Is Newton’s second law really Newton’s? | Citedby Results | American Journal of Physics | AIP Publishing

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Is Newton’s second law really Newton’s?

Am. J. Phys. 79, 1015–1022 (2011)

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

The most appropriate method to obtain Euler's F = ma (1776) from Principia's Second Law (1686): A historical analysis

Ajay Sharma

Science Talks 100410.

Euler is an innovator of F =ma, Newton’s second law gives F = KdV; F =ma may be obtained from Newton’s law by logically modifying it

Ajay Sharma
S.G. Malla
B. Pragathi
U.R. Muduli
H. Awad

E3S Web of Conferences (2024) 540: 14005.

Forces in a true and physical sense: from mathematical models to metaphysical conclusions

Corey Dethier

Synthese 198, 1109 (2021)

On the deduction of Newton’s second law

R. Lopes Coelho

Acta Mechanica 229, 2287 (2018)

Reply to “Comment on ‘Is Newton’s second law really Newton’s?’ by Bruce Pourciau [Am. J. Phys. 79(10), 1015–1022 (2011)]”

Bruce Pourciau

American Journal of Physics 80, 934 (2012)

Comment on “Is Newton’s second law really Newton’s?” by Bruce Pourciau [Am. J. Phys. 79(10), 1015–1022 (2011)]

Michael Nauenberg

American Journal of Physics 80, 931 (2012)