A towed Overhauser marine geomagnetic magnetometer used for weak magnetic anomaly detection in severe ocean conditions is studied to investigate means to reduce the negative effect of dynamic behavior and magnetic noise associated with ocean waves. For the dynamic effect, a continuous polarization workflow is proposed to enhance the free-induction-decay signal, and then, a multi-angle pickup coil and a self-tracking programmable amplifier are used to further reduce the adverse effect caused by uncontrollable changes in the towfish attitude on the signal quality. Furthermore, to achieve adaptive suppression of magnetic noise in different ocean conditions and areas, a modified adaptive Kalman algorithm is assessed. In addition, an optimized Overhauser sensor and a towfish were developed. Overall, the experimental results show that the sensor can effectively suppress the dynamic effect and magnetic noise. Regarding the magnetic sensitivity, uncertainty and range are 12 pT/Hz1/2@1Hz and 0.21 nT and 20 000 nT–100 000 nT, respectively. Moreover, underwater testing was performed to verify the function and the detection of the magnetic anomaly.

1.
M.
Mandea
and
M.
Korte
,
Geomagnetic Observations and Models
(
Springer Science & Business Media
,
Berlin, Germany
,
2010
), Vol. 5.
2.
K.
Ogawa
,
T.
Matsuno
,
H.
Ichihara
,
K.
Nakahigashi
, and
N.
Seama
, “
A new miniaturized magnetometer system for long-term distributed observation on the seafloor
,”
Earth, Planets Space
70
(
1
),
111
(
2018
).
3.
I.
Kawashima
and
H.
Toh
, “
Tsunami-generated magnetic fields may constrain focal mechanisms of earthquakes
,”
Sci. Rep.
6
,
28603
(
2016
).
4.
N. R.
Schnepf
,
C.
Manoj
,
A.
Kuvshinov
,
H.
Toh
, and
S.
Maus
, “
Tidal signals in ocean-bottom magnetic measurements of the Northwestern Pacific: Observation versus prediction
,”
Geophys. J. Int.
198
(
2
),
1096
1110
(
2014
).
5.
L.
Fan
,
X.
Kang
,
Q.
Zheng
,
X.
Zhang
,
X.
Liu
,
C.
Chen
, and
C.
Kang
, “
A fast linear algorithm for magnetic dipole localization using total magnetic field gradient
,”
IEEE Sens. J.
18
(
3
),
1032
1038
(
2017
).
6.
X.
Qu
,
C.
Wang
,
G.
Fang
, and
H.
Yin
, “
Detecting anomaly targets using handheld frequency domain electromagnetic system
,”
Sens. Actuators, A
268
,
155
163
(
2017
).
7.
K.
Nakamura
,
T.
Toki
,
N.
Mochizuki
,
M.
Asada
,
J.-i.
Ishibashi
,
Y.
Nogi
,
S.
Yoshikawa
,
J.-i.
Miyazaki
, and
K.
Okino
, “
Discovery of a new hydrothermal vent based on an underwater, high-resolution geophysical survey
,”
Deep Sea Res., Part I
74
,
1
10
(
2013
).
8.
M. A.
Tivey
and
J.
Dyment
, “
The magnetic signature of hydrothermal systems in slow spreading environments
,” in
Diversity of Hydrothermal Systems on Slow Spreading Ocean Ridges
, Geophysical Monograph Series Vol. 188 (
AGU
,
2010
), pp.
43
65
.
9.
L. G.
Miller
and
K. D.
von Ellenrieder
, “
Modeling and simulation of an AUV-towfish system
,” in
2013 Oceans, San Diego
(
IEEE
,
2013
), pp.
1
9
.
10.
L.
Paull
,
S.
Saeedi
,
M.
Seto
, and
H.
Li
, “
AUV navigation and localization: A review
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.
39
(
1
),
131
149
(
2013
).
11.
M.
Dhanak
,
E.
An
,
R.
Coulson
,
J.
Frankenfield
,
S.
Ravenna
,
D.
Pugsley
,
G.
Valdes
, and
W.
Venezia
, “
AUV-based characterization of EMF emissions from submerged power cables
,” in
2015 Oceans, Genova
(
IEEE
,
2015
), pp.
1
6
.
12.
V. A.
Sapunov
,
A. Yu.
Denisov
,
D. V.
Saveliev
,
A. A.
Soloviev
,
S. Yu.
Khomutov
,
P. B.
Borodin
,
E. D.
Narkhov
,
A. V.
Sergeev
, and
A. N.
Shirokov
, “
New vector/scalar Overhauser DNP magnetometers POS-4 for magnetic observatories and directional oil drilling support
,”
Magn. Reson. Solids. Electron. J.
