKay, Hugh J. McDermott, Robert P. Carlyon; Place and temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent?. ARLO 1 July 2000; 1 (1): 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1318742
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Related Content
Effects of selective stimulation of apical electrodes on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant recipients
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2024)
Pitch perception and representations of frequency in the peripheral auditory system: What’s missing in cochlear implants?
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2015)
Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2009)
Sequential stream segregation in normally-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2017)
Effect of stimulation parameters on sequential current-steered stimuli in cochlear implants
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2022)