Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) is a widely used technique to map surface potentials at the nanometer scale. In traditional KPFM, a feedback loop regulates the DC bias applied between a sharp conductive probe and a sample to nullify the electrostatic force (closed-loop operation). In comparison, open-loop techniques such as dual harmonic KPFM (DH-KPFM) are simpler to implement, are less sensitive to artefacts, offer the unique ability to probe voltage sensitive materials, and operate in liquid environments. Here, we directly compare the two techniques in terms of their bandwidth and sensitivity to instrumentation artefacts. Furthermore, we introduce a new correction for traditional KPFM termed “setpoint correction,” which allows us to obtain agreement between open and closed-loop techniques within 1%. Quantitative validation of DH-KPFM may lead to a wider adoption of open-loop KPFM techniques by the scanning probe community.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
December 2018
Research Article|
December 28 2018
Quantitative comparison of closed-loop and dual harmonic Kelvin probe force microscopy techniques Available to Purchase
Jason I. Kilpatrick
;
Jason I. Kilpatrick
a)
1
Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin
, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
Search for other works by this author on:
Liam Collins;
Liam Collins
2
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Stefan A. L. Weber
;
Stefan A. L. Weber
3
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
, 55128 Mainz, Germany
4
Department of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University
, 55128 Mainz, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Brian J. Rodriguez
Brian J. Rodriguez
a)
1
Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin
, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
5
School of Physics, University College Dublin
, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
Search for other works by this author on:
Jason I. Kilpatrick
1,a)
Liam Collins
2
Stefan A. L. Weber
3,4
Brian J. Rodriguez
1,5,a)
1
Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin
, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
2
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
3
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
, 55128 Mainz, Germany
4
Department of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University
, 55128 Mainz, Germany
5
School of Physics, University College Dublin
, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 123708 (2018)
Article history
Received:
February 09 2018
Accepted:
November 26 2018
Citation
Jason I. Kilpatrick, Liam Collins, Stefan A. L. Weber, Brian J. Rodriguez; Quantitative comparison of closed-loop and dual harmonic Kelvin probe force microscopy techniques. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1 December 2018; 89 (12): 123708. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5025432
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Overview of the early campaign diagnostics for the SPARC tokamak (invited)
M. L. Reinke, I. Abramovic, et al.
Controlled partial gravity platform for milligravity in drop tower experiments
Kolja Joeris, Matthias Keulen, et al.
An instrumentation guide to measuring thermal conductivity using frequency domain thermoreflectance (FDTR)
Dylan J. Kirsch, Joshua Martin, et al.
Related Content
Dual harmonic Kelvin probe force microscopy at the graphene–liquid interface
Appl. Phys. Lett. (April 2014)
The weight function for charges—A rigorous theoretical concept for Kelvin probe force microscopy
J. Appl. Phys. (January 2016)
Thickness mapping of high-κ dielectrics at the nanoscale
Appl. Phys. Lett. (February 2014)
Electrical study of trapped charges in nanoscale Ge islands by Kelvin probe force microscopy for nonvolatile memory applications
Appl. Phys. Lett. (December 2010)
Surface potential extraction from electrostatic and Kelvin-probe force microscopy images
J. Appl. Phys. (May 2018)