At an estimated cost of $8 billion annually in the United States, revision surgeries to total joint replacements represent a substantial financial burden to the health care system and a tremendous mental and physical burden on patients and their caretakers. Fixation failures, such as implant loosening, wear, and mechanical instability of the poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) cement, which bonds the implant to the bone, are the main causes of long-term implant failure. Early and accurate diagnosis of cement failure is critical for developing novel therapeutic strategies and reducing the high risk of a misjudged revision. Unfortunately, prevailing imaging modalities, notably plain radiographs, struggle to detect the precursors of implant failure and are often interpreted incorrectly. Our prior work has shown that the modification of PMMA bone cement with low concentrations of conductive fillers makes it piezoresistive and therefore self-sensing. When combined with a conductivity imaging modality such as electrical impedance tomography (EIT), it is possible to monitor load transfer across the PMMA using cost-effective, physiologically benign, non-contact, and real-time electrical measurements. Despite the ability of EIT for monitoring load transfer across self-sensing PMMA bone cement, it is unable to accurately characterize failure mechanisms. Overcoming this challenge is critical to the success of this technology in practice. Therefore, we herein expand upon our previous results by integrating machine learning techniques with EIT for cement condition characterization with the goal of establishing the feasibility of even off-the-shelf machine learning algorithms to address this important problem. We survey a wide variety of different machine learning algorithms for application to this problem, including neural networks on voltage readings of an EIT phantom for tracking the spatial position of a sample, specifying defect orientation within a sample, and classifying defect types, including cracks and delaminations. In addition, we explore the utilization of principal component analysis (PCA) for pre-treating impedance signals in each of these problems. Within the tested algorithms, our results show clear advantages of neural networks, support vector machines, and K-nearest neighbor algorithms for interpreting EIT signals. We also show that PCA is an effective addition to machine learning. These preliminary results demonstrate that the combination of smart materials, EIT, and machine learning may be a powerful instrumentation tool for diagnosing the origin and evolution of mechanical failure in joint replacements.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
CHORUS
Article navigation
December 2023
Research Article|
December 15 2023
Comparing machine learning algorithms for non-invasive detection and classification of failure in piezoresistive bone cement via electrical impedance tomography Available to Purchase
L. Keiderling;
L. Keiderling
(Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing)
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital
, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Rosendorf
;
J. Rosendorf
(Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing)
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital
, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
C. E. Owens
;
C. E. Owens
(Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing)
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
K. M. Varadarajan
;
K. M. Varadarajan
(Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – review & editing)
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital
, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
A. J. Hart
;
A. J. Hart
(Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing)
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Schwab;
J. Schwab
(Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – review & editing)
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital
, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
T. N. Tallman
;
T. N. Tallman
a)
(Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing)
3
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University
, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
H. Ghaednia
H. Ghaednia
(Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing)
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital
, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
L. Keiderling
1
J. Rosendorf
1
C. E. Owens
2
K. M. Varadarajan
1
A. J. Hart
2
J. Schwab
1
T. N. Tallman
3,a)
H. Ghaednia
1
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital
, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
3
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University
, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 94, 124103 (2023)
Article history
Received:
October 23 2022
Accepted:
November 21 2023
Citation
L. Keiderling, J. Rosendorf, C. E. Owens, K. M. Varadarajan, A. J. Hart, J. Schwab, T. N. Tallman, H. Ghaednia; Comparing machine learning algorithms for non-invasive detection and classification of failure in piezoresistive bone cement via electrical impedance tomography. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1 December 2023; 94 (12): 124103. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0131671
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Overview of the early campaign diagnostics for the SPARC tokamak (invited)
M. L. Reinke, I. Abramovic, et al.
An ion-imaging detector for high count rates
Kai Golibrzuch, Florian Nitz, et al.
Line-scan imaging for real-time phenotypic screening of C.
elegans
Aaron Au, Maximiliano Giuliani, et al.
Related Content
A hybrid of iterative Gauss–Newton and one-dimensional convolutional neural network for high-resolution electrical impedance tomography
AIP Advances (January 2024)
Analysis of the results of replacement of large bone defects in the patients who underwent segmental bone resection for tumor
AIP Conf. Proc. (September 2017)
Design and fabrication of personalized knee prostheses by laser-based powder bed fusion: Influence of manufacturing process on geometric accuracy
J. Laser Appl. (November 2021)
Rate dependent behaviors of nickel-based microcapsules
Appl. Phys. Lett. (May 2018)