18
(
2
),
16209
(
2016
).
13.
J.
Ge
,
X.
Qiu
,
H.
Dong
,
W.
Luo
,
H.
Liu
,
Z.
Yuan
,
J.
Zhu
, and
H.
Zhang
, “
Short-time and high-precision measurement method for larmor frequency of marine Overhauser sensor
,”
IEEE Sens. J.
18
(
4
),
1442
1448
(
2017
).
14.
M.
Tchernychev
,
R.
Johnson
, and
J.
Kulpa
, “
Using a transverse marine gradiometer (TVG) as submarine pipeline location tool
,” in
2013 Oceans, San Diego
(
IEEE
,
2013
), pp.
1
6
.
15.
D.
Budker
and
D. F. J.
Kimball
,
Optical Magnetometry
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
,
2013
).
16.
S.
Tumanski
,
Handbook of Magnetic Measurements
(
CRC Press
,
2016
).
17.
J.
Ge
,
H.
Li
,
W.
Luo
,
H.
Dong
,
H.
Liu
,
H.
Wang
,
W.
Wang
,
Z.
Yuan
,
J.
Zhu
, and
H.
Zhang
, “
Aeromagnetic system for a multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle based on the Overhauser sensor
,”
J. Instrum.
14
(
01
),
P01015
(
2019
).
18.
P.
Mahavarkar
,
S.
Singh
,
S.
Labde
,
V.
Dongre
, and
A.
Patil
, “
The low cost proton precession magnetometer developed at the Indian Institute of geomagnetism
,”
J. Instrum.
12
(
05
),
T05002
(
2017
).
19.
C.
Liao
,
Y.
Chen
,
X.
Cao
,
S.
Chen
,
H.
He
,
M.
Mani
,
M.
Jacob
,
V.
Magnotta
, and
J.
Zhong
, “
Efficient parallel reconstruction for high resolution multishot spiral diffusion data with low rank constraint
,”
Magn. Reson. Med.
77
(
3
),
1359
1366
(
2017
).
20.
M.
Engels
,
U.
Barckhausen
, and
J. S.
Gee
, “
A new towed marine vector magnetometer: Methods and results from a Central Pacific cruise
,”
Geophys. J. Int.
172
(
1
),
115
129
(
2008
).
21.
F.
Primdahl
,
J. M. G.
Merayo
,
P.
Brauer
,
I.
Laursen
, and
T.
Risbo
, “
Internal field of homogeneously magnetized toroid sensor for proton free precession magnetometer
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
16
(
2
),
590
(
2005
).
22.
J. A.
Lu
,
J. Y.
Chai
,
X.
Xu
,
X.
Yan
,
H.
Huang
,
Y. J.
Yu
, and
Z. B.
Li
, “
The study on the deep sea magnetic diurnal variation system
,”
Mar. Sci. Bull.
26
,
392
395
(
2010
).
23.
K. C.
Maclure
,
R. A.
Hafer
, and
J. T.
Weaver
, “
Magnetic variations produced by ocean swell
,”
Nature
204
(
4965
),
1290
1291
(
1964
).
24.
J. T.
Weaver
, “
Magnetic variations associated with ocean waves and swell
,”
J. Geophys. Res.
70
(
8
),
1921
1929
, (
1965
).
25.
S. V.
Semkin
and
V. P.
Smagin
, “
The effect of self-induction on magnetic field generated by sea surface waves
,”
Izv. Atmos. Oceanic Phys.
48
(
2
),
207
213
(
2012
).
26.
F. E. M.
Lilley
,
A. P.
Hitchman
,
P. R.
Milligan
, and
T.
Pedersen
, “
Sea-surface observations of the magnetic signals of ocean swells
,”
Geophys. J. Int.
159
(
2
),
565
572
(
2004
).
27.
J.
Dostal
,
Z.
Martinec
, and
M.
Thomas
, “
The modelling of the toroidal magnetic field induced by tidal ocean circulation
,”
Geophys. J. Int.
189
(
2
),
782
798
(
2012
).
28.
A.
Kuvshinov
,
J.
Matzka
,
B.
Poedjono
,
F.
Samrock
,
N.
Olsen
, and
S.
Pai
, “
Probing Earth’s conductivity structure beneath oceans by scalar geomagnetic data: Autonomous surface vehicle solution
,”
Earth, Planets Space
68
(
1
),
189
(
2016
).
29.
P. B.
Smit
,
T. T.
Janssen
, and
T. H. C.
Herbers
, “
Stochastic modeling of inhomogeneous ocean waves
,”
Ocean Modelling
96
,
26
35
(
2015
).
30.
M.
Hughes
and
M.
Tomic
, “
Geomagnetic noise analysis and suppression from next generation autonomous systems 2009 sea trials
,” in
2010 Oceans MTS/IEEE, Seattle
(
IEEE
,
2010
), pp.
1
6
.
31.
H.
Yingchun
,
H.
Hu
, and
S.
Fang
, “
Simulation and removal of magnetic field noise generated by ocean waves
,”
Mar. Electri.
11
,
31
63
(
2009
).
32.
A.
Quinquis
and
S.
Rossignol
, “
Noise reduction, with a noise reference, of underwater magnetic signals
,”
Digit. Signal Process.
6
(
4
),
240
248
(
1996
).
33.
W.
Zhigang
, “
Study on noise removing by wavelet transform for dynamic measuring of ship magnetic field
,”
Ship Electr. Eng.
4
,
158
160
(
2011
).
34.
X.
Zhu
,
C.
Xiao
, and
Z.
Yao
, “
Noise elimination of wave-generated magnetic field at limited depth in ship’s dynamic magnetic measurement
,”
J. Nav. Univ. Eng.
26
(
3
),
48
51
(
2014
).
35.
R.
Lyall
,
X.
Li
,
J.
Rowe
 et al., “
Identification and removal of ocean swell effects in aeromagnetic surveys
,” in
2014 SEG Annual Meeting
,
2014
.
36.
X.
Xiong
,
R.
Yang
, and
H.
Wang
, “
Airborne magnetic anomaly detection algorithm for moving target under ocean wave generated magnetic noise
,”
J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Tech.
43
(
3
),
101
106
(
2015
).
37.
D.
Peng
and
L.
Chunsheng
, “
Implementation of adaptive filter on wave-generated magnetic noise based on LMS algorithm
,”
Electr. Meas. Technol.
12
,
58
60
(
2009
).
38.
B.
Qiang
,
X.
Zhang
,
X.
Jiang
, and
S.
Zhang
, “
Experimental research of proton magnetometer
,” in
2017 First International Conference on Electronics Instrumentation & Information Systems (EIIS)
(
IEEE
,
2017
), pp.
1
4
.
39.
C.
Tan
,
J.
Wang
, and
Z.
Li
, “
A frequency measurement method based on optimal multi-average for increasing proton magnetometer measurement precision
,”
Measurement
135
,
418
423
(
2019
).
40.
B.
Bai
,
H.
Liu
,
J.
Ge
, and
H.
Dong
, “
Research on an improved resonant cavity for Overhauser geomagnetic sensor
,”
IEEE Sens. J.
18
(
7
),
2713
2721
(
2018
).
41.
J.
Ge
,
H.
Dong
,
H.
Liu
,
Z.
Yuan
,
H.
Dong
,
Z.
Zhao
,
Y.
Liu
,
J.
Zhu
, and
H.
Zhang
, “
Overhauser geomagnetic sensor based on the dynamic nuclear polarization effect for magnetic prospecting
,”
Sensors
16
(
6
),
806
(
2016
).
42.
D. G.
Abrecht
,
J. M.
Schwantes
,
R. K.
Kukkadapu
,
B. S.
McDonald
,
G. C.
Eiden
, and
L. E.
Sweet
, “
Real-time noise reduction for Mössbauer spectroscopy through online implementation of a modified Kalman filter
,”
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res.
773
,
66
71
(
2015
).
43.
X.
Gao
,
D.
You
, and
S.
Katayama
, “
Seam tracking monitoring based on adaptive Kalman filter embedded Elman neural network during high-power fiber laser welding
,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr.
59
(
11
),
4315
4325
(
2012
).
44.
G.
Zhang
,
S.
Huang
, and
Q.
Lin
, “
In situ calibration of magnetic coil system using ellipticity-induced bell-bloom magnetometer
,”
IEEE Photonics J.
11
(
1
),
1
9
(
2018
).
45.
E. D.
Narkhov
,
L. A.
Muravyev
,
A. V.
Sergeev
,
A. L.
Fedorov
,
A. Yu.
Denisov
,
A. A.
Shirokov
, and
V. A.
Sapunov
, “
Applications of modern high-precision Overhauser magnetometers
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1886
,
020075
(
2017
).
You do not currently have access to this content.